MaplePrimes Questions

Below is the plot like I want it. The basic plot has been done with a simple plot command.

>plot(0, x = 0 .. 10, y = 0 .. 4, gridlines = true)

But the label of each axis was done manually. But I have tried to do it inside the plot command. A little help would be very appreciated.

So here is what I want the plot to look like:

Thank you in advance for the help.

Mario

Hi everyone,

Do you know if there are some known codes for plotting pseudospectra of squared (and finite) matrices with given spectrum ? 
Thanks in advance

Best,

Rachid

What will be the range of p and q to get the plot and to get the optimum solution?
If possible get a solution for particular value of p and q.
file attached: q1.mw

Hi all, any one help  me to find the values of constants by using given condition and then how to varify that the goiven condition varify the expression. I have found manually but want to varify through maple.

help.mw

I have a list:
mylist := [x^4 + (-4*m - 7)*x^3 + (m + 4)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, x^4 + (-4*m - 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (5*m - 7)*x, x^4 + (-4*m - 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (7*m - 5)*x, x^4 + (-4*m - 7)*x^3 + (2*m + 5)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, x^4 + (-4*m - 7)*x^3 + (3*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 10)*x, x^4 + (-4*m - 5)*x^3 + (2*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 9)*x]

I use

L := map~(normal, mylist);

and get. 

L := [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 4)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (5*m - 7)*x, x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (7*m - 5)*x, x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (2*m + 5)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (3*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 10)*x, x^4 - (4*m + 5)*x^3 + (2*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 9)*x].

I use seq to list L[i] and diff(L[i])

[seq([L[i], diff(L[i], x)], i = 1 .. nops(L))];

and get

[[x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 4)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(m + 4)*x + 3*m - 5], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (5*m - 7)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(m + 5)*x + 5*m - 7], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (7*m - 5)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(m + 5)*x + 7*m - 5], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (2*m + 5)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(2*m + 5)*x + 3*m - 5], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (3*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 10)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(3*m + 1)*x + 7*m - 10], [x^4 - (4*m + 5)*x^3 + (2*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 9)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 5)*x^2 + 2*(2*m + 1)*x + 7*m - 9]]

How can I insert L'(2), L''(2) and solve the systems L'(2) = 0 and L''(2) > 0 to get the solutions m?
like this
[seq([L[i], diff(L[i], x), solve([L'(2) = 0,L''(2)>0],m) ], i = 1 .. nops(L))]

I also tried
[seq([L[i], diff(L[i], x), eval(diff(L[i], x), x = 2), solve([eval(diff(L[i], x), x = 2) = 0], m)], i = 1 .. nops(L))]

to obtain 
[[x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 4)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(m + 4)*x + 3*m - 5, -41 - 41*m, {m = -1}], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (5*m - 7)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(m + 5)*x + 5*m - 7, -39 - 39*m, {m = -1}], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (m + 5)*x^2 + (7*m - 5)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(m + 5)*x + 7*m - 5, -37 - 37*m, {m = -1}], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (2*m + 5)*x^2 + (3*m - 5)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(2*m + 5)*x + 3*m - 5, -37 - 37*m, {m = -1}], [x^4 - (4*m + 7)*x^3 + (3*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 10)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 7)*x^2 + 2*(3*m + 1)*x + 7*m - 10, -58 - 29*m, {m = -2}], [x^4 - (4*m + 5)*x^3 + (2*m + 1)*x^2 + (7*m - 9)*x, 4*x^3 - 3*(4*m + 5)*x^2 + 2*(2*m + 1)*x + 7*m - 9, -33 - 33*m, {m = -1}]]

I need to extract the list of all powers present in multivariable polynomial. For example, for x+y+x^2y^2+y^d I want to get the list [(1,0),(0,1),(2,2),(0,d)]. How to perform this?

