## 155 Reputation

7 years, 235 days

## Displaying Large Matricies and Vectors...

Maple 2015

I am using a stoiciometric matrix to generate a system of differential equations (this makes them easier to check). There are 13 chemical species and 16 reactions so I need to make and display vectors of length 13 and 16; as well as a 13x16 matrix.

When I make Vectors of this size they don't get displayed; I just get information about the vector (Fortran order etc) and this is the same for the matrix.

How do i make/edit/display Matrixes nd Vectors of this size?

## Seq behaves funny within a program...

Maple 18

I am trying to do some algebra with the derivatives of some variables within a program. As a result i need to relable them before i feed them into solve.

To relable them i create vectors and use subs. one of these vectors behaves differently within a proc to how it behaves outside it. This is weird.

TimefullBehavesFunny := proc (nPars, nVars)
local nDiffs, timefull, timeless;
nDiffs := nPars;
timefull := [seq(dx[j, i] = diff(x[i](t), `\$`(t, j)), i = 1 .. nVars)];
timefull := [seq(op(timefull), j = 0 .. nDiffs), seq(x[i] = x[i](t), i = 1 .. nVars)];
timeless := `~`[`=`](`~`[rhs](timefull), `~`[lhs](timefull));
timefull, timeless, nDiffs;
end proc

When i run the above for (3,3) i get a differet result to when i run the following
nVars:=3;
nDiffs := 3;
timefull := [seq(dx[j, i] = diff(x[i](t), `\$`(t, j)), i = 1 .. nVars)];
timefull := [seq(op(timefull), j = 0 .. nDiffs), seq(x[i] = x[i](t), i = 1 .. nVars)];
timeless := `~`[`=`](`~`[rhs](timefull), `~`[lhs](timefull));

and similarly for other numbers.

any ideasas to why?

## How to show odeplot better?...

Maple 2015

I have a set of differential equations on 3 variables, B[1],B[2] and C. Its not physically meaningful for B[1]+B[2]>0.5 so i would ideally like to replace the cube that the solutions are displayed on (the axis take the limits B[1]=0...0.5,B[2]=0...0.5,C=0...100 ) with a triangular prism (the axis take the limits B[1]=0...0.5,B[2]=0...0.5,B[1]+B[2]<0.5,C=0...100 ).

Failing that i'd like the plot to display a plane showing where the meaningful values for the variables end.

here is the code I use to put the ODEplot together

Model := [diff(B[1](t), t) = k[a1]*C(t)*(R-B[1](t)-B[2](t))-k[d1]*B[1](t), diff(B[2](t), t) = k[a2]*C(t)*(R-B[1](t)-B[2](t))-k[d2]*B[2](t), diff(C(t), t) = (-(k[a1]+k[a2])*C(t)*(R-B[1](t)-B[2](t))+k[d1]*B[1](t)+k[d2]*B[2](t)+k[m]*((I)(t)-C(t)))/h];
DissMod := subs((I)(t) = 0, Model);
AssMod := subs((I)(t) = C[T], Model);

Pars1a := [k[a1] = 6*10^(-4), k[d1] = 7*10^(-3), k[a2] = 6*10^(-4), k[d2] = (7/5)*10^(-3), R = .5, k[m] = 10^(-4), C[T] = 100, h = 10^(-6)];

Pars := Pars1a; thing11 := subs(Pars, AssMod[1]), subs(Pars, AssMod[2]); thing12 := diff(C(t), t) = piecewise(t <= 100, subs(Pars, rhs(AssMod[3])), subs(Pars, rhs(DissMod[3]))); sol := dsolve({thing11, thing12, C(0) = 0, B[1](0) = 0, B[2](0) = 0}, {C(t), B[1](t), B[2](t)}, numeric, output = listprocedure, maxstep = 2, maxfun = 1000000); ParsPlot1a := odeplot(sol, [B[1](t), B[2](t), C(t)], t = 0 .. 700, color = blue, view = [0 .. .5, 0 .. .5, 0 .. 100], tickmarks = [[0 = 0, .5 = R], [0 = 0, .5 = R], [0 = 0, 25 = (1/4)*C[T], 50 = (1/2)*C[T], 100 = C[T]]]);

But I can't see a way of either making the plane or making the ODEplot axis into something other than a cube.

## Strange output of diff...

Maple

I have a pair of linear functions I want to differentiate wrt time. The first line defines the functions, and thesecond a substitution that tells maple that the variables of these linear functions, are themselves functions of time.

F := Vector([p[1]*p[6]*(p[2]-x[1]-x[2])-p[3]*x[1], p[4]*p[6]*(p[2]-x[1]-x[2])-p[5]*x[2]])
timefull := [x[1] = x[1](t), x[2] = x[2](t)]

This line should give the ith derivative

Fdiffi := [diff(subs(timefull, F[1]), t\$i), diff(subs(timefull, F[2]), t\$i)]

however maple gives me a responce in terms of the pochammer function. Why is this? How do i avoid it?

## Logplot of ODE solution...

Maple

I have some differential equations that I want to plot on the same axis (as i have below), but would like to plot with a log scale to illustrate the fact that one is simply a logarithmic decay (solid line) and all the others are not.

I had used deplot and display to make the above graph,

but if you want more detail, here is a worksheet with the relevant differntial equations: