MaplePrimes Questions

PLEASE..!! CAN ANYONE HELP ME IN CODING ON MAPPLE 13 TO CHANGE PDE INTO ODE??

MY FUNCTION IS THIS

U[t, t]-U[t, t, x, x]-(aU[]-b*U[]^3)[x, x] = 0

Should restart always be in separate execution group? I noticed when I write something like

>restart;
  foo:=proc()
  local sys;
  with(DynamicSystems):
  sys := TransferFunction(25/(s^2+4*s+25)):
  print(ResponsePlot(sys, Step(),duration=4));
end proc;
>

then type foo(); in the next execution group, it does not work. The plot is not generated. No matter how many times I evaluate the execution group. The proc() does not seem to be fully defined. But if I do this:

>restart;  #hit return
>foo:=proc()
  local sys;
  with(DynamicSystems):
  sys := TransferFunction(25/(s^2+4*s+25)):
  print(ResponsePlot(sys, Step(),duration=4));
end proc;
>#hit another return

and now calling foo(); then it works, and the proc() returns the plot. Only difference is that restart was in separate group. But also I had to call foo() once, then evaluate the execution group where foo() is defined two times ! for it to work (why two times?) why one time did not work? is it becuase I am loading package inside the proc()?

What are the rules for putting the restart() call? Should it always be in separate group? I put it in the same group, so that I do not have to hit return 2 times, being a lazy person. But it seems to cause problem sometimes.

And related question, why did I have to hit return 2 times in the execution group to have proc() work in the second case above?

 

Here is my unsuccessful try

>restart; plots:-contourplot(exp(2*x/(x^2+y^2)), x = -2 .. 2, y = -2 .. 2,
grid = [100, 100], coloring = [blue, red], contours = [.1, .3, .5, 1, 2]);

                                                                                 

Hi everybody,

I have some experimental data from an oscillating system (time domaine) and I would like to get an approximation of the damping ratio (zeta). I have already try to use the half-power band width method with the vibrationdata Matlab package designed by Tom Irvine. But I would like to double-check the result with another method.

I found several methods in this paper and I would like to try to do the curve fitting method with the Curve Fitting Toolbox of Maple or Matlab (R2014b) (2.2.2 Curve fitting in the paper). data.txt

It's the first I use this Toolbox with a custom equation, so, I do not really know how to do it with my sample data.

Can anybody help me with this ? I have attached the .txt file sample data to this post.

Cheers

Hi,

 

I was wondering how to go about plotting a Fourier Tranform in Maple.

My assignment is to plot a simple harmonic equation as a Fourier transform, depicting amplitude against fequency.

I've been given: x'' + w^2 x = 0

And want to obtain both the f(x) = a0 sin(wt) + b0cos(wt) form, and a graph of the the amplitude (c^2 =a0^2 + b0^2) against frequency.

I know how to do this on paper but not in Maple, so any help with line commands and layout would be very much appreciated.

 

Thanks

PrimesQuestion.mw

Please let me know if this link correctly accesses my worksheet. If not, I will copy its contents into this question.

Which ODE in the worksheet, if any, provides the correct answer?


restart

f := proc (x) local t; if not type(evalf(x), 'numeric') then ('procname')(x) else evalf(Int(exp(-(1/10)*t^2), t = 0 .. x)) end if end proc

solA := dsolve({diff(y(x), x) = y(x)+f(x), y(0) = 0}, numeric, known = f)

solA(1)

[x = 1., y(x) = HFloat(0.7081492947996167)]

(1)

f2 := evalf(Int(exp(-(1/10)*t^2), t = 0 .. 1)); f(1)

.9676433126

 

.9676433126

(2)

solB := dsolve({diff(y(x), x) = y(x)+f2, y(0) = 0}, numeric, output = listprocedure)

solB(1)

[x(1) = 1., (y(x))(1) = HFloat(1.6626837619970016)]

(3)

YinSolB := subs(solB, y(x))

YinSolBeval := solve(YinSolB(a) = .7081, a); solB(YinSolBeval)

.5491485953

 

[x(.5491485953) = .5491485953, (y(x))(.5491485953) = HFloat(0.7081000000284681)]

(4)

NULL


 

Hi,

I'm trying to work out whether or not Maple will be able to help me out with some algebra involving lots of indices, but I can't seem to work out how the gauge indices features work in the Physics package. For example I would like to define a gauge field carrying an SU(3) index and a spacetime index. The SU(3) index should run from 1 to 8 and the spacetime index from 1 to 5. I think I have worked out how it works with spacetime indices but I can't seem to find any documentation on the gauge indices.

Is there are a way to set the "dimension" of the gauge index, like we can set the space time dimension?

 

Cheers

Hi,

  I would need to get access to the values of euler angles defining the orientation of a 3D plot.

I generate the 3D plot with a given orientation, then the user is allowed to rotate it with mouse orbit. How can I get the values of the new euler angles to use them in further computations?

In the plot/structure I cannot find any data concerned with orientation...

 

Thank you.

 

Marco

Hi,

I am trying to solve an equation and plot it as an implicit plot, I would like to increase the number of points in the plot calculation but it seems that there is a limit for it, I chose 10^8 and for a bigger values I get an memorry error from Maple. Is there anyway I can solve this problem?

This is just for an example:

implicitplot(subs({values = ...}), function), for a given values, numpoints=10^8)

 

Regards,

Baharm31

Is there a simple way to see wich packages that I have loaded, without being forced to see thru the entire document?

