Maple 16 Questions and Posts Maple 16 Questions and Posts Feed

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple 16

To motivate some ideas in my research, I've been looking at the expected number of real roots of random polynomials (and their derivatives).  In doing so I have noticed an issue/bug with fsolve and RootFinding[Isolate].  One of the polynomials I came upon was

f(x) = -32829/50000-(9277/50000)*x-(37251/20000)*x^2-(6101/6250)*x^3-(47777/20000)*x^4+(291213/50000)*x^5.

We know that f(x) has at least 1 real root and, in fact, graphing shows that f(x) has exactly 1 real root (~1.018).  However, fsolve(f) and Isolate(f) both return no real roots.  On the other hand, Isolate(f,method=RC) correctly returns the root near 1.018.  I know that fsolve's details page says "It may not return all roots for exceptionally ill-conditioned polynomials", though this system does not seem especially ill-conditioned.  Moreover, Isolate's help page says confidently "All significant digits returned by the program are correct, and unlike purely numerical methods no roots are ever lost, although repeated roots are discarded" which is clearly not the case here.  It also seems interesting that the RealSolving package used by Isolate(f,method=RS) (default method) misses the root while the RegularChains package used by Isolate(f,method=RC) correctly finds the root.

 All-in-all, I am not sure what to make of this.  Is this an issue which has been fixed in more recent incarnations of fsolve or Isolate?  Is this a persistent problem?  Is there a theoretical reason why the root is being missed, particularly for Isolate?

Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,

I need to transfer an array of size (M,N) from maple to matlab. But i dont know how to make it. Please help me for this. Thanx in advance.

Regards

Sunit

i := I;

assume(a>0);

assume(b>0);

assume(r>0);

assume(k>0);

assume(w>0);

Hz := k*(z^2-2*r*a+r^2)/((z-1)*(z^2-2*b*z+1));

Hzw := eval(Hz, z = exp(i*w)); assume(a > 0);

Habs := simplify(abs(Hzw)^2);

p1 := eval(Habs, w = Pi) = (10^((-3.3018)*(1/20)))^2;

p2 := eval(Habs, w = (1/2)*Pi) = (10^((-.1758)*(1/20)))^2;

p3 := eval(Habs, w = (1/4)*Pi) = (10^(6.425*(1/20)))^2;

p4 := eval(Habs, w = (1/8)*Pi) = (10^(54.5699*(1/20)))^2;

solve({p1, p2, p3, p4})

 

Dear Maple experts,

 

I would like to visualize the equation -3*x+2*y+3*z=0  and (with other color) 2*y+3*z =0. I used the following commands:

with(Student[LinearAlgebra]):
infolevel[Student[LinearAlgebra]]:=1:
PlanePlot(-3*x+ 2*y + 3*z = 0, [x,y,z], normaloptions=[shape=harpoon], showbasis);

But I do not know how to show at the same time the second equation (2*y+3*z=0 ).

 

How should I proceed? Any hint?

Thanks for your attention,

 

Jean-Jaques

 

Hello! How can I find extremes of numeric solution of ODE system obtained using "dsolve"? Can I use something like "extrema" function?

Dear friends:

I have a long expression having a/some RootOf(something..) inside it. 

Any way to get just that "something..", i.e., the argument of RootOf() from that expression?

 

Thank you very much.

César Lozada

 

 

Hello,

this is the second time I'm writing.

I posted this question in June http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/201781-System-Of-Parametric-Equations.

This time I have  a similar problem because I'm trying to find a solution for a parametric system of equations but the number of equations and parameters is much bigger and using the tips you gave me last time I couldn't reach any result.

