(g o f ) o alpha =g o (f o alpha)
restart;alpha := (1/2)*(-x-x*t1-y*t2-y*t3+sqrt(x^2+2*x^2*t1+2*x*y*t2+2*x*y*t3+x^2*t1^2+2*x*t1*y*t2+2*x*t1*y*t3+y^2*t2^2+2*y^2*t2*t3+y^2*t3^2-4*x*t4*y*t9-4*x^2*t4*t7-4*x*t4*y*t8-4*y^2*t9-4*y*x*t7-4*y^2*t8-4*y^2*t5*t9-4*y*t5*x*t7-4*y^2*t5*t8-4*y^2*t6*t9-4*y*t6*x*t7-4*y^2*t6*t8))/(x*t4+y+y*t5+y*t6);
g := -y/x;
f := (-x+sqrt(x^2-x*y-2*y^2))/(2*y+x);
subs(p=f,subs(q=f,subs(x=p,subs(y=q,g)))); # -1
g := (-x+sqrt(x^2-x*y-2*y^2))/(2*y+x);
f := x*y;
gof := subs(p=f,subs(q=f,subs(x=p,subs(y=q,g)))); # -(1/3)*(y/x+sqrt(-2*y^2/x^2))*x/y
lhsgofoalpha := subs(q= alpha,subs(p=alpha, subs(x=p,subs(y=q,gof))));
foalpha := subs(p= alpha,subs(q=alpha,subs(x=p,subs(y=q,f))));
rhsgofoalpha := subs(x= foalpha,subs(y= foalpha, g));
osys := lhsgofoalpha = rhsgofoalpha;
sys1 := subs(x=0, osys);
sys2 := subs(y=0, osys);
sys3 := subs(x=1, osys);
sys4 := subs(y=1, osys);
sys5 := subs(x=2, osys);
sys6 := subs(y=2, osys);
sys7 := subs(x=3, osys);
sys8 := subs(y=3, osys);
sys9 := subs(x=4, osys);
sys1 := subs(x=3,subs(y=2, osys));
sys2 := subs(x=5,subs(y=1, osys));
sys3 := subs(x=1,subs(y=5, osys));
sys4 := subs(x=1,subs(y=2, osys));
sys5 := subs(x=2,subs(y=5, osys));
sys6 := subs(x=5,subs(y=2, osys));
sys7 := subs(x=2,subs(y=1, osys));
sys8 := subs(x=3,subs(y=5, osys));
sys9 := subs(x=5,subs(y=3, osys));
res:=solve([sys1, sys2, sys3, sys4, sys5, sys6, sys7, sys8, sys9], {t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9});
eval(osys,res);
simplify(%);
`~`[lhs](select(evalb, res));

I want to begin by saying hello! im new to the forums i hope some one can give me a push in the right direction with some of my maple homework. im sort of stuck on a few of these questions and would be greatfull for some help. 

Let .

a) Let g be the tangent line to f when x = c. Use Maple to find g as a function of c.

b) Use Maple to plot f and g(3) using view = [0..5, -25..100].

c) Define a function called plot_tan that plots both f and g(c) where f is blue and g(c) is red. Also use the same view as in part (b). Note that plot_tan is also a function of c.

d) Using your function plot_tan, the following all in one graph using the display command:

plot_tan(1), plot_tan(1.5), plot_tan(2), plot_tan(2.5), plot_tan(3), plot_tan(3.5), plot_tan(4), plot_tan(4.5), plot_tan(5).

e) Try using the option insequence = true in the display command. What does this option do? (You will need to click on the graph and play around with some buttons).

now it seems to me i have to use the point slope formula to get to a fuction g of c. thanks in advance! i hope you can help

Data.xlsx

XY.mw

XYZ.mw

Hello,

I'm using the Global Optimization Toolbox to solve some examples and fit equations to a given data, finding "unknown" parameters. I generated the data on Excel, and I already know the values of these parameters.

The XY case is (there is no problem here, I just put as a example I follow):

> with(GlobalOptimization);
> with(plots);
> 
> X := ExcelTools:-Import("F:\\Data.xlsx", "Plan1", "I5:I25");
> Y := ExcelTools:-Import("F:\\Data.xlsx", "Plan1", "J5:J25");
> 
> XY := zip( (X, Y) -> [X, Y] , X, Y);
> fig1 := plot(XY, style = point, view = [.9 .. 3.1, 6 .. 40]);

> Model := A+B*x+C*x^2+D*cos(x)+E*exp(x):
> VarInterv := [A = 0 .. 10, B = 0 .. 10, C = -10 .. 10, D = 0 .. 10, E = 0 .. 10];

> ModelSubs := proc (x, val)

    subs({x = val}, Model)

    end proc;

> SqEr := expand(add((ModelSubs(x, X(i))-Y(i))^2, i = 1 .. 21));
> CoefList := GlobalSolve(SqEr, op(VarInterv), timelimit = 5000);
> 
> Model := subs(CoefList[2], Model):

I could find the right values of A, B, C, D and E. 