I'd like to differentiate  3*(r/sqrt(a))+ (r/sqrt(a))^2  w.r.t  r/sqrt(a) and obtain

    3 + 2* (r/sqrt(a))

in otherwords, treat (r/sqrt(a)) as a single variable. This is what I tried:

restart;
v:=r/sqrt(a);    #the single expression to differentiate w.r.t
p:=x->x^2+3*x;
expr:=Diff(p(v),v);
algsubs(v=x,expr);
algsubs(x=v,value(%));

The problem is that when doing x^2 and x is r/sqrt(a), then it become r^2/a and it does not remain (r/sqrt(a))^2, so now the algsubs does not "see" it. I get as final answer

ofcourse, one can now try to simplify the above to the required form, maybe using assumptions or by dividing by sqrt(a) the numerator and denominator of the first term above to get  3+2*(r/sqrt(a)) but this is all requires extra work and can be hard depending on the result.

is there a better way to do the above so it works in general? The problem is in the function p, I need a way to tell Maple now to simplify it somehow. In Mathematica, I can do this like this:

Clear[p, x, r, a]
p[x_] := x^2 + 3*x;
v = r/Sqrt[a];
With[{v = x}, Inactive[D][p[v], v]];
Activate[%];
% /. x -> v

 

 

Hello Maple primers

I am trying to do a coordinate transformation which involves a number of partial derivatives. I turned to the PDETools[dchange] to accomplish this but it will just return 0 when run through.

The problem is as such. First two functions are defined which contain a lot of "stuff". Then the forward and reverse transformations are defined between the coordinates; and finally the transformation is done.

   del_1:=Diff(Y,r1,r1)+2/r1*(Diff(Y,r1)) + Diff(Y,r2,r2)+2/r2*(Diff(Y,r2))+2*(Diff(Y,r3,r3))+4/r3*(Diff(Y,r3))+((r1^2-r2^2+r3^2)/(r1*r3))*(Diff(Y,r1,r3))+(r2^2-r1^2+r3^2)/(r2*r3)*(Diff(Y,r2,r3)):

   del_2:=Diff(Y,r1,r1)+2/r1*(Diff(Y,r1))+(r1^2-r2^2+r3^2)/(r1*r3)*Diff(Y,r1,r3)+Diff(Y,r2,r2)+2/r2*(Diff(Y,r2))+(-r1^2+r2^2+r3^2)/(r2*r3)*(Diff(Y,r2,r3))+4/r3*(Diff(Y,r3))+2*(Diff(Y,r3,r3)):

#Forward transformation

R1:=0.5*(v)+0.25*(w):
R2:=0.5*(u)+0.25*(w):
R3:=0.5*(u)+0.5*(v):

tr:={r1=R1,r2=R2,r3=R3}:

#Reverse transformation
rR1:=(-r1+r2+r3):
rR2:=(r1-r2+r3):
rR3:=2*(r1+r2-r3):

rtr:={u=rR1,v=rR2,w=rR3}:
nv:={u,v,w}:
AA:=simplify(del_1+del_2);
PDEtools[dchange](tr,AA,nv,rtr);

This will return zero. Is there something obvious I am missing here? I have used the dchange tool before in a similar manner and it has worked without issue.

I have a system of equations in several variables and I just need one numerical solution of it, I tryed to use fsolve of Maple but it always show me some errors or gives back the command as the output.

aaghulu := {-6-4*y-x-(1+y)*x+sqrt((4*(1+y))*(2+x)*(4+2*y+x)+(-(1+y)*x+2+x)^2), (2*(4+2*y+x))*(1+y)-(1+y)*x+2+x+sqrt((4*(1+y))*(2+x)*(4+2*y+x)+(-(1+y)*x+2+x)^2)-(2+y)*(-(1+y)*x+2+x+sqrt((4*(1+y))*(2+x)*(4+2*y+x)+(-(1+y)*x+2+x)^2))};

fsolve(aaghulu, {x, y}, maxsols = 1);

 

I will be happy if someone guide me how to do these kinds of things using Maple.

Using worksheet, in 2015. I have an execution group, such as

>....code
....
...

>... another execution group

 

And want to copy all the code from the first group, using the mouse. Is there another way, other than having to move the mouse by hand and select all the code in order to copy it?  In Mathematica, I can right-click on the cell edge, and select copy. This copies the cell to the buffer, then one can paste the code somewhere else. In Maple, I could not duplicate this behaviour which is annoying when one wants to copy large amount of code.

I found that if I put the code in a "code edit region", ie., do insert->code edit region, then right-click inside the small window of the code edit region, the copy is enabled, so I can copy the whole region without manually select it first.

But this does not work outside the code edit region.

This is a stripped down example of something I've been doing. Basically I'm building matrices which I then, using unapply, convert into functions of some variables of t.
.... but found that simplify seems to often not work as i'd wish.
 

restart:
mm:=Matrix([[cos(sqrt(g__1^2)*t), (-I*g__1*sin(sqrt(g__1^2)*t))*(1/sqrt(g__1^2))], [(-I*g__1*sin(sqrt(g__1^2)*t))*(1/sqrt(g__1^2)) ,cos(sqrt(g__1^2)*t)]]);

#great - simplifies as i'd expect:
simplify(mm) assuming g__1::positive;

Do the same thing but when matrix is a function of t
mmFun:=unapply(mm, t);

#the function works - gives what i'd expect
mmFun(3); mmFun(t);

#but now the simplification does not work - why the g__1 in the argument of cos does not get properly simplified?
simplify(mmFun(t)) assuming g__1::positive;

Any ideas if this is a bug? I'm using maple 2015.2 on linux 64-bit.

here is the worksheet: simplify_issue.mw

thanks

EDIT:

as a side note once can sometimes overcome this with mapping simplify  as in :

map(simplify, resultMatrix ) assuming g__1::positive;

but this is not optimal, and sometimes does not work when i first multiply the matrix by say a vector.

 

 

 

First 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 Last Page 1177 of 2429