Pls, I tried solving the system of PDE numerically.... When I did for just 1 plot, the graph was plotted easilyrunning.mw but When I varied some parameters its not coming out.... Also, its not bringing any error so I can't trace out my mistakes....Not_runnin.mw PLS HELP ME OUT with the multiple plots... Attached are my source codes links....

Hello,

I have trouble in using the function factors. For example, I expect

factor(Pi*(t^2+1), {I});

to output

-Pi*(-t+I)*(t+I)

but instead the result is

Pi*(t^2+1)

This problem does not appear if Pi gets replaced by a general symbol:

factor(pi*(t^2+1), {I});

produces (as I expect it should)

-pi*(-t+I)*(t+I)

The problem seems to be tied to symbols representing constants, as for example replacing Pi by Catalan also results in no factorization being performed. It further seems to be tied to specifying a splitting field, because

factor(Pi*(t^2-1));

results in

Pi*(t-1)*(t+1)

Is this behaviour intended? Probably the reason is that the polynomial does not have algebraic coefficients (as it includes Pi). Indeed,

factor(Pi*(t^2-1),{});

produces the error message

Error, (in factor) expecting a polynomial over an algebraic number field

But why does this error then not appear for the call factor(Pi*(t^2-1))? If this would assume complex coefficients, it should factor using I. Considering coefficients in an algebraic number field, also the original call factor(Pi*(t^2+1), {I}); should raise an error!?

Thanks,

Erik

When using Maximize, is it possible to now what parameter settings that resulted in complex numbers?

KR Fredrik

Maximize(Eq1_new, {R_K*rho*`&sigma;_K`+R_S*`&sigma;_S` >= .38780613588076011954, r_K*rho*`&sigma;_K`+r_S*`&sigma;_S` >= .21290471165685214846, R_K*rho*`&sigma;_K`+R_S*`&sigma;_S` <= .38780613588076011954, r_K*rho*`&sigma;_K`+r_S*`&sigma;_S` <= .21290471165685214846});

Error, (in Optimization:-NLPSolve) complex value encountered

intsolve(int(f1(u)*(x-y), u = a .. b) = (12)*cos(x)+5*x^2-12, f1(x));I try to resolve the integral equation but i received all the time the followinf message error 

Error, (in intsolve) invalid input: rhs received {f1(x) = ?}, which is not valid for its 1st argument, expr
I try to use different form but i do not how to resolve the help center do not help to much.

I preciate any help thanks

Which book is the starting point and have examples

Hi.

please, I need some code about stepsize adaptative Runge Kutta method ( any order ) or other methods.

Thanks

I am trying to produce an animation. Everything seems correct, but the evaluation is taking a very long time. Even after an hour, it still tries to crank out a graph for me. I even tried to truncate the integral!

Here is my code.

with(plots):

z:= x -> 2*(int((sin(2*y)-sin(y))*cos(y*x)*exp(-y^2*t)/y, y = 0 .. 200))/Pi;

animate(plot, [z(x), x = 0 .. 10, y = -.1 .. 2], t = 0 .. 1, frames = 100);

Would could be the problem? 

Hi all

How to read a value from keyboard of PC when executing a maple document and assign it to a variable ?

Thanks

Dear the specialst in programmation, please I need to put a conditon if in this procedure with this form: Can you correct me this code please. Thank you.


aaa:=proc(x,y,f,N)
local bb,
for i= from 1 to N do

bb[i]:=f(x[i],y);

if bb[i]<=2 then y:=3*x[i] else y::=x[i]^2end if ;

end do:

end proc

> with(DEtools);
> L := -1.576674; MU := 0; DE13 := {(D(x))(t) = x(t)*(1+4*x(t)*x(t)-y(t)*y(t))+MU*y(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-.43*y(t)*y(t)-L), (D(y))(t) = y(t)*(1+x(t)*x(t)-.5*y(t)*y(t))+MU*x(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-.43*y(t)*y(t)-L)}; DEplot(DE13, [x(t), y(t)], t = 0 .. 20, [[x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .99], [x(0) = -.1, y(0) = -.9], [x(0) = 1.1, y(0) = 0], [x(0) = 0, y(0) = .2], [x(0) = 0, y(0) = .6], [x(0) = .6, y(0) = 0], [x(0) = .75, y(0) = 1], [x(0) = .1, y(0) = .1], [x(0) = .5, y(0) = 1.0], [x(0) = -.5, y(0) = 1], [x(0) = .5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = -.5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = -0.1e-1, y(0) = .99], [x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = -.99], [x(0) = -0.1e-1, y(0) = -.99], [x(0) = .5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = -.5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .9]], stepsize = 0.1e-1, scene = [x(t), y(t)], title = "phaseplane 3 prime plot", linecolor = black, thickness = 1);
-1.576674
0
/ / 2 2\
{ D(x)(t) = x(t) \1 + 4 x(t) - y(t) /,
\