My problem is in the XYZ case, where I don't know how to "write" the right instruction. My last attempt was:

> with(GlobalOptimization);
> with(plots);

> X := ExcelTools:-Import("F:\\Data.xlsx", "Plan1", "Q5:Q25"); X2 := convert(X, list);
> Y := ExcelTools:-Import("F:\\Data.xlsx", "Plan1", "R5:R25"); Y2 := convert(Y, list);
> Z := ExcelTools:-Import("F:\\Data.xlsx", "Plan1", "S5:S25"); Z2 := convert(Z, list);
> NElem := numelems(X);

> pointplot3d(X2, Y2, Z2, axes = normal, labels = ["X", "Y", "Z"], symbol = box, color = red);

> Model := A*x+B*y+C*sin(x*y)+D*exp(x/y);

> VarInterv := [A = 0 .. 10, B = 0 .. 10, C = 0 .. 10, D = 0 .. 10];

> ModelSubs:=proc({x,y},val)

subs({(x,y)=val},Model)

end proc:
Error, missing default value for option(s)

> SqEr := expand(add((ModelSubs(x, y, X(i), Y(i))-Z(i))^2, i = 1 .. NElem));
> CoefList := GlobalSolve(SqEr, op(Range), timelimit = 5000);
Error, (in GlobalOptimization:-GlobalSolve) finite bounds must be provided for all variables

My actual problem involves six equations, six parameters and four or five independent variables on each equation, but I alread developed a way to solve two or more equations simultaneously.

Thanks

Does anybody know why the answer of a equation i am getting on maple is coming with "eval" written?

Example:

the answer should be a number ...

Why does it happen?

Dear Experts,

When I run this code in maple I am facing with "Error, (in dsolve/numeric/bvp) initial Newton iteration is not converging".

restart:
 
 unprotect('gamma');
 lambda:=5*10^5:
 mu:=0.003:
 beta:=4*10^(-10):
 delta:=0.2:
 alpha:=0.043:
 sigma:=alpha+delta:
 k:=6.24:
 gamma:=0.65:
 A[1]:=1:
 A[2]:=1:

ics := x[1](0)=1.7*10^8, x[2](0)=0,x[3](0)=400,psi[1](50)=0,psi[2](50)=0,psi[3](50)=0:

ode1:=diff(x[1](t), t)=lambda-mu*x[1](t)-(1-beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1])*beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)+delta*x[2](t),
 diff(x[2](t), t) =(1-beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1])*beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)-sigma*x[2](t),
 diff(x[3](t), t) =(1+psi[3](t)*k*x[2](t)/A[2])*k*x[2](t)-gamma*x[3](t),
 diff(psi[1](t), t) =-1+1/A[1]*beta^2*x[1](t)*x[3](t)^2*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))^2-psi[1](t)*(-mu+beta^2*x[3](t)^2*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1]*x[1](t)-(1-beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1])*beta*x[3](t))-psi[2](t)*(-beta^2*x[3](t)^2*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1]*x[1](t)+(1-beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1])*beta*x[3](t)),
> diff(psi[2](t), t) =1/A[2]*psi[3](t)^2*k^2*x[2](t)-psi[1](t)*delta+psi[2](t)*sigma-psi[3](t)*(psi[3](t)*k^2/A[2]*x[2](t)+(1+psi[3](t)*k*x[2](t)/A[2])*k),
> diff(psi[3](t), t) = 1/A[1]*beta^2*x[1](t)^2*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))^2-psi[1](t)*(beta^2*x[1](t)^2*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1]*x[3](t)-(1-beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1])*beta*x[1](t))-psi[2](t)*(-beta^2*x[1](t)^2*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1]*x[3](t)+(1-beta*x[1](t)*x[3](t)*(psi[1](t)-psi[2](t))/A[1])*beta*x[1](t))+psi[3](t)*gamma;

sol:=dsolve([ode1,ics],numeric, method = bvp[midrich]);

Error, (in dsolve/numeric/bvp) initial Newton iteration is not converging

Please help me to solve this equation on Maple.

Hello,

I understand that the question is not really Maple related, but I still hope for some help.

See the worksheet below. I defined a pure sine wave and determined the complex Fourier coefficients for it which I used to plot the amplitude and power spectra. It is easy to see the relations in terms of amplitude and power between the time and frequency signal.

The Fourier Transform of the sine wave logically shows the Dirac distribution, but I can't see the relation in terms of amplitude and power to the original time signal. Taking the integral of the transformed signal (A) wil result in a step of Pi at w=-1 and again at w=1. What am I missing here?

