There have come unwanted lines and marks . I donot know how to remove them. Using doc.block, remove block seems to be little tough to incorporate! Please enlighten me. Modified doc. is most welcome. Thanks. Ramakrishnan V 

Download GausianFinal15Nov2015.mwGausianFinal15Nov2015.mw

There are the complexes (C), quaternions (H or Q), octionions (O), sedenions (S) and the pathions (P). I have found the multiplication tables of them, although according to signs (+ or -) there differents at pathions. The important question is that How can I multiply two bases, i_n and i_m of higher dimensions, like in the routions or in the voudions?

Should I xor the indexes of the bases? Like this way: i_1 * i_2 = i_(1^2) = i_3

What is about the signs?

hello dear
how can i solve this three couplde pde?please help me

I want to solve an ODE from Game Theory, the Cournot competition.

It says

p(q1+r2(q1))+p'(q1+r2(q1))*r2(q1)-c2'(r2(q1))=0

 where, I think,

' means diff(,q1),

c2(q2)=c*q2 for a fixed c in [0,1]

and

p(q)=max(0,1-q).

So c2,p and r2 are functions.r2 goes from [0,inf) to [0,inf).

I look for r2, which should be r2(q1)=(1-q1-c)/2 when correctly solved.

However, the command dsolve says Error in dsolve (divison by 0).

 What is wrong? How do I obtain the solution for r2 in Maple?

How many numbers exist which are: less than 1000, multiple of 18 and also multiple of 10? Use Maple to find the answer 

Hello,

I tried to solve below equation, but it gives me zeros result. Please help me to find their inverse laplace. 

 It will be clearer if was pasted on Maple:

restart

Ps := [P[0], P[1], P[2], P[3], P[4]]:

eqs := [P[0](s) =~ (P[1](s)*mu[1]+P[2](s)*mu[2]+P[3](s)*mu[3]+P[4](s)*mu[4])/(s+lambda[1]+lambda[2]+lambda[3]+lambda[4]), P[1](s) = lambda[1]*P[0](s)/(s+mu[1]), P[2](s) = lambda[2]*P[0](s)/(s+mu[2]), P[3](s) = lambda[3]*P[0](s)/(s+mu[3]), P[4](s) = lambda[4]*P[0](s)/(s+mu[4])];

Ls := solve(eqs, Ps(s))[];

P(t)=~inttrans[invlaplace]~(rhs~(Ls), s, t);

Thank you

I have several *.mw files which I have built seperately. Now, for readability reasons, I would like to create a Master document, which will ues the first files, and then generate a PDF document.
I tried the read command, but it does not recognize the files.

Any help is appreciated.

Wonderful.mw

Hi all

I don't know what is its meaning???

The plot and the solved Zero-roots aren't coincident with each other...

Zero-roots: 7.532332868 Wheras from the plot we noticed that there's a root near 14...

And why this Code can't find other Zero-roots?

Thanks a lot

please I want a clear explanation for the command (contourplot) in the maple?

contourplot

Hi Mr Preben Alsholm .

i before asked you about a problem.now i have another question...

for determine unknown parameter oemega(or eigenvalue) according to line ''newsys2 := subs(omega^2 = omega2*10^5,newsys)'' and also line ''approxsoln = [omega2 = 1, f(x) = x^2*(1-x)^2]''

power (5) in term'' 10^5''  in  (omega2*10^5,newsys) and initial guess (1)  (omega2 = 1) are very effective on final result eigenvalues .sometimes gain different eigenvalues ,which it is not impossible recognize that

which one is correct and convege.however i need Positive

 eigenvalue that is minimum between them,If and only if , it converge after
some iteration in two section of maple file which is attached as
Eigenvalue.mw

  According to my code converge occuerd until  eigenvalue gained in first section (before line `11` := ((1+6*alpha2)*(1/12))*(int(fy11^2, x = 0 .. 1))...........) are equal with those obtain in second section .(please see below file for example for_example.mw)

it is necessary mention that between section 1 and 2 is relations.for example amont of first obtained eigenvalue which obtain from first section must be repleaced in line ''approxsoln = [omega2 = 0.661514014001420, h(theta) = theta^2*(1-theta)^2]...........''in second section,

and this procedure should be continued between section 1 and 2 until convergence with desired accuracy occurred.Another relate is that,the first ODE system  can be solved using the first set of boundary data to obtain first estimate for  second section (fy11). At the next step by repeating in the same manner, 

this time by obtained function (g) at the end of maple code (Solution of the second ODE system  with second set of boundary conditions leads to the first estimate of function g),that at this stage, the first iteration is completed.

Now by replacing omega2 which is determined in this section in to the first section ,fy11 is updated and gained Further.

Next, the updated function , by continuing the iterative procedure.

in matlab bvp4c rule is used for this purpose.is this impossible in maple software ?if not please help me for solve and gain correct omega..

thanks alot

When I right click on a plot and add a label name for the vertical axis, it is shown in horizontal way next to it, what should I do if I want to have it in a vertical display along the axis written upward?

Error, invalid piecewise

but

is OK.

can someone tell me how can I derive and solve d(g1(x))=0 a complicated function as

I tried with the instructions simplify and combine but without results.

Thanks in advance.

My goal is to plot the integral J with respect to t and as you can see J is a piecewise function.

This is my code.   hw2_numerical_2.mw

Actually it's a problem about adiabatic invariants.

If you want to know the backgroud please see this link.

www.mapleprimes.com/questions/206645-How-To--Numerically--Solve-It-

The title pretty much says it, but I wrote a bunch of code that operates on a matrix of given size. Now I want to increment that size with a loop, how can I put a loop around all the code? It won't let me just copy paste it into my loop body for some reason. Thanks!