/ 2 2\\
D(y)(t) = y(t) \1 + x(t) - 0.5 y(t) / }
/
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .93908020e-1, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .26367741, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .23463732, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of 1.7040014, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity

what do i need to do so there are no more singularites?

i cant find the error the program is saying i have 

> L := -1.576674; MU := 0; DE13 := {D(y)*t = -x(t)*(1-2*x(t)*x(t))+MU*y(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-3*y(t)*y(t)-L), (D(x))(t) = y(t)*(1-y(t)*y(t))+MU*y(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-3*y(t)*y(t)-L)}; DEplot(DE13, [x(t), y(t)], t = -20 .. 20, [[x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .99], [x(0) = 0.5e-1, y(0) = .95], [x(0) = .1, y(0) = .9], [x(0) = 0.4e-1, y(0) = .96]], stepsize = 0.1e-2, scene = [x(t), y(t)], title = "phaseplane plot", linecolor = black, thickness = 1, number = 1000);
 
Error, (in DEtools/DEplot/CheckInitial) too few initial conditions: [x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .99]

it might be hard to read but if someone could help me it would be very appreciated 

int(BesselJ(2, r*k)*BesselJ(1, 1500*k), k = 0 .. infinity);

(of course, calculated numerically) against r=0..40 ?

PS. It is possible in Mathematica 9.0.1.0 .

I have a procedure which give an approximate solution for ode.

This our procedure

RKadaptivestepsize := proc (f, a, b, epsilon, N).

It's working ( afther some 3 mistake found by a member in Mapleprime).

Then I would like to compute the error between exact and approximate.

RKadaptivestepsize: compute the approximate solution

analyticsol: analytic solution

## here, I compute the error
for N from 2 by 2 to 500 do
dataerror:= N->evalf(abs(RKadaptivestepsize(f,0,1,epsilon,N)[1+N][2]-(eval(analyticsol, x = 1))));
##  sequence of data error
data[error] := [seq([N, dataerror(N)], N = 2 .. 500, 2)]:
if  data[error][k][2]<=epsilon then   
printf("%a  is the number of steps required using 3-step Runge Kutta Method to achieve an  eroor of 1e-6 .", k)
break ;
end if;   
end do;
end do;

But its gives an error.: Error, reserved word `error` unexpected

Have any one an idea.

Hello,

I am having trouble using the programmer entry point interface to convert/parfrac. As an example consider : While

> convert([x, [I*(x+I), 1]], parfrac, x);                   

         [-I, [(I + x) I, -I]]

correctly computes a partial fraction decomposition, the equivalent input

> convert([x, [I*x-1, 1]], parfrac, x);  

results in the error message (both in Maple 16 and 17)

Error, (in convert/parfrac) denominator factors must be coprime

which does not make any sense to me, since there is only a single denominator factor present (and it is even the same factor as in the previous call, only written differently).

What is the reason for this behaviour and how can I use convert/parfrac in a way that avoids such errors?

Thanks,

Erik

I am trying to numerically evaluate the following integral

I have currently used the maple commands

int(exp(10*(-2*y^2+y^4))*exp(-10*(-2*z^2+z^4)), [z = -infinity .. y, y = -1 .. 0], numeric)

evalf(int(exp(10*(-2*y^2+y^4))*exp(-10*(-2*z^2+z^4)), [z = -infinity .. y, y = -1 .. 0]))

evalf(Int(exp(10*(-2*y^2+y^4))*exp(-10*(-2*z^2+z^4)), [z = -infinity .. y, y = -1 .. 0]))

but all of them return the integral unevaluated. Any help?