If x -1 is regarded as the difference of two cubes, can Maple factor it?

Alla

I like the feature that permits the use of the dotted derivative, as it has the look and feel of the work that I am doing. However, when I enter, say, (x_dot + 1)^2 and invoke the expansion, I get x_dot(t)^2 +...

It's nice that Maple knows that x is a function of t, but I would like to avoid the clutter. How do I suppress the (t) so that all I see is x_dot^2?

I use Maple 11. Sometimes, the result become more then one when it run. Then the results are same. How to make it to give difference result?

Thanks.

 

The attached work sheet teaches you the fundamental concepts behind the antiderivative.

The examples in this worksheet are entirely done in an interactive video tutorial - follow the link below:

 (Ctrl+Click on the link to view the video)

Antiderivatives - Video Tutorial

 

Enjoy!

 

The attached worksheet is a wonderful introduction to the concept of obtaining the area under a curve.

You'll see how easy it is to learn how to find the limit of the sum of a series using Maple.

An interactive video tutorial that shows you how to do Riemann sums really fast is linked below:

(Ctrl+Click on the link to view the video)

Riemann Sums...

 i have a project from my univercity an d i want to ask you how can i put maple into flash document so can you help cause i must give my project one month again thanx before

Can Maple graph the Dirichlet function?

f(x) =   {0,   if x is rational
            {1,   if x is irrational

Alla

 

How can i avoid this error?

that happens 'cause I have 3 different solution for Vv:

> Vv3:=Re(solve(eq1,Vv)[3]);

 

The following program was created to determine a Hermite polynomial. Can anyone see where the error lies? Thanks!

 

restart; f:=x-> (x*(cos(x)))- ((x*x(sin(x/2))));
                 f := x -> x cos(x) - x x(sin(1/2 x))

                              fp := D(f)

 

I am trying to modify a solution to a non-homogeneous boundary value problem presented in Dr.

Hi everybody, one thing is not still clear to me about assume: for example  I have to find the solution of this simple equation:

e1 := q=ks*h^(5/3)*sqrt(If);

If i write solve(e1,h);   I get also all the complex solutions. I want just the real solution so i wrote:

assume(h::real);
solve(e1,h);

but I still have all the complex solutions. Why? I tried also  with assume(h::real,h>=0); but it's the same.

thanks
 

alberto

Yesterday I watched a demonstration of Maple being applied to the modeling and simulation of the internal deformations of human bones. The researcher was a mathematician working primarily in the biomedical modeling fields. The actual technique was to utilize the symbolic mathematical power of Maple to formulate the necessary equation pieces for a finite element model (FEM) of the internals of the bone. The equations are then fed into the legendary FEM solver ABAQUS.

Due to the notoriously non-linear qualities of human flesh and bone, traditional formulation methods developed for modeling beams and metals simply do not work. So as in the case of so many impressive engineering applications, the power of Maple is being deployed in the formulation or the pre-solution phase of modeling and in doing so, previously infeasible models now become feasible.

I need to input f(N,x)=summation{(-1)^(n+1)/n}sin(nx) N=1,3,5....infinity

Hello

i have a question regarding the Compiler:-Compile Command in Maple12
under linux i got this error message when trying to compile the example:
> y := proc( x :: float ) 2.3 * x end proc:
> cy := Compiler:-Compile( y):
Error, (in Compiler:-Compile) possible installation problem:
GNU C compiler (gcc) not found in your command search
path (PATH). You will need to restart Maple after ensuring that gcc
is installed and adjusting your PATH environment variable.
>
> cy( 1.1 );
cy(1.1)
but the compiler is installed in /usr/bin and maple knows the path:
> getenv(PATH);