I want to integrate the following cumulative distribution function with variable bounds but maple returns the integral.

>with(Statistics);

>N := RandomVariable(Normal(0, 1)):

>a := (ln(98.53*(1/95))+(0.1e-1+.5*x^2)*.5)/(x*sqrt(.5))

>y:= CDF(N, a, inert = true);

How do i make maple return a function of x instead of an integral?

I'm trying to write the cumulative distribution function into maple but I seem to get an error. The code is:

>with(Statistics):

>N:=RandomVariable(Normal(0,1)):

>CDF(N,t,inert=true);

I get an error message "Error, (in Statistics:-CDF) unexpected parameters: inert = true".

It used to work, maybe because I was using a newer version of Maple.

http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=math_etds

Example 3.23 in page 24

degree(2*z^2 + z + 2); #2

how to convert rational function to into (something) - (something) + (something) like in the example

the example 's rational function is 2*z^2+z+2

if rational function is has denominator how to calculate?

2z^2 + z + 2 =

z+2
3


−

z−2
3


+

z+1
2


−

z−4
2


+

z
1


−

z−8
1

when calculate delta p1, what is bi? how to calculate like the example's one?

(z+i-1 i+1-j) - (z+i-bi-1 i+1-1)

sum(d,i=j) (z+i-1 i+1-j) - (z+i-bi-1 i+1-1)

3.23
(z 1) - (z-bi 1)

how to do the expansion in step 3, as i use right shift that can not calculate the same result as in the example.

x0*x1/x0 = x1; # not same as in the example for I

x1^4*x2/x1 = x2*x1^3;  # not same as in the example for I

finally would like to apply to hilbert series 1/((1+z)*(1+z^2))

Joe Riel,

I am interested in making some adjustments to the Syrup package to help tailor it to my needs (expanded error descriptions, variable partial differentiations, and others).   A little over a year ago I had some dialog about how to make Syrup changes, but the program I was working on at the time, cancelled the Maple effort...

I need guidance on (1) how the Maple code is structured so I may explore modest changes, (2) what suggestion do you have on the easiest/smartest code development environment, (3) how to compile the changed code, then (4) how to rerun the revised Syrup.

Thank you and happy holidays.
Jeff Belue

My Maple is apparently getting rusty!  Question: how do I recognize a finite constant?

type(Pi, finite) is false (by design, apparently), while type(infinity, constant) is true.  So now I don't know quite what to 'ask' maple!

For those who have the Clickable Calculus Study Guide for Maple 18, please note that we have released an update to this ebook, which provides corrections and improvements to the text and examples. 

This update is available through the automatic updates system (Tools>Check for Updates) and from the download section of our website.

eithne

Maple 15 does not allow me to do even small changes after executing even the smallest bit of command. Is there a way to overwrite this default setting and force Maple to undo? Do the newer versions of Maple provide this functionality and what is the purpose of undo getting deactivated after a command, at least it should be enabled for the input?

Hi, I am using Maple 18 and struggling with plotting Newton's Method.

I am wanting use the function f(x)=x^3 +cx + 1 where c is a parameter and uses 100 parameter values between -2 and 0, with 100 iterations of each parameter.

Any help would be brilliant.

Thanks in advance,

Neil

deqn4 := {4*eta^4*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta))*(diff(f(eta), eta))-12*eta^3*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta))*f(eta)+12*eta^4*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))*(diff(f(eta), eta))-36*eta^3*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))*f(eta)-24*eta^3*(diff(f(eta), eta))^2+12*eta^2*(diff(f(eta), eta))*f(eta)-36*eta*f(eta)^2-4*eta^3*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))*(diff(f(eta), eta))-12*eta^2*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))*f(eta)+12*eta^3*f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta))+36*eta^2*f(eta)^2-4*eta^3*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta, eta))-12*eta^3*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta))+12*eta^2*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))-12*eta*(diff(f(eta), eta))+24*f(eta) = 0};
/
| 4 / d / d / d \\\ / d \
< 4 eta |----- |----- |----- f(eta)||| |----- f(eta)|
| \ deta \ deta \ deta /// \ deta /
\

3 / d / d / d \\\
- 12 eta |----- |----- |----- f(eta)||| f(eta)
\ deta \ deta \ deta ///

4 / d / d \\ / d \
+ 12 eta |----- |----- f(eta)|| |----- f(eta)|
\ deta \ deta // \ deta /

