What is the best (easiest) way to build up a small sytem (procedures) for calculating with base4-numbers ?

...  like multiplication, ln, square, root and so on.

I was thinking about padic or convert-procedures in maple, but before I will begin with that it would be very friendly to have a hint or the opinion of a professional maple programmer.

Thanks for helping 😃

Arno

I am trying to do the integration on the picture (int1). V,omega,theta,rhotræ,ix,iy,ixy,E,R are constants. a(r),å(r),FL(r),FD(r) are splines. It seems to run forever without any error. I have tried a simpler version to figure out if the problem has to do with the splines or the arctan. They can run independently but not when combined. (int2). I use an i7 6700k. I am fine with an aproximated answer within a couple %.  

I noticed PDEtools:-Solve hangs sometimes on some input where solve does not. When I change the solver for PDEtools:-Solve to use solve, it did not hang.

This means PDEtools:-Solve default solver is something else. I did not see what it is by looking at help.

Here is an example

restart;
eq:=[1/3*(-334*I*(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/3)-2*(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(2/3)+56978)/(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/3)*v[1]-20*I*2^(1/2)*v[2] = 0, (-18000*I*2^(1/2)+33400*I-40*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2)-40*(-167*I*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2)+75150*2^(1/2)+10*(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(2/3)+145445)/(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/3))/(167*I*(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/3)+(-4807763*I+27000*I*2^(1/2)+60*(1746675+72116445*2^(1/2))^(1/2))^(2/3)-28489)*v[2]-20*I*2^(1/2)*t = 0];

solve(eq,[v[1],v[2]]); #OK
PDEtools:-Solve(eq,[v[1],v[2]],solver=solve); #OK
PDEtools:-Solve(eq,[v[1],v[2]]); #hangs

Maple 2021

Hey guys I need help solving the following system of trigonometric equations

invEqs := [a[3]*cos(theta[1] + theta[2] + theta[3]) + a[2]*cos(theta[1] + theta[2]) + a[1]*cos(theta[1]) = px, a[3]*sin(theta[1] + theta[2] + theta[3]) + a[2]*sin(theta[1] + theta[2]) + a[1]*sin(theta[1]) = py, theta[1] + theta[2] + theta[3] = phi]

which everything except theta[1], theta[2], theta[3] are known.

here what I came up with but no success

res := solve(invEqs, {theta[2], theta[3], sin(theta[1])})

or better be like this but no output printed

res := solve(invEqs, {theta[1], theta[3], cos(theta[2])})

thanks in advance

How to find the power series solution of a nonlinear 4th order ordinary differential equation.

>ode:=U""+c^2*U"+k*c*U"-(3U^2+a)*U''=0

where U' denotes the differential w.r.t  z and a,k,c are constants. Please help to find.

hi! is there any kind of formula for coloring functions by HUE like this

contourplot(abs(sin(x) + y^2 + y + x*I), x = -6 .. 6, y = -5 .. 5, contours = [seq(1/2^n, n = 1 .. 3), seq(2^n, n = 1 .. 5)], numpoints = 200000, thickness = 1.5, color = black);

I wonder about situation when we don't have function for example f(z)=z but f(x,y)=x+I*y and we want to use domain coloring for that. Thanks in advance.

Hi!

How do I solve a equation ln in Maple:ln.mw

Let E be a random variable of expectation mu and A an algebraic expression containing no random variable.
If E has any known Maple distribution, then  Mean(A+E) = A+mu.

But if E is an "abstract" random variable, Mean doesn't seem capable to compute the expectation of A+E.
Notional example:

restart:
with(Statistics):
E := RandomVariable(Normal(mu, sigma)):
Mean(f(x)+E)
                           f(x) + mu
E := RandomVariable(Distribution(PDF = (z -> f(z)), Mean=mu)):
Mean(f(x)+E); 
     int((f(x) + _t) f(_t), _t = -infinity .. infinity)

IntegrationTools:-Expand(%);
        f(x) (int(f(_t), _t = -infinity .. infinity)) + (int(f(_t) _t, _t = -infinity .. infinity))

Questions:

• Why does Mean not behave as expected for an abstract random variable?
• Is there a simple way to obtain the expected result (Mean (A+E) = A+mu) (maybe by completing the definition of the distribution of E, or by any other means)?

TIA

PS: I know that I can replace Mean(A+E)  by A+Mean(E)  to obtain the desired result: this is not the type of answer I look for.

PS: I know (since Carl Love showed me how long ago) that I can define a "random variable" plus an operator Expectation such that Expectation(A+E)  by A+Expectation(E) ... but it's not a way I would call simple

Expectation := proc(e::algebraic)
     local a,b;
     if not hastype(e, RV) then e
     elif e::RV then 'procname'(e)
     elif e::`+` then map(thisproc, e)
     elif e::`*` then
          (a,b):= selectremove(hastype, e, RV);
          b*thisproc(a)
     else 'procname'(e)
     end if
end proc:

#------------------------------------------------------------------------

TypeTools:-AddType(
     RV, 
     {RandomVariable, 
     'RandomVariable^posint', 
     '`*`'({RandomVariable, 'RandomVariable^posint'})
     }
):
eval(Expectation(f(x)+E), Expectation=Mean)
                           f(x) + mu

Download mod_proc.mw

Hi 😊

I have found this Code here somewhere in MaplePrimes.

