Dear Carl Love (@Carl Love )

Thank you for your reply.

As said in my previous reply to ThU, I know that laplace is not a way for solving the diff-eq.

But anyway I did not know that there was such a wonderful command... showstat is very useful.

I will make use of it in future.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear Carl Love (@Carl Love )

Thank you for your reply.

As said in my previous reply to ThU, I know that laplace is not a way for solving the diff-eq.

But anyway I did not know that there was such a wonderful command... showstat is very useful.

I will make use of it in future.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear ThU (@ThU ),

Thank you for your reply.

I will use that way. That will help what I want to do for sure.

I know that the equation is not simple (the term simple means approximation of sin(phi(t)) = phi(t) has done).

What I want is the transfer function of f__tension(t) over phi(t) and I am pretty sure I will never get it because the simpledeq is not linear nor polynomial.

I am pretty stuck anyway.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear ThU (@ThU ),

Thank you for your reply.

I will use that way. That will help what I want to do for sure.

I know that the equation is not simple (the term simple means approximation of sin(phi(t)) = phi(t) has done).

What I want is the transfer function of f__tension(t) over phi(t) and I am pretty sure I will never get it because the simpledeq is not linear nor polynomial.

I am pretty stuck anyway.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

@Axel Vogt 

Dear Axel Vogt,

Thank you for your reply.

So I have to do "evalf" thingy everytime I use rational numbers and Pi's...

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

@Axel Vogt 

Dear Axel Vogt,

Thank you for your reply.

So I have to do "evalf" thingy everytime I use rational numbers and Pi's...

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

@Thomas Richard 

Dear Thomas Richard,

Thank you for your reply.

I sent the worksheet to the support in Japan.

I want this bug to be fixed as soon as possible if this is really a bug.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

@Thomas Richard 

Dear Thomas Richard,

Thank you for your reply.

I sent the worksheet to the support in Japan.

I want this bug to be fixed as soon as possible if this is really a bug.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear Carl Love,

Thank you for your quick reply.

Below is the attachment.

20130826_tensioner_s.mw

I usually do not get the annoying decimal point but this time I do.

Weird...

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear Carl Love,

Thank you for your quick reply.

Below is the attachment.

20130826_tensioner_s.mw

I usually do not get the annoying decimal point but this time I do.

Weird...

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear Alejandro Jakubi,

Thank you for your quick reply.

Now I understood why that happened.

I want that bug to be fixed ASAP...

Thanks anyway!!

Dear Alejandro Jakubi,

Thank you for your quick reply.

Now I understood why that happened.

I want that bug to be fixed ASAP...

Thanks anyway!!

I sent e-mail to support and understood this was caused by lack of memory.

I need better machine :(

Thanks anyway.

Dear Support,

Thanks for your reply.

Yes, I did try to export to a different location and I could not.

Other results which were obtained by simulations with solver type variable could be exported.

I will e-mail to the support anyway.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi

Dear Support,

Thanks for your reply.

Yes, I did try to export to a different location and I could not.

Other results which were obtained by simulations with solver type variable could be exported.

I will e-mail to the support anyway.

Best regards,

Yukihiro Hatagishi