i saw a lot of design and i try to construct them somehow, but i want guidance which is true or not true and what is the best design for construct the table and figure 

in must design i saw i like this but i cound't construct same table

the important part is this which define a good design for table and 2D plot and 3D plot 
something like that

G1.mw

T2.mw

i got some issue regarding to solving numerical example, he got combine function of infinite term i don't know how when he give alpha a number ? and when didn't give number  to order of fractional laplace and stay alpha letter he got outcome i want apply laplace while is for general alpha betwen n-1<alpha<n when n is number of initial condition, i want to get same result as he did steps are not wrong but outcome have problem .

i have same problem in three example in one paper, is related to update maple to 2025, i saw talking about calculating inverse laplace at new version  any one  know how fix this?

Ex1.mw

EX2.mw

Ex3.mw

When I load LinearAlgebra and give the command

{Matrix([1])} union {Matrix([1])};

I receive a set with two elements, each equal to the matrix [1]. Why does this happen? How can I eliminate this duplicate element?

I get this ->

But would like this ->

First impressions, I have mixed feelings - one being it's cool and new, the other feeling that it's a bit clunky.

In my opinion Maple is starting to look like the interface is being modelled after Microsoft Office, or like the ribbon toolbars of AutoCad or Inventor.  Maple's "uniqueness" is disappearing.  I rather liked the old interface. 

The toolbar icons are larger, taking up more space.

The toolbar layout is indeed simpler, but also less efficient maybe.  I mean there were more useful available icons at once before, more functional is the word I guess.  Now it might be a couple of clicks away to pull up your favorite icon(s).  The icons all look very nice, that's a plus but they could be smaller.  

Perhaps we could make a customized menu toolbar?  That is, allow users to put all the most useful icons we use or would like the most to be displayed?  This would help some of the strange organization of some of the icons and allow us to make our maple "sandbox" feel more at home. 

Where have all the tools options display / interface / Precision tabs all gone?  That is typsetting (extended or Maple standard) options
plot or font anti-aliasing (Enabled Disabled) options
plot dislpay (inline window) options
Precision (limit expression length to etc...)

What is the installation time for Maple 2025?

I looked up the installation times for Matlab and Mathematica.  The AI assistant in google says Matlab takes several minutes to an hour, for Mathematica 20 minutes to an hour, for Maple it said around 15 minutes -  Is that about right? 

in thus example all of them are write in shape of matrix but all of them are linear differential equation which have critical point zero ,i want to plot thus example and decided the kind of critical point by eagenvalue and by eagenvector i can find the trajectory how i can plot by matrix of each example and show that that critical point is which type as mention in picture?

system-phase-examples.mw

in my iteration is appear Error, (in assuming) when calling 'evala/preproc4'. Received: 'floats not handled' which i know is  becuase assuming but how fix it?

and how i can get that table ?

error-problem.mw

my iteration u[i] in last step not working as i want where is the issue?

b1.mw

i want plot like that but i can't  and there is anyway for finding the equalibriom point of system? 

Download Plot-1.mw

Dear All, I hope this message finds you well. I am currently facing some issues and would appreciate your support or guidance in resolving them. Nusselt_RSM_Model.mw

Download Nusselt_RSM_Model.mw

Hi,

I’m not very familiar with how to handle complex numbers in Maple, but I’d like to solve a final exam exercise (June 2025) on complex numbers in this environment. I’ve already solved it using pen and paper. My goal is also to illustrate the different results graphically, for pedagogical purposes, so I’d like some guidance to translate my pen-and-paper solution.

Bac_25_SM_Complexes.mw

Epreuve_Bac_SM_2025_Ss1_Sol-Exo-02.pdf

I need to use a procedure where one of the parameters is a function. Conceptually, this seems straightforward, but I’m encountering unexpected behavior. Here’s a minimal example of my approach:

f1:=proc(t::numeric, fn::function)::numeric;
return fn(t+1)+1
end proc;

However, none of the following calls return the correct result:

f1(2, sin);
f1(2, sin());
f1(2, sin(x));
f1(2, u-> u^2);

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!

we have a lot term which we add thus term we can get something near to our solution but i don't know how it is work , did any one did pade approximate of series solution?

Download pade-approximate.mw