Here is the system:

1) alpha[1]=v*a*u*b ;
2) alpha[2]=v*a*u*(1-b);
3) alpha[3]= v*z*c*(1-a) ;
4) alpha[4]=v*z*(1-a)*(1-c) ;
5) alpha[11]=1/2*v*a* u* b* (-p*u*b+p*u*b*a+b*g-g);
6) alpha[22]=1/2*v*a*u*(1-b)* (p u b-p u b a-b g-p u+p u a);
7) alpha[33] =1/2*v*c*z*(1-a)* (c* (-z*p*a+q)-q);
8) alpha[44]=1/2*v*z*((1-a)*(1-c)* (c*z*p*a-z*p*a-q*c);
9) alpha[12]=v*a*u*b*(1- b)*(-p*u+p*u*a+g) ;
10) alpha[13]=v*a*u*b*z*c*p*(1-a) ;
11) alpha[14]=a*u*b*z*(1-a)*(1-c) ;
12) alpha[23]=a*u*z*c*(1-a)*(1-b);
13) alpha[24]=v*a*u*z*p*(1-a)*(1-b)*(1-c);
14) alpha[34]= v*c*z*(1-a)*(1-c)*(-z*p*a+q);

 

I have 14 equations/unknowns and 8 parameters (a, b, c, u, v, z, p, q).

I would like to write this system only in terms of alphas. In order to do so, I usually try to find the value for the parameters and the substitute them into the equations (and I have already found b,c,g,q using this technique) but I couldn't manage to find all of them. 

Howveer, as you suggested me, with Maple there is the command "eliminate" that implement exactly what I'm looking for but I can't make it work.

This is my code:

> sys := {alpha[1] = v*a*u*(1-b), alpha[2] = v*a*u*b, alpha[3] = v*z*c*(1-a), alpha[4] = v*z*(1-a)*(1-c), alpha[11] = (1/2)*v*a*u*(1-b)*(p*u*b-p*u*b*a-b*g-p*u+p*u*a), alpha[12] = v*a*u*b*(1-b)*(-p*u+p*u*a+g), alpha[13] =      z*c*a*u*(1-a)*(1-b), alpha[14] = v*z*a*u*p*(1-a)*(1-b)*(1-c), alpha[22] = (1/2)*v*a*u*b*(-p*u*b+p*u*b*a+b*g-g), alpha[23] = v*z*c*a*u*b*p*(1-a), alpha[24] = z*a*u*b*(1-a)*(1-c), alpha[33] = (1/2)*v*c*z*(1-a)*(c*(-z*p*a+q)-q), alpha[34] = v*c*z*(1-a)*(1-c)*(-z*p*a+q), alpha[44] = (1/2)*v*z*(1-a)*(1-c)*(c*z*p*a-z*p*a-q*c)};

> eliminate(sys, {a,b,c, p, q, u, v, z});

> simplify(%, size);

 

I also tries to substitute in the system the four parameters I already found but still I can't find a solution.

What am I doing wrong? Or the problem is that it is too complicated?

 

Thank you for your attention,

Elena

hello, I put in the code:

> with(plots), with(ColorTools), with(LinearAlgebra), with(RandomTools), with(ExcelTools);
> A := `<|>`(`<,>`(1, 2, 0, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4, 7, 9, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 3), `<,>`(0, 4, 7, 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6.5, 7, 5, 3, 2, 5, 9, 0, 1), `<,>`(1, 5, 2, 0, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4.3, 7, 8, 5, 3, 2, 9, 6, 4)); J := convert(Import("testB1.xlsx", "Cartesian", "E2:G18"), matrix);
Error, (in convert/matrix) expecting array, rtable or list
> B := matrix([[1], [.2], [.1], [.8], [.5], [.6], [.8], [.764], [.234], [0.4e-1], [.89], [.36], [.687], [.627], [.689], [.328], [.139]]); H := convert(Import("test.xlsx", "Cartesian", "D2:D18"), matrix);
Error, (in convert/matrix) expecting array, rtable or list
> C := [seq(Color([H[i, 1], 0, 0]), i = 1 .. RowDimension(A))];

 

And i get the error message everytime I try import m data list and I dont understand why. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you

 

Jennifer

I've been using a maple package (written by another author) on earlier versions of Maple.  Recently I have been trying to rewrite it so it's a bit more Maple 16+ friendly (since I've read that Maple is not forward-compatible). However, I have been experiencing similar strange behavior in both the original and my current version: 

After saving the module to my personal library, I load with(MyPackage). Most functions work fine (all but a handful out of dozens).  However, some functions won't be recognized (e.g., Coproduct(...) will return itself Coproduct(...)).  