I am very interested in that Procedure, but it doesn't run.

I will be very happy, to get help with that.

Thanks a lot,

Arno

Hello

When doing chemistry in Maple, I want to be able to do my calculations with units.

Maple does not support the unit [M] (molar concentration), so I have to manually type the unit as [mol/L].

That is not a problem in itself, but I have encountered som issues with Maple's own formatting of the units.

For example, in the attached document I want the output unit to be (mol/L)^(-2). However, Maple automatically formats it as

It even does the same thing in the "Maple Math" here on MaplePrimes - Here I try to type (mol/L)^(-2):

So does anyone know a way to avoid Maple's auto-formatting of the output, or is there a way to customize it so I get my desired output?

I have attached the document with some screenshots in it: chemistry_units.mw

// Frederik

primes.mw

As a result of a calculation I have a long expression. I give it a name, say, X,

X:= long expression. 

I try to use typematch to extract different parts of X and its does not work (it returns false).  

If, however, I copy and paste the long expression from the output and plug into my typematch query it works!   

It seems that copy and paste change the type of the expression. I am very confused with this. 

I have uploaded a file with the problem at the beggining.  Thank you! 
Max 
 

Hey guys, how can I apply multiplication to a sequence of matrices like A[1], A[2]...A[n] so it becomes A[1]*A[2]...*A[n] ? thanks in advance

I am investigating the history of scales and temperament in western music. I would like to be able to play a tone of a given frequency in Maple, and then a sequence of tones to make a scale, and then a collection of tones to make a chord. I found the Play command  in the online help screen for Audio Tools, but can't make it work. I don't get an error message, but neither do I get a sound. 

Hi,

exploring this package for a graduate course (to physicists, actually).

When calculating diatomic potential energy curves for Ar-F (using Parametric2RDM, or CC) I am running into trouble,

a discontinuity appears at about R=3 Angstroms.

This happens for many wavefunction sets (cc-pVXZ with X=D,T,Q,5, also augmented set on F)

The problem might be basis set superposition error (BSSE), treated usually by counterpoise, i.e., doing the monomer calculations with the molecular basis, by putting in ghost basis for the other atom at the given distance R.

I couldn't figure out whether, in fact, the package supports some treatment at this level, and/or if it does, how to implement it.

many thanks

marko

I am merging two separate modules  B,C to be child modules inside one main A module.

Now, I found the code breaks, because uses does not work any more.

Before merging, C module did uses B. But now this gives an error when both B,C sit inside one parent module.  An example make this easier to explain

restart;
interface(warnlevel=4);
kernelopts('assertlevel'=2):

A:=module()

   export B:=module()
     export foo:=proc()
         print("In B:-foo()");
     end proc;
   end module;

   export C:=module()
      uses B; #this cases problem
      export boo:=proc()
           foo();
      end proc;
   end module;
end module;

Error, (in A:-C) no bindings were specified or implied

Changing uses B; to uses A:-B; does not help. I get error Error, (in A:-C) `A` does not evaluate to a module

I also tried uses :-A:-B; , now this does not give error, but it does not work. i.e. when doing  A:-C:-boo() Maple does not end up calling foo() inside module B as expected.

One way to avoid all this, is not to use uses B inside the module C and do this instead

A:=module()

   export B:=module()
     export foo:=proc()
         print("In B:-foo()");
     end proc;
   end module;

   export C:=module()      
      export boo:=proc()
           B:-foo(); 
      end proc;
   end module;
end module;

But it means I have to now change lots of code inside the C module, and add an explicit B:- everywhere

This is how it was before the merging

B:=module()
   export foo:=proc()
       print("In B:-foo()");
   end proc;
end module;

C:=module()  
  uses B;    #no problem now
  export boo:=proc()
      foo();  #this now uses B:-foo() automatically due to uses.
  end proc;
end module;

The above works. Now I can do C:-boo() and it works as expected.

The question is: How to make it work after moving both C and B inside one parent module so I do not have to change lots of code? I tried many things, but can't get it to work.

Maple 2021 on windows 10

Edit

Thanks for the answers below. I think I have to change my code then either way to add a prefix to the call. I actually always use the long form of the call for everything as in module:-function() but for one function, which I use so much everywhere, using the fully qualified name would make things hard to read.  This function converts Maple expressions to Latex after some filtering. Here is an example

cat(",toX(y),"' = f_0(",toX(f),")",toX(y),"+f_1(",toX(x),")",toX(g),"^n \\tag{2}, etc.....")

Now the function toX comes from one module, the one I had uses for it. Now I have to change the above to becomes

",module_name:-toX(f),"' = f_0(",module_name:-toX(x),")",module_name:-toX(y),"+f_1(",module_name:-toX(x),")",module_name:-toX(g),"^n \\tag{2}

Since my strings are very long as it is, (program generates Latex on the fly as it runs), this will make them even longer and harder to read.

But I can change all this in the editor, using global search and replace.

I was just hoping I do not have to just because I moved the modules all into one main module. I still do not understand why Maple does not allow uses when moving the modules inside one bigger module, but I guess this is by design.