Why maple is not plotting the whole surface in the domain specified?

Thanks for the help.

How do I construct the seuqence 1/16 , 1/32 , 1/64 , 1/128 , 1/256 in maple?

What's the syntax?

I looked at the examples in here:

http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/maple/view.aspx?path=seq

But didn't find something similar.

let γ be the root 

i have to apply taylor series on f(x) and then do some substitution like (helped by a member of Mapleprime)

restart;
taylor(f(x), x = gamma, 8);
f(x[n]) := subs([x-gamma = e[n], f(gamma) = 0, seq(((D@@k)(f))(gamma) = factorial(k)*c[k]*(D(f))(gamma), k = 1 .. 1000)], %)

then find the derivative of result from above output

i do

b := diff((x[n]), e[n])

basically i have to find the value of newton method which is

y_n=x_n-f(x_n)/D(f)(x_n)

here we substitute x_n=γ and D(f)(x_n)=b

and then want to apply f on y_n

there are to problem which i face 

1  f(x_n)/D(f)(x_n) is not in simplified form i-e O(e[n]^8) and O(e[n]^7) is appeared in numerator and denominator respectively. how we get the simplified result.

2 wht step should i do to find f(y_n)

plx help me to do this 

thanx in advance

When I use the option assume = nonnegint or integervariables = {...} in Optimization[Minimize], or Optimization[LPSolve] I've got the message "kernel connection lost'. 

Thie even happens when I use the simple example from the Maple help:

with(Optimization):
LPSolve(2*x+5*y,{3*x-y=1,x-y<=5},assume={nonnegative,integer});

It says; mserver.exe has stopped working. 

What's wrong? 

How can I compute F from G according to the following text? (I implemented this but I need a more efficient implementation.)

Given a set G of polynomials which are a subset of k[U, X] and a monomial order with U << X, we want to comput set F from G s.t.

1. F is subset of G and for any two distinct f1, f2 in F , neither lpp (f1) is a multiple of lpp (f2) nor lpp (f2) is a multiple of lpp (f1).

2. for every polynomial g in G, there is some polynomial f in F such that lpp (g) is a multiple of
lpp (f ), i.e. ⟨lpp (F )⟩ = ⟨lpp (G)⟩,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is worth nothing that F is not unique.

Example:  Let us consider G = {ax^2 − y, ay^2 − 1, ax − 1, (a + 1)x − y, (a + 1)y − a} ⊂ Q[a, x, y], with the lexicographic order on terms with a < y < x.

Then F = {ax − 1, (a + 1)y − a} and F ′ = {(a + 1)x − y, (a + 1)y − a} are both considered set.

please not that K[U,X] is a parametric polynomial ring (U is e sequence of parameters and X is a sequence of variables).

lpp(f) is leading monomial of f w.r.t. variables X. For example lpp(a*x^2+b*y)= x^2.

mydoubt-to-mapleprime.mw
an any one help me understand and correct the following errors in maple document. Thanks.

Download mydoubt-to-mapleprime.mw

Ramakrishnan V

rukmini_ramki@hotmail.com

Is there any Maple command for computing the product of two set A and B?

For example if A={a,b,c} and B={x,y} then we have A*B={ax,ay,bx,by,cx,cy}.

Hello,

I have two regimes. Each regime is characterized by system of state differential equations (diff(S(t), t), diff(K(t), t)) and co-state differential equations (diff(psi[S](t), t), diff(psi[Iota](t), t)) as follows: 

(1)

diff(S(t), t) = -eta*K(t)*S(t)/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))), diff(K(t), t) = eta*K(t)*S(t)/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t)))-upsilon

diff(psi[S](t), t) = eta*K(t)^2*(psi[S](t)-psi[Iota](t))/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))^2), diff(psi[Iota](t), t) = eta*S(t)^2*(psi[S](t)-psi[Iota](t))/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))^2)