HOWEVER, when I execute the code in the module in its own Maple worksheet, all functions are recognized and work perfectly.  I look at the difference in the code between the functions that work upon loading the package (using with(MyPackage) command in a separate sheet) and those that don't, and there is no difference.

I'm assuming I'll just have to cut and paste the hundreds of lines of code for my package into each sheet I'd like to use it in, since I haven't been able to find others experience this problem in the knowledge base.  I'm hoping someone will be able to help out, however.

Well, I'm having issues getting this expression to simplify.  I have a bunch of polynomial results I store in an array, and the simplify command isn't cancelling obvious terms which should cancel out.

June_18.mw

Curiously, it will simplify if I use the command by selecting it from the drop down menu when I select the expression (see lines (7) vs. (8))

I am writing a big numerical code in maple. I need to write the results in each step in a file. I mean in the first step of loop it writes the results in the first line of a text file, in the second step writes in the second line and to the end. when I use writedata command, it needs to write a complete array or matrix and it is not what i need. In  other words I want to save data for each steps of iteration during the calculation and when it goes to ther next step it writes the result in the next line.

Can you help me to perform it?

Thanks

Hey everyone,

New here but I'm a bit stuck. Ive looked around in list tools as well as tried but I havent had any luck.

Suppose I have a list defined as FirstList:=[A,B,C,D,E,F]. Now I want to create (and label) all possible
lists from FirstList which contain 4 elements which dont have an element repeated within the same list
In this example, there are 15 lists in total i.e.

Sublist[1]:=[A,B,C,D]:
Sublist[2]:=[A,B,C,E]:
Sublist[3]:=[A,B,C,F]:
Sublist[4]:=[A,C,D,E]:

..etc

Is there a simple way to do this???

Any help is appreciated!

Is there away to quickly execute a specific section within Maple? I know that I can execute a selection, but that sometimes requires me to select several lines of Maple code and can be tedious and tiresome.

Hello everybody,

I am trying to solve a partial differential equation (wave equation) with initial conditions that contain derivative and x-varying values

My equation
Uxx – Utt = 0 (hiperbólica) where xx and tt denote second partial derivatives with respect to x and t
0 <= x <= 10; t > 0;
u(0,t) = u(10,t) = 0;
Ut(x,0) = 0;
u(x,0)=
x for 0 <= x < 5
10-x for 5 <= x <= 10

I ve defined my equation as follow
> PDE := diff(u(x,t),x,x)=diff(u(x,t),t,t);

I m first trying without the x-varying initial condition.

> IBC := {u(0,t)=0,u(10,t)=0,u(x,0)=10-x,diff(u(x,0), t) = 0};
Returns the ugly

And that gives error when trying to solve
> pds := pdsolve(PDE,IBC,numeric);
Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/process_IBCs) initial/boundary condition does not contain the dependent variables of the PDE: 0 = 0

Another try with
> IBC := {u(0,t)=0,u(10,t)=0,u(x,0)=10-x,diff(u(x,t=0), t) = 0};

Looks like more promissing but returns (in a solving attempt)
> pds := pdsolve(PDE,IBC,numeric);
Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/process_IBCs) initial/boundary condition does not contain the dependent variables of the PDE: 0 = 0


Regarding the x varying initial condition, I ve tried the `assuming` keyword in various attempts but without success.

Anybody could help on the matter?


Thanks in advance for anytip.
Have a good day
Nicolas

Hallo,

Is there a fairly straightforward method for obtaining an array of coordinates from an implicit equation? I have an ellipse defined implicitly (by a horrendously involved expression) and can't figure out how to extract a set of coordinates from an implicitplot. I'm reluctant to use seq and fsolve with a fixed stepsize.

Would be grateful for some insight!

Thanks.

Weirp

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 36