Thanks

Download 20140127MaplePrime.mw

I am using Maple worksheets in a class. I have a student who finds it difficult to spend much time at the keyboard because of a joint disorder. I am looking for alternate input methods such as Dragon or the Dictate Facility on MacBooks which might help her out. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 

Thanks,

-Maury

THE FOLLOWING CODE 

restart;

A:=Matrix([[ a , b ], [ c , d ]]);

a:=1; b:=0; c:=0; d:=1;

A; 

produces differents results under MAPLE 16  linux i386 and under MAPLE 16  linux amd64

in the first case the last evalution has the following printed output:

on the second machine the printed output is

Does anybody has an explication; I thought that the "coorect behaviour was the first one since tables use last-name evalutation. But now I am puzzled.

how to decompose a matrix into time invariant and time variant 

is it possible to make time invariant and time variant template and then decompose into it

i mean decomposition can be 

 time invariant matrix + time variant matrix

or

 time invariant matrix * time variant matrix

 dsolve([Diff(f, t) = f, Diff(f,t) + g = h], f);

 dsolve([Diff(f, t) = f, Diff(f,t)*g = h], f);

where h is orthogonal matrix, f,g,h are matrix

would like to find g and f from h

can dsolve solve differential equation of matrix ? how?

dsolve([Diff(f(t), t) = f(t), Diff(f(t),t) + g(t) = h1(x)*h2(x), int(h1(x)*h2(x),x=-1..1) = 0], [f(t),g(t),h1(x),h2(x)]);

dsolve([Diff(f(t), t) = f(t), Diff(f(t),t)*g(t) = h1(x)*h2(x), int(h1(x)*h2(x),x=-1..1) = 0], [f(t),g(t),h1(x),h2(x)]);

assume x^2 + 1 is from interpolation of polynomial

pdsolve([Diff(f(t), t) = f(t), Diff(f(t),t) + g(t) = h1(x,t)*h2(x,t), h1(x,t)*h2(x,t)= x^2+1], [f(t),g(t),h1(x,t),h2(x,t)]);
pdsolve([Diff(f(t), t) = f(t), Diff(f(t),t)*g(t) = h1(x,t)*h2(x,t), h1(x,t)*h2(x,t) = x^2+1], [f(t),g(t),h1(x,t),h2(x,t)]);

these system can not be solved

hope no real number any more after decomposition and only have iinteger in I time invariant function

Hi everyone

I am currently trying to make my own simple package including a few procedures. So far I have been able to write some "code" that actually works when I open the document and hit "enter". I would, however, like to save the package so it can be accessed during any Maple session using the command "with". I have unsuccesfully tried to comprehend the Maple help pages regarding this question but I definitely don't want to mess things up.

This is what I have written:

mat := module ()
description "useful procedures for mathematics, physics and chemistry";
export AtomicWeight;
option package;

   AtomicWeight := proc (x) description "returns the average atomic mass of the naturally ocurring element";
   Units:-AddSystem(NewSystem, Units:-GetSystem(SI), u);
   return evalf(ScientificConstants:-Element(x, atomicweight, system = NewSystem, units))
   end proc

end module;

What should I do to save it correctly?

Thank in advance,
Mads

I received an unexpected error message when trying to minimize a function: evaluating

returns the error message

Error, (in @) too many levels of recursion

Why am I getting this message?  It's hard for me to see how minimizing a function involves recursion, unless Maple is trying to iteratively approximate a solution.

How to open batch maple output as mws in Maple Player?  I was used to doing this daily at work before retirement in my university office on a campus computer.  There was an "open" command in a file menu of some sort that I could click on, I seem to remember.   Am just fresh afte downloading Maple Player on my iMac and have it installed.  The file from my batch Maple output is form a run of batch Maple on the office machine that I can logon to remotely from home, as I did in this case.  I get rough looking graphic output (using the alphabet style graphics methods).  It would be good to have a more detailed and fine grained graphics to answer some basic questions that I am analyzing.  Thanks . . !!

Hello;
        i am wording on fluid dynamics, in which i can up a system of nonlinear partial differential equation with i am suppose to solve using implicit keller box method. i need an asistance on how to implement this in maple.

error module is maple.dll_unloaded

i have already called stopmaple(kv);

in

testfunction(string hello){....stopmaple(kv));

testfunction(1);

testfunction(2);

when call testfunction again , it got error

Trace  on computing the distinct-degree decomposition of the squarefree polynomial
f=x^17+2x^15+4x^13+x^12+2x^11+2x^10+3x^9+4x^4+3x^3+2x^2+4x belong to F_5[x].tell from the output only how many irreducible factors of degree i the polynomial f has, for all i.