Hello,

Maple 18. I just got a 4K monitor and the filenames and bottom toolbar are far too small. Is there any way to resize them? Does the same problem exist on later versions?

Thank you.

I was posting some code on a forum tonight. I specificially added # comments to the code. I used Ctrl_c ,Crtl_v. All the # comments were removed including the 2016 grey boxes which appeared as NULL.

Is there away around this. The comments were very important to help in understanding. The pasted code did look readable though.

I also experimented with exporting the code as .txt and opening it in Word. Required loads of editing to make it look presentable, which really opend the door to introuucing errors, also all # coments were removed too.

The forum just has the normal type comments box. Nothing fancy. Actually it is a WordPress Blog. It does accept latex but that is ok for one or two lines. Could be a real mess if 30--40 lines of code go wrong and latex as far as I know can't be copy/pasted back in to Maple.

Hi

How Maple knows free and dummy index?

Hi.  I've spent the last 5 hours or so working on a worksheet on Maple, without saving but with autosaving every 15 min. 

Maple worksheet crashed. When I opened it again, that all changes were losted! But I find autosave .bak  file. How may I open it?

Is there any way I can recover my work?

In maple we have type/symmfunc check for a symmetric function. I want to write cycfunc function.

Example: cycfunc(a^2*b + b^2*c + c^2a, [a,b,c]) return true.

Thanks you very much.

In Maple18.02:

Hso := Matrix(8, {(1, 4) = -x, (1, 6) = I*x, (2, 3) = x, (2, 5) = I*x, (3, 2) = x, (3, 5) = -I*z, (3, 8) = y, (4, 1) = -x, (4, 6) = I*z, (4, 7) = -y, (5, 2) = -I*x, (5, 3) = I*z, (5, 8) = -I*y, (6, 1) = -I*x, (6, 4) = -I*z, (6, 7) = -I*y, (7, 4) = -y, (7, 6) = I*y, (8, 3) = y, (8, 5) = I*y})

av, AV := LinearAlgebra[Eigenvectors](Hso)

Error, (in Polynomial:-Quadratic) type `truefalseFAIL` does not exist

This does not happen in Maple17.

Hi there,

I'm new here. My first question:

Is there a way to make Maple output display explicit multiplcations signs in 2D-math?

Example:
When you enter 5*2^x Maple will output . Is there a way to make Maple display the multiplications signs in output in stead just implicit multiplication signs (i.e. whitepaces)? (I would settle for Maple display all multiplication signs in output - not just the ones which are made explicit in the input.)

I searched this site. No luck. I looked into "Typesetting Rule Assistant", but I couldn't find a way to alter the output of multiplication sign (*).

Can you guys help me?

Kind Regards,

Jens

P.S.: I'm a teacher from Denmark. We use Maple before college/university for a lot of pupils. Some less competent pupils have a tendency to overlook the whitespace.

Respected member!
Please help me to find the solution of attached problem.

Download MapleN.mw

Hi guys,

I'm trying to solve this system I have but the solution doesn't display:

-I have two second degree differential equations with two functions.

-I have a set of two boundary conditions per function.

Thank you!
 

Download trial.mwtrial.mw

This is reduced from another forum.

restart;
e1 := 12*g^2+12*h^2+4*i^2+3*j^2=684;
e2 :=  12*l^2+12*m^2+4*n^2+3*o^2=684;
e3 := 12*q^2+12*r^2+4*s^2+3*t^2=172;
e4 := 12*v^2+12*w^2+4*x^2+3*y^2=108;
e5 := 12*g*l+12*h*m+4*n*i+3*j*o=-84;
e6 := 12*g*q+12*h*r+4*s*i+3*j*t=-84;
e7 := 12*g*v+12*h*w+4*x*i+3*j*y=-84;
e8 := 12*l*q+12*m*r+4*n*s+3*o*t=-84;
e9 := 12*l*v+12*m*w+4*n*x+3*o*y=-84;
e10 := 12*q*v+12*r*w+4*s*x+3*y*t=-84;
e11 := g+h+i+j=-1;
e12 := l+m+n+o=-1;
e13 := q+r+s+t=-1;
e14 := v+w+x+y=-1;
e15 := h*i+m*n+3*s*r+4*x*w=-21;
e16 := g*i+l*n+3*s*q+4*x*v=-21;
e17 := i+n+3*s+4*x=-3;
e18 := g*h+m*l+3*q*r+4*w*v=-7;
e19 := h+m+3*r+4*w=-1;
e20 := g+l+3*q+4*v=-1;
e21 := i*j+o*n+3*s*t+4*x*y=-84;
e22 := j*h+o*m+3*r*t+4*y*w=-28;
e23 := j*g+o*l+3*q*t+4*y*v=-28;
e24 := j+o+3*t+4*y=-4;
e25 := j^2+o^2+3*t^2+4*y^2=144;
e26 := i^2+n^2+3*s^2+4*x^2=129;
e27 := h^2+m^2+3*r^2+4*w^2=57;
e28 := g^2+l^2+3*q^2+4*r^2=57;