Hello Everyone;

I need help to solve the following system using rk-4 method

restart;
NULL;
NULL;
C := 1.0;
gK := 36.0;
gNa := 120.0;
gL := 0.3;
VK := -77.0;
VNa := 50.0;
VL := -54.0;
III := 20;
alpha_n := 0.01*(v(t) + 55.0)/(1 - exp(-1.0/10.0*v(t) - 11.0/2.0));
beta_n := 0.125*exp((-v(t))/80.0 + (-1)*13.0/16.0);
alpha_m := 0.1*(v(t) + 40.0)/(1 - exp(-1.0/10.0*v(t) - 4.0));
beta_m := 4.0*exp(-1.0/18.0*v(t) - 65.0/18.0);
alpha_h := 0.07*exp((-1)*(v(t) + 65.0)/20.0);
beta_h := 1/(1.0 + exp((-v(t) + 35.0)/10.0));

dsys1 := {diff(h(t), t) = alpha_h*(1 - h(t)) - beta_h*h(t), diff(m(t), t) = alpha_m*(1 - m(t)) - beta_m*m(t), diff(n(t), t) = alpha_n*(1 - n(t)) - beta_n(t), diff(v(t), t) = III - gK*n(t)^4*(v(t) - VK) - gNa*m(t)^3*h(t)*(v(t) - VNa) - gL*(v(t) - VL), h(0) = 0.9996937394, m(0) = 0.02890553447, n(0) = 0.2445865495, v(0) = -70};

HPM.mw

  • Please help me
  • How do I write Homotopy Perturbation method for a partial differential equation for this question in Maple?

Download HPM.mw

 

modifed_practice.mw

Impact of Shape-Dependent Hybrid Nanofluid on Transient Efficiency of a Fully W
et Porous Longitudinal Fin

dear sir please help me to solve the graph i given reference pdf also. i have implimented the code but getting error in ploting 

Thank you

Using the SingularValues command with any output type specified causes this error

Error, (in sanity) invalid input: LinearAlgebra:-SingularValues expects value for keyword parameter output to be of type {list(identical(U,S,Vt,list)), identical(U,S,Vt,list)}, but received [U, S, Vt]

Below is a minimal example to trigger the error. Is there something wrong about how I am calling the function?

restart:
with(LinearAlgebra):

sanity := proc()
  local A,U,S,Vt;
  A :=RandomMatrix(3,10);
  U,S,Vt := SingularValues(A, output=['U','S','Vt']);
end proc:

sanity();

Dear Maple experts,

I have a system of several nonlinear equaitons. My code can solve it for a given parameter. But when I want to plot it, it takes too much time with no results. So, I decided to plot it for several given points. I get the answer for the points individually, but I don't know how to apply this to 'plot' command. Would you please help?

restartNULL

with(plots); with(RealDomain)

