1) find  the direction in which f(x,y) increases most rapidly at the point P(1,2), and find the maximum rate of increase
of f at P.

Interpret 1) using the graph of f.

Let f(x,y) = 2+x^2 +1/4*(y^2)

Having solution of an inequations system, is there a way/function/algorithm to find a particular numeric solution (as simplex[minimize] can do) ?

ex:

Q := {1 < x - y, x + y < 1};

R := solve(Q);

      { x < 1 - y, y < 0, y + 1 < x }

manually it's easy to find some numeric solutions:

      y = -1, x = 1
      y = -2, x = 0

but I need an automatic way.

Thank you for your help
s.py

This Maple 13 so maybe things have been fixed. Here are four points whose convex hull consists of three points. Sometimes the result comes out correct, more often it does not. With numbers this small it shouldn't be an issue of roundoff. But changing digits changes the result!

Hi all

kx,ky is the wavenumber, how can I get the 4 cases of piecewise function according to kx=0,kx≠0 and ky=0,ky≠0. Thanks

J := `assuming`([4*(int(int(JJ*exp(-I*(kx*x+ky*y))*sin(2*l*pi*x/a)*sin(2*k*pi*y/b), x = 0 .. a, AllSolutions), y = 0 .. b, AllSolutions))/(a*b)], [k::posint, l::posint, a > 0, b > 0, JJ > 0])

Let a planar polygon P without selfintersections be given through the plottools:-polygon command.
How to find its triangulation as a set of triangles (The indication of common sides is desired too.) in an optimal way with Maple? This is used in the finite element method.

Hi all,

I am stuck with the following problem:

convert(cos(alpha), exp); works fine for me.

Once I have the trigonometric functions in a matrix, it does not work any more:

In the latter line, A keeps the trigonometric functions. Why is this the case? Is there any way to force maple to keep the complex exponentials instead of trigonometric functions?

I am using LinearAlgebra and VectorCalculus.

Best Regards

Wassja

Ok guys, so i have a bunch of datapoints in 3d (x,y,z)

I'm trying to calculate an equation using maple that will express z as a function of x and y.

I've been browesing around for like 2 hours now with no hope. Help?

Der Group,

after updating to OS X Yosemite the License data of Maple 18 are invalid. What can I do?

Yours

Berthold

Hi Maple friends.

If I have y=-x^2+9 and y=x+3, how can I find the area that is bounded by the functions? 

Easy enough to calculate by hand, but I need to use Maple to check my answers. Most preferably I'd like to use the Maple context menu to get the result, but any solution will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Can anyone tell me where I can find tutorial explaining how to solve laplace transform? I need a tutorial that explains starting with simple resolution to advanced resolution.

Hi all;

I have following program for plotting numerous function using hybrid functions.

if g1(t) is arbitrary function and g2(t) is its approximate by hybrid functions, I want to have a table of g1(t)-g2(t) for different value of t. but the result is without numeric values. what part is wrong????

best wishes

OHB.mws

Mahmood   Dadkhah

Ph.D Candidate

Applied Mathematics Department

How to calculate the Amplitude of two combined sinusoidal of different frequency and phase of a general equation as:

Thanks

I need to know if the Software Maple solve, step-by-step series of Fourier and Laplace transforms? The Maple command has to solve step by step series of Fourier and Laplace transforms? or commands show only the direct solution?

Hi again,

I am lost... again. I worked with the Physics package and have obtained my result in form of a lengthy equation of commutators of non-commuting objects. So basically my problem is solved, except that I now want to compute some examples to see, if everything is correct. For that purpose I want to replace now the non-commuting objects with explicit matrices, compute the result and see if it agrees with numerical studies. However, I have no clue which command to use, because if I try it with subs, then the multiplication is of the wrong type and Maple won't multiply my matrices. I tried to use eval but wasn't successful.

Here is an exampe to see what I mean.

Test2.mw

Thank you for your time

NOh

The following MWE shows what I mean:

with(Physics):Setup(mathematical=true):

Setup(noncommutativeprefix={MX,MY,MZ});

test:=proc()

    local eq;

    eq:=-Commutator(MX,MY)-Commutator(MZ,MY);

    eq:=simplify(subs(MX=-MZ,eq));

    return eq;

end proc:

test();  # yields -[-MZ,MY] - [MZ,MY]

%  # yields 0

Any ideas how I can solve this? I would like to return the simplified version.