Teep

185 Reputation

5 Badges

14 years, 214 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by Teep

@tomleslie 

 

Yes ... that does the trick!

Thanks a lot - I'm grateful.

@Carl Love 

Yes indeed .... I frequently lost my connection also for small p.

I figured it was pc-related rather than numerical computation issues, so I removed firewall, re-booted, etc. but it still made no difference.  

@acer 

Nice model. I varied the parameter values across my range of interest and it produces outputs in quick time.

Thanks very much .... and thanks again to all who worked on this.

@Carl Love 

This looks very interesting for small p values. I'll apply this to my problem. 

Thanks for the creative input (as usual!).

@acer 

 

Interesting and useful routine .. thanks for this insight.

 

@epostma 

At least some good arises!

I'm glad you picked this up, Erik - thanks for informing us.

Is it possible to obtain a pre-release version of the fix before the next release?

 

@mmcdara 

That's a beautiful method of solution .... such a simple and creative approach.

Again - thanks for this. 

@mmcdara 

 

Now, that's impressive! I'll take this into consideration.

Thank's for the guidance and quick response.

@mmcdara 

 I appreciate this. Nice code.

This works nicely when p=0.5.

However, when p is adjusted to p=0.05, the processing time remains excessive. I ran this for 10 minutes and decided to stop the computation. 

NBD_Issue.mw

@tomleslie 

Thanks. I hope you can access the code here.

I'll try the 'numeric' option.

 

Thank you! That did the trick!

@tomleslie 

First off, thanks for your work and response. Much appreciated. I didn't consider the adjacency matrix approach. In this case, I have 14 nodes / vertices and 16 arcs / edges; the circuit commences from node 1. 

I think that, between your solution and that of mmcdara, I'll have a better insight into the treatment of such problems ..... all good fun!

Thanks again ...

@mmcdara 

Thanks for this - much appreciated. 

I am considering case 2 so I think this should do the trick!

@acer 

Thanks for the suggestion - most interesting.

Actually, I initially required a surface approximation; the interpolation is interesting ... I never considered that option but will certainly look into this option.

 

Thanks again ...

@Carl Love 

This is appreciated .... many thanks, Carl.

4 5 6 7 8 9 Page 6 of 9