NULL

c := 1; cr := 0.3e-1*c; u := 5; sExp := 0.6e-1*c; s := .65*c; v := 3*c

NULL

NULL

FirmModelPartial1 := proc (alpha, beta, delta) local L1s, qs, ps, prs, hs, `&kappa;s`, `&lambda;__1s`, `&lambda;__2s`, `&lambda;__3s`, q, p, pr, h, kappa, `&lambda;__1`, `&lambda;__2`, `&lambda;__3`, FirmpfSiS, RecpfSiS, UnsoldSiS, EnvironSiS, p0, OldSoldPrim, xi, prof1, prof2, L1, L2, E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E12; prof1 := (ps-c)*qs+((1/2)*beta^2*`&kappa;s`^2/(u*(1-alpha))-(1/2)*(qs+beta*`&kappa;s`)^2/u)*(ps-s)+hs*prs*(beta*`&kappa;s`-(1/2)*beta^2*`&kappa;s`^2/(u*(1-alpha))); L1s := prof1+`&lambda;__1s`*(1-sExp/prs-hs)+`&lambda;__2s`*(qs-`&kappa;s`)+`&lambda;__3s`*(qs-alpha*beta*`&kappa;s`/(1-alpha)); E1 := qs*(diff(L1s, qs)) = 0; E2 := hs*(diff(L1s, hs)) = 0; E3 := `&lambda;__1s`*(1-sExp/prs-hs) = 0; E4 := `&lambda;__2s`*(qs-`&kappa;s`) = 0; E5 := `&lambda;__3s`*(qs-alpha*beta*`&kappa;s`/(1-alpha)) = 0; E6 := qs = alpha*u*(v-ps)/(v-s); E7 := prs = ps-delta*v; E8 := `&kappa;s` = (beta*prs*(1-hs)+sExp*(1-beta))/(beta^2*(prs*(1-hs)-sExp)/(u*(1-alpha))+2*cr); p, q, pr, h, kappa, `&lambda;__1`, `&lambda;__2`, `&lambda;__3` := (eval([ps, qs, prs, hs, `&kappa;s`, `&lambda;__1s`, `&lambda;__2s`, `&lambda;__3s`], solve({0 <= qs-alpha*beta*`&kappa;s`/(1-alpha), 0 <= qs-`&kappa;s`, 0 <= 1-sExp/prs-hs, 0 <= `&lambda;__1s`, 0 <= `&lambda;__2s`, 0 <= `&lambda;__3s`, diff(L1s, qs) <= 0, diff(L1s, hs) <= 0, c < ps, (1/2)*beta*`&kappa;s`/(u*(1-alpha)) < 1, sExp+delta*v < ps, E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8}, [ps, qs, prs, hs, `&kappa;s`, `&lambda;__1s`, `&lambda;__2s`, `&lambda;__3s`])[1]))[]; xi := kappa/q; FirmpfSiS := max(0, eval(prof1, [ps = p, qs = q, prs = p-delta*v, hs = h, `&kappa;s` = kappa])); RecpfSiS := ((1-h)*pr-sExp)*(beta*kappa-(1/2)*beta^2*kappa^2/(u*(1-alpha)))+(sExp-cr)*kappa; UnsoldSiS := (1/2)*(q+beta*kappa)^2/u-(1/2)*beta^2*kappa^2/(u*(1-alpha)); EnvironSiS := q+UnsoldSiS; return p, q, FirmpfSiS, RecpfSiS, EnvironSiS, h, UnsoldSiS, h, xi end proc

NULL

NULL

FirmModelPartial1(.1, .2, .1)[3]

Error, (in FirmModelPartial1) invalid subscript selector

 

NULL

FirmModelPartial1(.2, .2, .1)[3]

Error, (in FirmModelPartial1) invalid subscript selector

 

FirmModelPartial1(.3, .2, .1)[3]

.2200894743

(1)

NULL

FirmModelPartial1(.4, .2, .1)[3]

.2892440018

(2)

FirmModelPartial1(.5, .2, .1)[3]

.3801240291

(3)

FirmModelPartial1(.6, .2, .1)[3]

.4921660779

(4)

FirmModelPartial1(.7, .2, .1)[3]

.6227094789

(5)

FirmModelPartial1(.8, .2, .1)[3]

.7668402612

(6)

FirmModelPartial1(.9, .2, .1)[3]

.9161921261

(7)
 

plot('FirmModelPartial1(alpha, .2, .2)[3]', alpha = .1 .. .90, adaptive = false, sample = [.1, .2, .3, .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, .9])

 

Download Reza_Tchno_(v3).mw

Besdies, it seems for some points there is no feasible solution. So, there is no need to have plot for them.

I attach the code. Thank you so much!

dS/dt=qnv-alpha_1*S*H-mu_sh*S

dH/dt=lamda_h-alpha_1*S*H-mu_h*H

dI/dt=alpha_1*S*H-beta_1*I-mu_i*I

dS/dt=beta_1*I-delta_1*S-mu_s*S

DATA:

q=0.75; n=15;v=20; alpha_You1=0.001; S=2000; H=3000; mu_sh=0.000000000012; lambda=3000;mu_h=0.94; beta_1=0.125; I=0; mi_i=0.95; delta_1=0.0975; S=0; mu_s=0.029

Good day all,

please I am new Maple user, i used the same code to solve boundary layer flow. Itried to use the same code in solving nanofluid but the solution is not coverging at some point. But the author i want to compared my results with had solution at those points.