(2)

diff(S(t), t) = -eta*K(t)*S(t)/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))), diff(K(t), t) = eta*K(t)*S(t)/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t)))

diff(psi[S](t), t) = eta*K(t)^2*(psi[S](t)-psi[Iota](t))/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))^2), diff(psi[Iota](t), t) = eta*S(t)^2*(psi[S](t)-psi[Iota](t))/(w*N*(S(t)+K(t))^2)

The first regime is employed from 0 to t1 (where t1 is unknown) and then regime 2, from t1 to T. I know the initial values for the state variables of the first system at t=0, that is, S(0)=S0 and K(0)=K0, as well as boundary conditions for the co-state variables for regime 2 at t=T, that is, psi_S(T)=a and psi_I(T)=b. 

I also know that my unknown t1 should satisfy the algebraic equation: -c - psi_S(t1)=0, where psi_S(t1) is the solution of the co-state diff equation of the regime 2 at t=t1. 

My question is: If I assume that the systems have not analytical solution, how can I found unknown t1 numerically? Moreover, asssume that all other parameters, such as T, eta, upsilon and others are given.

I’m using Maple 2015.2 to plot irregular spaced data using the surfplot command. The shape of the plot is as expected, however I’ve been unsuccessful in changing the color of the surface. I would like the surface to be a consistant color instead of the “rainbow” color scheme. I’ve tried both the color and colorscheme options to no avail.  I’m sure I’m making a very basic mistake, however I’m having difficulty finding it.

See attached worksheet

 feildstrength.mw

Best regards,

Ron

[EDIT]: Worksheet didn't attach the first time

why is simplify is making errors - me or maple?

Ec := (1/2)*Kc*(2*Pi*h0/Pi(a0^2+h0^2)-2*Pi*h/Pi(a^2+h^2))^2;
2
1 / 2 Pi h0 2 Pi h \
- Kc |------------- - -----------|
2 | / 2 2\ / 2 2\|
\Pi\a0 + h0 / Pi\a + h //
simplify(%);
2
2 Kc (-h0 + h)

Simplify is erasing the varibles a0 and a. Is there a secret to using simplify?

In Maple 2015.1 we have

restart;

solve([sin(2*x)/cos(x+3*Pi/2)=1,  x>-4*Pi, x<-5*Pi/2], x, allsolutions, explicit);

solve([sin(2*x)/cos(x+3*Pi/2)=1, x>0, x<2*Pi], x, allsolutions, explicit);

In the first example, the error message is not clear (actually there exists a unique root  x=-11*Pi/3), in the second example, one root  (x=5*Pi/3) is lost.

I've got this huge chunk of code which leads to an optimiazation at the very last line (Bestangles:=minimize(maximize()-minimize))). This minization is taking a very long time (havent solved it yet) and I would very much like to reduce that time. As I've understood maple does optimization by differentiating and then finding all extremes and comparing. Would this mean that since I minimize and optimize within a minimization command, it differentiates a ton of times? And if this is the case, can I somehow do the differentiation beforehand, since it is the same function being differentiate all the time? Or is there some other way I can improve the code? 
Thanks alot!

Heres the full code:

I am very beginner about Maple. How to get the general solution from the follwoing equations by Maple. Please help me. Its Urgent. Please help me out.

I am learning to use maple for my notes preparation for the subject Finite Element Analysis. It is interesting to know that how often we blame maple or computer for the silly mistakes we made in our commands and expect the exact answers. I have used a small file and find it easy to analyse my mistakes fatser. If we make a small mistake in a big file, it not only gives us problem finding our mistakes, it leads to more mistakes in other parts as well. A command working in one document need not necessarily work the same way in other document.

I have made my first document and people will come with suggestions to make appropriate modifications in the various sections to improve my knowledge on maple as well as the subject.

Download FINITE_ELEMENT_ANALYSIS.mw

Ramakrishnan V

rukmini_ramki@hotmail.com

why the the software can't plot the function like x^(4/3)*sin(1/x) or x^(1/3)

it could only plot where x>0,but the value is does exist where x<0.

Thanks in advance for your help.