eqset := {e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6, e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12, e13, e14, e15,
          e16, e17, e18, e19, e20, e21, e22, e23, e24, e25, e26, e27, e28};
for s in eqset do print(s) end do;

Error, too many levels of recursion

If I then do

S := {1,2,3,6,3,6,8,2,3,6};

for s in S do print(s) end do;

Then,

for s in eqset do print(s) end do;

has the correct output.

What am I doing wrong?

Tom Dean

Dear All

I have a trignometric function and I plotted it in 2D. It is visible from the graph that the function has Maxima and Minima. My question is, can I located all values
 

Download Max_Min_from_Graph.mw

of "x" corresponding to these Max. and Min. ?

dy/dx=sqrt(1+(a*x)+(2*y))

for the case a=1, y=1 and x=0 construct a program for the runge-kutta method of order 2 with formulae as follows where f(x,y)=dy/dx.

k_1=h*f(x_n,y_n)

k_2=h*f(x_n+h,y_n+k_1)

y_(n+1)=y_n+1/2(k_1+k_2).

After creating a program obtain value of y correct to 4 decimal places when x=1 for h=0.1 and h =0.05.

Meanwhile, thank you so much for everything.
I know I'm asking a lot but if you have time, you can help me do this?

Building a system of interactive components that, taken a function, two points 'a' and 'b' values ​​and an integer n, the calculations point between a and b in which the function assumes the minimum value by using the following procedure:

• It divides the values ​​between a and b into n equal parts (these will distance the one with the other (b-n)/2);
• calculates the function in each of these points;
• located between these values,  what is the minimum (in case of a tie, take the one closest to a)

I think i have to create a vector for each  part and  prehaps with a fcycle for, calculate the function, finelly i'll use minimize with all function.
Do you think is the correct procedure? If yes, how can I do it?

yVal := 0.01

xVal := 0.01

p8 := plot([fdiff(('rhs')((pds:-value(f(x, y)))(x, yVal)[3]), [y, y], x = z)], z = 0 .. 20, color = [red])

I cant seem to plot the graph for yVal, but if I were to switch it around to (xVal,y), the graph works perfectly. How should I input the code such that I can obtain the f''(x,0) graph. 

Any help will be greatly appreciated :) thanks

fyp3.mw

Dear All, 

I work on the period doubling phenomenon by integrating the dynamical system at some particular parameter values. My main commands are as follows

restart:
with(DEtools): with(plots): with(plottools):
a:=-1: b:=-3: c:=3: d:=1: omega:=1: v1:=1: f:=-4: epsilon:=0.01: 
sys:=diff(u1(t),t)=v1*u1(t)-(omega+u2(t)^2)*u2(t)+u1(t)*(a*(u1(t)^2+u2(t)^2)+b*z(t)^2),
     diff(u2(t),t)=(omega+u1(t)^2)*u1(t)+v1*u2(t)+u2(t)*(a*(u1(t)^2+u2(t)^2)+b*z(t)^2),
     diff(z(t),t)=z(t)*(-v1+c*(u1(t)^2+u2(t)^2)+z(t)^2)+epsilon*z(t)*(v2+f*z(t)^4):

solC:=dsolve({eval(sys, v2=2.0500014987),
              u1(0)=0.6,u2(0)=0.6,z(0)=0.1},
              type=numeric, method=rkf45, maxfun=10^7,
              range=350..750):
p1:=odeplot(solC, [sqrt(u1(t)^2+u2(t)^2),z(t)],
               refine=2,
               color=burgundy,
               thickness=1);
 

The resulting curves are quite blurring and furry. I have tried to increase the "refine" or the "numpoints" values, but with minimal improvement. I would like to know if there a way to obtain clean and sharp integral curves?  

I would be very grateful if someone could help me! 

Thank you in advance.

With kind wishes,

Wang Zhe