Is there any way i can get solution of this model at this with these values?. Please i need your help. Thank you in advance

secod_code.mw

NULL

restart

with*plots; ode1 := (1+1/bet)*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta))-(diff(f(eta), eta))^2+f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))+Gr*(theta(eta)+lambda1*theta(eta)^2)+Gc*(phi(eta)+lambda2*phi(eta)^2)-M*(diff(f(eta), eta)) = 0

(1+1/bet)*(diff(diff(diff(f(eta), eta), eta), eta))-(diff(f(eta), eta))^2+f(eta)*(diff(diff(f(eta), eta), eta))+Gr*(theta(eta)+lambda1*theta(eta)^2)+Gc*(phi(eta)+lambda2*phi(eta)^2)-M*(diff(f(eta), eta)) = 0

(1)

ode2 := (diff(theta(eta), eta, eta))*(1+(4*R*(1/3))*(theta(eta)+CT)^3)/Pr+4*R*(theta(eta)+CT)^2*(diff(theta(eta), eta))^2+f(eta)*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+Nb*(diff(phi(eta), eta))*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+Nt*(diff(theta(eta), eta))^2-de*(f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta))*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+f(eta)^2*(diff(theta(eta), eta, eta))) = 0

(diff(diff(theta(eta), eta), eta))*(1+(4/3)*R*(theta(eta)+CT)^3)/Pr+4*R*(theta(eta)+CT)^2*(diff(theta(eta), eta))^2+f(eta)*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+Nb*(diff(phi(eta), eta))*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+Nt*(diff(theta(eta), eta))^2-de*(f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta))*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+f(eta)^2*(diff(diff(theta(eta), eta), eta))) = 0

(2)

ode3 := diff(phi(eta), eta, eta)+Pr*Le*(diff(phi(eta), eta))*f(eta)+Nt*(diff(theta(eta), eta, eta))/Nb-Pr*Le*dc*(f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta))*(diff(phi(eta), eta))+f(eta)^2*(diff(phi(eta), eta, eta))) = 0

diff(diff(phi(eta), eta), eta)+Pr*Le*(diff(phi(eta), eta))*f(eta)+Nt*(diff(diff(theta(eta), eta), eta))/Nb-Pr*Le*dc*(f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta))*(diff(phi(eta), eta))+f(eta)^2*(diff(diff(phi(eta), eta), eta))) = 0

(3)

bcs1 := f(0) = 0, (D(f))(0) = 1+xi*((D^2)(f))(0), (D(f))(6) = 0, theta(6) = 0, phi(0) = 1+`&varsigma;`*(D(phi))(0), theta(0) = 1+Zeta*(D(theta))(0), phi(6) = 0

f(0) = 0, (D(f))(0) = 1+xi*(D(f))(0)^2, (D(f))(6) = 0, theta(6) = 0, phi(0) = 1+varsigma*(D(phi))(0), theta(0) = 1+Zeta*(D(theta))(0), phi(6) = 0

(4)

NULL

 

L := [0., .1, .4, 1]

[0., .1, .4, 1]

(5)

 
  

NULL


  for k to 10 do
      sol_All := dsolve
                 ( eval
                   ( {bcs1, ode1, ode2,ode3},
                     [xi= L[k],R=1, CT=0.2, Gr=0.5, Gc=0.5, lambda1=0.2, lambda2=0.2, Pr=0.72, Nb=0.5,  Le=1, dc=0.2, de=0.2, Nt=0.5, Zeta=0.5, varsigma=0.5, M=1.5, bet=1.5]
                   ),
                   [f(eta), theta(eta),phi(eta)],
                   numeric,
                   output = listprocedure
                 );
      Y_sol || k := rhs(sol_All[5]);
      YP_sol || k := -rhs(sol_All[6]);

feta || k := rhs(sol_All[4]);
      fpeta || k := rhs(sol_All[3]);

phieta || k := rhs(sol_All[8]);
      phipeta || k := rhs(sol_All[7])
  end do:

Error, (in dsolve/numeric/bvp) initial Newton iteration is not converging

 

for k to 10 do L[k], [(Y_sol || k)(0), (YP_sol || k)(0)] end do

0., [Y_sol1(0), YP_sol1(0)]

 

.1, [Y_sol2(0), YP_sol2(0)]

 

.4, [Y_sol3(0), YP_sol3(0)]

 

1, [Y_sol4(0), YP_sol4(0)]

 

Error, invalid subscript selector

 

for k to 10 do L[k], [(feta || k)(0)] end do

0., [feta1(0)]

 

.1, [feta2(0)]

 

.4, [feta3(0)]

 

1, [feta4(0)]

 

Error, invalid subscript selector

 

NULL

Error, mismatched or missing bracket/operator

"for k  from 1 to  10 do L[k], ([phieta ||k(0),phipeta||k(0)]); od; "

 

NULL

  plot( [ seq((Y_sol||j)(eta), j = 1..6)],
         eta = 0 .. 6,
         labels = [eta, theta(eta)],
         axes = boxed
      );
plot( [ seq((YP_sol||j)(eta), j = 1..6)],
         eta = 0 .. 8,
         labels = [eta, thetaprime(eta)],
         axes = boxed
      );

 plot( [ seq((feta||j)(eta), j = 1..6)],
         eta = 0 .. 8,
         labels = [eta, f(eta)],
         axes = boxed
      );
  plot( [ seq((fpeta||j)(eta), j = 1..6)],
         eta = 0 .. 5,
         labels = [eta, fprime(eta)],
         axes = boxed
      );
plot( [ seq((phipeta||j)(eta), j = 1..6)],
         eta = 0 .. 5,
         labels = [eta, phiprime(eta)],
         axes = boxed
      );

plot( [ seq((phieta||j)(eta), j = 1..6)],
         eta = 0 .. 5,
         labels = [eta, phi(eta)],
         axes = boxed
      );

Warning, expecting only range variable eta in expression Y_sol1(eta) to be plotted but found name Y_sol1

 

 

Warning, expecting only range variable eta in expression YP_sol1(eta) to be plotted but found name YP_sol1

 

 

Warning, expecting only range variable eta in expression feta1(eta) to be plotted but found name feta1

 

 

Warning, expecting only range variable eta in expression fpeta1(eta) to be plotted but found name fpeta1

 

 

Warning, expecting only range variable eta in expression phipeta1(eta) to be plotted but found name phipeta1

 

 

Warning, expecting only range variable eta in expression phieta1(eta) to be plotted but found name phieta1

 

 

Sometimes the canvas in the 2d-workspace of a subsystem (or component) is grayed out and the parameters in the parameter pane cannot be changed.

Example from the Model Gallery where the mass cannot be changed

Another example of a CAD geometry where I would like to change color and transparency:  seeshell.msim

How to unprotect the parameters?

I have observed that copy and pasting (Edit2: in a new document) and deleting the original component and copy/paste back into the original document and reconnection of the pasted  component works. Are there shorter ways to unprotect? 

And: How to do the reverse action (i.e. protecting a component)?

(I could not find a "when" and "why" for the protection in the documentation. Maybe I overlooked something)

Edit:

Other reasons why to unprotect are suppressions of components and highlight of multibody ports and axes.

Adding or reformating automatically generated ports (Edit3).


 

Hello Everyone;

Can anybody help me to solve the analytical solution of the following ODE?
AAS := C*diff(y(t), t) + (-B0*y(t)^3 - B1*y(t)^2 - B2*y(t) - B3);y[0] := 1

C,B0,B1,B2 are constants.

First 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 Last Page 173 of 2427