Maple code when open saved maple sheet?

and keep it can run code and show latest result after open

i mean user can not extend or find code or display code in maple sheet , just can run result

Hello all

I am trying to write  a tutorial about systems of linear equations, and I want to demonstrate the idea that when you have a system of 3 euqtions with 3 unknowns, the solution is the intersection point between these planes. Plotting 3 planes in Maple 2015 is fairly easy (you plot one and just drag the others in), but I don't know how to plot the intersection point. Can you help please ?

My equations are:

x-2y+z=0

2y-8z=8

-4x+5y+9z=-9

The intersection point is (29,16,3)

Thank you !

Heun.mw

Download Heun.mw

Hi all

I want to know if there's any plot for the function:

Dear all,

I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out some error messages in the Maple debugger. When I debug some procedures I'm getting error messages like "Error, invalid input: %1 expects its %-2 argument, %3, to be of type %4, but received %5". Since the procedure calls a lot of other procedures I have to check every single one of them, to see, which one gives me the error message. It would be easier if I would know, what procedure/type hides behind the variables %1,... Is there a way to check this from within the debugger?

Thanks a lot.

Why have there been so many old Posts and Questions moving to the top of the Active Conversations stack the past two days, even though they have no new activity? This makes MaplePrimes very difficult to use! Please make it so that the Active Conversations stack is sorted by the actual time of the most-recent addition to the thread.

I want to write a procedure which recieves a natural N and print all the possible 2ˆN sequences of zeros and ones with size N.

 For instance, if I set N = 3; my procedure returns a set with 8 lists of zeros and ones: [[0,0,0],[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1][1,0,1],[0,1,1],[1,1,1]] ;

Many thanks!

Im working on an assignment involving a rocket being launched vertically from rest. 
I have a eq. of motion that looks like this: v(t)=vs*ln(-m0/(r*t-m0))-g*t

Now Im supposed to implement the air resistance, and write an expression for the total force on the rocket. After that creating a plot displaying the speed v(t) as a function of time for both, with and without air resistance. 

All constants are known including CD, rho and A for the dragforce. 

I would be grateful if anyone could help me with this!

Thanks

Hello altogether,

I want to plot the numerical result of an ODE, which seems to be pretty simple at first sight, but the difficulty is that the boundaries are depending on the solution.

The following pseudo-code describes what I want to have, but it doesn't work. This code fills the RAM pretty fast and you will have to kill the process.

Free-boundary_prob.mw

Is it possible to calculate a solution to this problem numerically (or even analytically) and if yes, how?

Since I am new here, I am sorry for any bad-to-read maple code or any noob errors I have made. I would be very thankful, for any response and help.

Greetings

butterflyfart

Hi

I wrote a custom recursive procedure to calculate some value (it is an implementation of a recursive algorithm)
During the further calculations derivatives of this procedure occur. Because of the statements in the specific procedure the automatic diff of a procedure does not work (at least I think that is the reason). However this is no problem as the differentiation is far from simple. L'hopitals rule needs to be used when necessary and Maple cannot detect when it needs to be used automatically (because there is another function, implicitly defined involved).
Therefore I am looking to write my own diff procedure as an extension. From the manual I gathered that this can be done as such `diff/name_of_type' =... however my procedure is not a type and I cannot easily write a 'type/name_of_type' function to define it as such. Can someone help me out?

I've made a toy example:

toy_example.mw

I know that in the case of this toy example other ways are possible.
What I need is a way to write my own procedure to evaluate the differential (D[1](A))(1,2,3);

Possibly defining procedure A as a type and writing 'diff/A'=proc...

Thanks

Hello,

I have a two variable function d(a,b) which i don't want to substitute for the result. How can I make this product distributive,e.g. d(a+b,c)=d(a,c)+d(b,c) with independece of the variables I introduce in the function?

Thank you for the help!

EF.3.mwHi, I want to ask that how to find the exact solution of equation without applying any technique

Hi all,

I had to do a clean install on my computer today. When I went to reinstall Maple, I got a message telling me that my download link wasn't valid. So I tried to get a new download link, but that didn't work either. Does anyone know if I will still be able to download the software without purchasing the latest version? I'm pretty sure my license has not expired.

I'm going to call support tomorrow morning, but I figured I'd ask around here in the meantime. Thanks!

Hello.

When I input an expression such as 3*(2*x-1)(x+1) > 0 into a Maple worksheet, Maple outputs this:

0 < 6*x(x+1)-3

(sorry, the formatter doesn't work for some reason).

I was wondering by which rules Maple determines to output that instead of, for example,

0 < 3(2*x^2+x-1)

or

0 < 6*x^2+3x-3

Also, Maple can't seem to be able to solve the inequality. It gives the following error to the command:

solve( { 3*(2*x-1)(1+x) > 0 } );

Error, (in solve) cannot solve for an unknown function with other operations in its arguments

So, I was wondering, is there a way to force Maple to output either in the most factorized form (which should be what I gave it as input) or in the least factorized form (that is, multiply it all)?

And, of course, why can't I solve the inequality with Maple?

Im working on a assignment on maple. I have an equation of motion that looks like this:  v(t):= -g*t-vs*ln(r*t-m)+vs*ln(-m)
Im supposed to use this equation and solve it for t an later integrate it. Since the constant inside the ln is negative I end up with a annoying imaginary part. Is there any way to covert this equation so that the ln disappear, so that I can get a result whitout a imaginary part?