ow to get plot for the exact solution of a piecewise function and i need the correct plot which has curve started at y-axis (0.5) and goes till 2?

Hello,
I am a beginner on Maple and I am working on approximate solutions of partial differential equations.
After finding the approximate solution I wanted to compare both the plots (The exact solution and the approximate one), is here any tool or command that allows me to do so ?

Thanks in Advance !

Can I link my MapleCloud application to the Application Center?

Several years ago I uploaded an installable workbook application for Clifford Algebra to the public maplecloud following the guidelines and formats set down in maple help. My intention was to make the application available in the application center, but I just noticed that a package uploaded to MapleCloud is not  available for searching in the Application Center. Unfortunately,the Maple Cloud site for public packages is a mess. One cannot readily browse the applications there like in the application center.

The submissions page for the application center is not helpful in this case. It seems to assume submissions will take the form of maple documents/ worksheets rather than applications written in a workbook). I could not navigate to the Maple Cloud to drop a link to my package using the submission form, but it should be possible to link the the package already installed on the MapleCloud to the Cloud? (Because I is easier to update the MapleCloud package and it can be installed by opening from the Cloud).

Applying Maple 2023's dsolve to the ODE shown below yields the solution y(t)=0 which is obviously incorrect.  Maple 2021 and earlier used to give a nonzero (albeit not very useful) answer.

Download dsolve-bug.mw

I have a problem. Maple wants to create and a palette, I can add content and icons to the palette, but as soon as I restart Maple, the palette content has disappeared and says that Maple cannot find the added icons.

I have used the method described in Maple Help.

Is there anyone who can help?

Kind regards

Dear sir ,

I have implemented Dsolve method the code was executed, but i need to apply Kellor Box method to solve the ODES 

Please can any one help how to implement? 

because there is no post regarding the Kellor box method. 

Download kellor_box_method.mw

Is there an equivalent to Pivot Table in Excel?
I'm working on some investing data, and am using Maple to gather information from various sources and using DataFrame to combine all the data. I could export the dataframe and open in Excel or other spreadsheet and use the Pivot table to summarize the data, but is there an easy way to do all of it in Maple?

Thanks

Good evening,could you please help me to find the values of Phi[2],Phi[3],Phi[4],....

The right hand side of the for loop is the equation i need.Is this maple code correct.

rps1.mw

I would like to get a (necessary and sufficient) condition on real parameters , , and  for which there exists (at least) one non-negative solution to . 
A convenient way to formulate this is using quantifiers. Unfortunately, if I run 

QuantifierElimination:-QuantifierEliminate(:-exists([x],:-And(x>=0,9*x^4+c<9*a*(x-1)+3*b*(x^2-1)+c*x^3)));

Maple will simply output 

As an alternative method, one can execute 

RealDomain:-solve([x >= 0, 9*x**4 + c < 9*a*(x - 1) + 3*b*(x**2 - 1) + c*x**3], 'parameters' = {a, b, c});
Warning,  computation interrupted

Regretfully, this time the computation is not done in several minutes (so one may have to abort it manually). 

So, what is the proper approach to the above problem in Maple (without any a priori knowledge, if possible)?

I have doubts as to whether this is possible, but I would like to ask anyway.

For example, can

`*`(`+`(a, b), c);
                           c (a + b)

be written with composed procedures (`*`@`+`) and somehow grouped arguments (a,b) for `+` and (a+b,c) for `*`.

So far I have only come across composed procedures in parethesis applied to one expression in parenthesis.

Since the second pair of parenthesis does a function application to everything what is inside the parenthesis it seems impossible that the right most procedure is only applied to a sub-term of the expression first.

If the answer to my question is no, I want to aks a related question:

Is it possible to separate procedures calls from arguments? So, in a first part of a statement I have a sequence (or a list or a composed function) of procedures/operators and in the second part a sequence of arguments instead of a nested construct of procedure calls?

I'm running Maple 2020 on a Mac with OS 14.3.1.  Maple is not seeing current files in folders, and when it saves files, it does so with an older date.  In Settings, Maple has permission to access the Desktop, Documents, and Downloads folders, the only options that my Mac provides.

