Just applying expand, without any IntegrationTools, will also do the trick.

I had a similiar experience in the thread "Log scale with implicitplot": I could post Answers, but not Replies. I was able to post an Answer and then convert it to a Reply. It is also happening in this thread: I can post a Comment, but not a reply.

(I am only providing all this boring information in the hopes that it might help the Administrators fix this bug.)

Please post your code, or at least show the results of the command op(P). Also, is your curve connected? And what version of Maple are you using?

Please post your code, or at least show the results of the command op(P). Also, is your curve connected? And what version of Maple are you using?

The "something went wrong" bug seems to be user-dependent and thread-consistent. That is, I cannot Comment or Reply in the post "Updates to MaplePrimes" no matter when I try, but Christopher can post in that thread, but I guess that he is getting the bug on other threads. Christopher, is that right? Also, I wonder if this bug only affects moderators.

Is the structure being plotted simply a curve? Or are there filled regions or other embellishments?

What do you intend to do with this Matrix once you have it saved or exported? You mentioned MS-Word, so is this Matrix just for display in a document? Or do you intend to do some computation with it after it is saved/exported?

What do you intend to do with this Matrix once you have it saved or exported? You mentioned MS-Word, so is this Matrix just for display in a document? Or do you intend to do some computation with it after it is saved/exported?

The Asker needs an arbitrary numbers of dimensions rather than dynamic sizing with a fixed number of dimensions.

The Asker needs an arbitrary numbers of dimensions rather than dynamic sizing with a fixed number of dimensions.

Also, you should either remove display from your procedure, or replace it with plots:-display. If you are passing a single plot into the procedure, then display is superfluous.

Also, you should either remove display from your procedure, or replace it with plots:-display. If you are passing a single plot into the procedure, then display is superfluous.

You should include fclose(fileName). I think this will preclude the need for Threads[Sleep]. Even if it doesn't completely eliminate the need for Sleep, you should include it anyway.

You should include fclose(fileName). I think this will preclude the need for Threads[Sleep]. Even if it doesn't completely eliminate the need for Sleep, you should include it anyway.

@Christopher2222 Is a Mathematica plot an accessible data structure the way that a Maple PLOT is? something that can be assigned to a variable? taken apart with the equivalent of op? Does it even have something like op?