Hi,

I am trying to download some MapleSim Robotic models from the Maplesoft website but I have 'Invalid File Format' error. Could you help please?

Best

Onder

Given that I use Maple as a student I've had to update to the newest version to keep using Maple.

However I find I have a lot of problems with the new version.

Normally when I write an assignement or work on the given problems I use worksheet mode because it is the best mode to spot any mistakes, and I've grown accostumed to it.

My problem however is when I have to use text.

Normally I've hit CTRL+T to get Maple to recognize that I write text, whereupon I write the given assignment, and press CTRL+J for when I want to go on and write some math. However we do have a little issue about the symbols.

Since I am an engineering student we use a lot of greek letters, and in this case I bring up sigma. In the "old" Maple I pressed F5 to get into math, write the symbol I wanted, pressed F5 again to get back to text and keep writing. In Maple 2016 however I do the same and then at the end of the text paragraph maple spits out lines of blue text with all of the "math" that I have written.


So my question is thus: Can I stop Maple from giving me the blue text, or perhaps is there another way to type symbols without having to go into math?

What is the funcional difference between individual, academic, and professional editions of Maple?

I was wondering if there is a way to represent a matrix in a reduced state.  By this I am talking about:

      | 1/3 1/3|

A:=| 1/3 1/3|  Where A is 2x2 matrix.  I would like represent it as:

           | 1 1|

A:=1/3| 1 1| is that possible with maple???

Thanks

Can Maple 17.0 work on Windows 10 Home Edition? or it can be only Windows 10 Pro Edition

how i can simplify

(f(x[n])/Df(x[n]));
in code

restart;
taylor(f(x), x = gamma, 8);
f(x[n]) := subs([x-gamma = e[n], f(gamma) = 0, seq(((D@@k)(f))(gamma) = factorial(k)*c[k]*(D(f))(gamma), k = 1 .. 1000)], %);

1 2
f(gamma) + D(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + - @@(D, 2)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)
2

1 3 1 4
+ - @@(D, 3)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + -- @@(D, 4)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)
6 24

1 5 1 6
+ --- @@(D, 5)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + --- @@(D, 6)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)
120 720

1 7 / 8\
+ ---- @@(D, 7)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + O\(x - gamma) /
5040
2 3
c[1] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + c[2] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + c[3] D(f)(gamma) e[n]

4 5 6
+ c[4] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + c[5] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + c[6] D(f)(gamma) e[n]

7 / 8\
+ c[7] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + O\e[n] /

taylor(D(f)(x), x = gamma, 8);
Df(x[n]) := subs([x-gamma = e[n], f(gamma) = 0, seq(((D@@k)(f))(gamma) = factorial(k)*c[k]*(D(f))(gamma), k = 2 .. 1000)], %);

D(f)(gamma) + @@(D, 2)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)

1 2 1 3
+ - @@(D, 3)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + - @@(D, 4)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)
2 6

1 4 1 5
+ -- @@(D, 5)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + --- @@(D, 6)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)
24 120

1 6
+ --- @@(D, 7)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma)
720

1 7 / 8\
+ ---- @@(D, 8)(f)(gamma) (x - gamma) + O\(x - gamma) /
5040
2
D(f)(gamma) + 2 c[2] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + 3 c[3] D(f)(gamma) e[n]

3 4
+ 4 c[4] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + 5 c[5] D(f)(gamma) e[n]

5 6
+ 6 c[6] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + 7 c[7] D(f)(gamma) e[n]

7 / 8\
+ 8 c[8] D(f)(gamma) e[n] + O\e[n] /

(f(x[n])/Df(x[n]));
this last term did not use f(x[n]) value from above to solve it. plxx help if any one can solve it...

when a term in the evaluation of some calculus functions particularly, i sometimes arrive at output in the general form as follows:

Algebraic expression + undefined

i am just wondering if there is a function i can call that will return the specific details as to what error the term "undefined" placeholder has stored im assuming such information is held, ie is it undefined as a consequence of the limits either side not being equal to one another or is it a 0/0 evaluation.

I am trying to do an hourly simulation of a solar-thermal system. The method I am using requires an inital guess for a value which is used in a series of equations. That variable is then back calculated, and checked against the initial guess. If it is too far off, the back calculated value is used as the new guess and so on...

My question is twofold. First, is there a way to create a sort of module that can execute a number of steps when called upon (i.e. the iterative process described above). Second, how can I run this for each hour of the year (the weather inputs for each hour will change) without manually executing each one, one at a time. So far my guess is to make a matrix with the weather inputs for each hour, and then have some sort of loop read the rows (hours) one at a time, pull the data from it, run the series of steps, and then store the output for that hour in a new matrix. Is this the best way to do this? If so, which functions/tools in Maple should I look into that can do this for me?

Thanks.

hi...please help me for solve this differential equation

thanks

warning.mw

Download warning.mw

how we insert an image in ploted graph in maple?????

Let a non-planar non-self-intersecting closed polygon in three dimensions P  be given, say
with(plots): with(plottools):
P := polygon([[0, 1, 1], [1, -1, 2], [3, 0, 5], [1, 1, 1]]):
How to find the minimal surface  with the boundary P?
There is no chance to find the solution as a closed-form expression.
Thus, the numerical solution (or/and a triangulation which approximates the minimal surface up to the given accuracy) is required.

i was wondering anyone had any advice for interpreting conformal plots vs standard plots in the context of symmetry exhibited in the conformal plot like the one attached.

Hi everybody

In the following attached file, I try to evaluate an integration, K_fL. Unfortunately, Maple does not evaluate it and just puts integration symbol and its bounds. I want to have final integration value. Is there any solution to this integration or maybe Maple can not solve this integration because of the complexity of integrand?

Thanks in advance

Q1.mw

Sorry when referencing something written in  explianatory notes in the function advisor / help pages, who do i quote as being  the author?

suppose one has a solution to a system of equations that returns results as RootOf(X) expressions. I would like to know if there is a procedure for extracting the "X" from the RootOf for the purpose of further algebraic analysis.