It's a bit frustrating.  Any help would be appreciated.

I am presently working on bivariate functions defined this way

C := (u, v) -> (phi@@(-1))(phi(u)+phi(v));

phi is a function of specific expression named the "generator". Both u and v are assumed to be in the closed interval [0,1].

Here is an example:

restart
phi := u -> (u^(-theta)-1)/theta:
C := (u, v) -> (phi@@(-1))(phi(u)+phi(v)):
C(u, v)
                       / (-theta)        (-theta)    \
                      | u         - 1   v         - 1|
           @@(phi, -1)| ------------- + -------------|
                       \    theta           theta    /

This definition of C is correct providing that  theta in [-1, +infinity) \ {0}.
As you can see, the display of C(u, v) contains the inverse function phi@@(-1) which Maple doesn't seem to know what to do with.

What I would like is to get rid of  phi@@(-1) and get 

C(u, v);
        (-1+u^(-theta)+v^(-theta))^(-1/theta)

The only way I found to get this is to do that:

restart
phi := u -> (u^(-theta)-1)/theta:
(phi@@(-1)) := u -> solve(phi(x)=u, x): # explicit definition of (phi@@(-1))
C := (u, v) -> simplify((phi@@(-1))(phi(u)+phi(v))) assuming theta >= -1, theta <> 0:
C(u, v);
                                         /    1  \
                                         |- -----|
                                         \  theta/
             /      (-theta)    (-theta)\         
             \-1 + u         + v        /         

As you see I have been forced to tell Maple what the inverse function of phi was.
Is there another way do get this result without writting the bold red line?

Maple knows several inverse functions (trigonometric functions for instance), but how does it know that?
As Maple does not seem to use a (f@@(-1)) := u -> solve(f(x)=u, x) like definition, does it uses a correspondence table between functions and their inverse?
If it is so can we augment it?

Thanks in advance.

PS: the ultimate goal is to do something like this Download CAC.mw  for different generators.

For the moment I have defined my own table generator <--> inverse function  as I did above with the bold red line: this works but it is not very elegant.

Hi,
I have a problem and I haven't been able to solve it yet. I want to solve an ordinary diffrential equation similar to
                                                                                                   (dphi/dxi)^2+2*V(phi)=0
and plot phi versus xi for a the following conditions:
1) V(phi)=dphi/dxi=0 at (phi=0,phi_m) and
2) dV(phi)/dphi=0 at phi=phi_m and 
3) d^2V(phi)/dphi^2=0 at both phi=0 and phi=phi_m.
How can I do this by Maple?(see the attached file)
w1.mw

I tried

interface(warnlevel=0); infolevel[all]:=0;prinlevel:=0;kernelopts('printlevel'=0);

to suppress the warnings I get from this code

restart;
f:=z^3;
z_map:=proc(f,re,im) 
  if((re>0) and (im>0) and (im<1-re))then
    eval(f,z=re+I*im);
  else
    NULL;
  end if;
end proc;
p_re:=plots:-display(seq(plot([Re('z_map(f,re,im)'),Im('z_map(f,re,im)'),im=0..1]),re=0..10,0.1)):
p_im:=plots:-display(seq(plot([Re('z_map(f,re,im)'),Im('z_map(f,re,im)'),re=0..1]),im=0..10,0.1),color=green):
plots:-display(p_re,p_im,scaling=constrained)

The reason for the warnings is clear. The input lines are too long to be plotted. However, the resulting plot is exactly what I intended. Programatically truncating the lines would make the warning disappear, but it would make the code much more complicated.

What else can be done to suppress this kind of warning.

For Mathematica  math software app,there is a plugin to use in chatGPT pro ( paid subscription ) and maybe this can be done for Maple too ? 

Haven't used the plugin for Mathematica yet, am curious about it.
Let me have the AI look at the Riemann Hypothesis :)  
Have a few books on it, but can't get through that math with all those special functions.