3 / d / d \\
- 36 eta |----- |----- f(eta)|| f(eta)
\ deta \ deta //

2
3 / d \ 2 / d \
- 24 eta |----- f(eta)| + 12 eta |----- f(eta)| f(eta)
\ deta / \ deta /

2
- 36 eta f(eta)

3 / d / d \\ / d \
- 4 eta |----- |----- f(eta)|| |----- f(eta)|
\ deta \ deta // \ deta /

2 / d / d \\
- 12 eta |----- |----- f(eta)|| f(eta)
\ deta \ deta //

3 / d \ 2 2
+ 12 eta f(eta) |----- f(eta)| + 36 eta f(eta)
\ deta /

3 / d / d / d / d \\\\
- 4 eta |----- |----- |----- |----- f(eta)||||
\ deta \ deta \ deta \ deta ////

3 / d / d / d \\\
- 12 eta |----- |----- |----- f(eta)|||
\ deta \ deta \ deta ///

2 / d / d \\ / d \
+ 12 eta |----- |----- f(eta)|| - 12 eta |----- f(eta)|
\ deta \ deta // \ deta /

\
|
+ 24 f(eta) = 0 >
|
/
init4 := { {f(0) = 1, (D(f))(0) = 0, ((D@@2)(f))(0) = 0, ((D@@3)(f))(0.1e-2) = 0} };
{{f(0) = 1, D(f)(0) = 0, @@(D, 2)(f)(0) = 0,

@@(D, 3)(f)(0.001) = 0}}
dsol4 := dsolve(deqn4 union init4, numeric, method=rkf45);

Error, (in dsolve/numeric/process_input) system must be entered as a set/list of expressions/equations

Hi,

I used to use windows 32 bit, but I have 64 bit windows now. I installed the MapleSim 6.4 and Maple 18 and try to run the simulations that I created with the 32 bit windows. I have this error 'Unable to compile (rc=1), please try again, and if that fails verify your Windows compiller installation'. Could you please let me know what should I do to eliminate this problem?

Best

Onder

i want to plot a arc that starting angle and finishing angle are variable

but it didn't show the arc there is my code

Hello,

      I would like to solve a system of 9 nonlinear equations, with the constraints on all 9 variables to be that they are nonnegative. How can I do this?

My code is below - I am trying NLPSolve and have tried solve, but am getting stuck.

with(Optimization);

restart; eq1 := 531062-S/(70*365)-(.187*(1/365))*(H+C+C1+C2)*S/N = 0;eq2 := (4/365*(T+C))*S/N-(.187*(1/365))*(H+C+C1+C2)*T/N-(1/(70*365)+1/(5*365))*T = 0; eq3 := (.187*(1/365))*(H+C+C1+C2)*S/N-(4/365)(T+C)*H/N-(1/(70*365)+1/(4*365))*H = 0; eq4 := (.187*(1/365))*(H+C+C1+C2)*T/N+(4/365*(T+C))*H/N-(1/(70*365)+3/(8*365)+.2*(1/365)+.1)*C = 0; eq5 := .1*C-(1/(70*365)+1/(4*365)+1/60+.5)*C1 = 0; eq6 := (1/60)*C1-(1/(70*365)+1/(4*365)+1/210+.5)*C2 = 0; eq7 := .5*C1-(1/(70*365)+1/60+0.1e-2)*CT1 = 0; eq8 := .5*C2-(1/(70*365)+1/210+(1/9)*(0.1e-2*7))*CT2+(1/60)*CT1 = 0; eq9 := N-S-T-H-C-C1-C2-CT1-CT2 = 0; soln := NLPSolve({eq1, eq2, eq3, eq4, eq5, eq6, eq7, eq8, eq9}, {C, C1, C2, CT1, CT2, H, N, S, T}, assume = nonnegative);

The problem is The square root of 16-x^2 over the interval [0,-4]  0 being the upper bound, -4 being the lower bound.  I have solved 3/4s of this problem but I don't understand what they mean by "Solve the definite integral exactly by geometry". 

I Want to plot only the intersection between this Surfaces 

z = sqrt(x^2+y^2)

y >= abs(x)

x^2+y^2+z^2 >= 4

x^2+y^2+z^2 <= 9

Anyone knows how ?

Thanks!

Greetings,

Maple 15 allows the following syntax

omega := sqrt(w0^2*(1+((z-zf)/z0)^2))

But it does not allow this one 

omega^2 := sqrt(w0^2*(1+((z-zf)/z0)^2))

Why is this so for functions and variables? Is there any way around this, I am really bugged by this issue. The Maple Math told me that the syntax was invalid so I had type the commands directly.