185 Reputation

5 Badges

14 years, 214 days

MaplePrimes Activity

These are replies submitted by Teep



Yes ... that does the trick!

Thanks a lot - I'm grateful.

@Carl Love 

Yes indeed .... I frequently lost my connection also for small p.

I figured it was pc-related rather than numerical computation issues, so I removed firewall, re-booted, etc. but it still made no difference.  


Nice model. I varied the parameter values across my range of interest and it produces outputs in quick time.

Thanks very much .... and thanks again to all who worked on this.

@Carl Love 

This looks very interesting for small p values. I'll apply this to my problem. 

Thanks for the creative input (as usual!).



Interesting and useful routine .. thanks for this insight.



At least some good arises!

I'm glad you picked this up, Erik - thanks for informing us.

Is it possible to obtain a pre-release version of the fix before the next release?



That's a beautiful method of solution .... such a simple and creative approach.

Again - thanks for this. 



Now, that's impressive! I'll take this into consideration.

Thank's for the guidance and quick response.


 I appreciate this. Nice code.

This works nicely when p=0.5.

However, when p is adjusted to p=0.05, the processing time remains excessive. I ran this for 10 minutes and decided to stop the computation. 



Thanks. I hope you can access the code here.

I'll try the 'numeric' option.


Thank you! That did the trick!


First off, thanks for your work and response. Much appreciated. I didn't consider the adjacency matrix approach. In this case, I have 14 nodes / vertices and 16 arcs / edges; the circuit commences from node 1. 

I think that, between your solution and that of mmcdara, I'll have a better insight into the treatment of such problems ..... all good fun!

Thanks again ...


Thanks for this - much appreciated. 

I am considering case 2 so I think this should do the trick!


Thanks for the suggestion - most interesting.

Actually, I initially required a surface approximation; the interpolation is interesting ... I never considered that option but will certainly look into this option.


Thanks again ...

@Carl Love 

This is appreciated .... many thanks, Carl.

4 5 6 7 8 9 Page 6 of 9