I just found that Maple 17 and Maple 16 do not have the option "output=string" in the latex command.

And I need a way to convert the Latex generated to the screen to a string and save it to a variable like I can do with Maple 2017

Here is an example. In current Maple 2017 this works

result_of_int:=int((-5+3*x)^2/(2*x-1)^(7/2),x):
my_latex:= latex(result_of_int,output=string);

But in Maple 16, it gives an error

If I remove the output, then the result is not string.

How to capture the above output which is on the screen and save it as string in a variable?

I do not want to send the output to a file as is. I need to first convert it to a string, and save
it to variable first.

I have a system of equations that can't be solved analytically, but can be solved using fsolve. I would like to plot the solution for one of the unknowns as a function of a parameter "DV" that is in a few of the equations. There are two issues at hand. First, even if I give DV a numerical value, the solutions are of the form { x = 0.23, y = 4.56 }, a form that plot( ) obviously can't handle directly. Generally I have dealt with this by using the op( ) command to pick out the solution I want; is there a better way?

But even after I have the solution I want, fsolve( ) won't work until I give it a value for DV. Thus a plot( ) command like

   plot(op(2, op(2, fsolve({e1, e2}, {x, y})), DV = -1 .. 1)

fails with an "Error, (in fsolve) DV is in the equation, and is not solved for" error.

There's got to be an esy way to do this!

I found from this forum that to plot a 2D array of points use can be made of the Maple procedure surfdata.
 

Does anyone have suggestions on how to plot contours in (preferrably) Maple 16 or Maple 17?

I tried the following

Output := Array(-10 .. 10, -10 .. 10, proc (i, j) options operator, arrow; i^2+j^2 end proc):
F := proc (x, y) -> x^2+y^2 end proc:
surfdata(Output, color = F, dimension = 2);

but "the option dimension = 2" is a Maple 18 addition.

Ideally, I would like also to be able to plot contours with options found in the procedure
contourplot

Hi, i encountered this, error, and the link to the help page was broken.

Error, (in RootOf) expression independent of _S000100
 

I don't recall ever changing any settings in my copy of Maple 16. But for some reason, I tried to make a plot and it spit out line-printed output rather than a regular plot.

How do I change this back? I have no use for line-printed output.

lineprinted_fail.mw
 

Download lineprinted_fail.mw

Hello,

I am solving a simple system of algebraic equations in a "for" loop. I would like to write all the values of solutions to a matrix, but I only get the symbols. Here is my code:

A:=1:E:=0.1:L0:=<5,5,5,5>:m0g:=0.05:u:=<-5/4,-1/4,-3/4,-1/4>:v:=<-1/2,-3/2,1/2,1/2>:w:=<0,1,0,-1>:
Force:=Matrix(m,2);
for i from 1 to m do
 r1||i:=H||i*L0(i)/(A*E)+H||i/m0g*(arcsinh(V_A||i/H||i)+arcsinh((m0g*L0(i)-V_A||i)/H||i))-sqrt(u(i)^2+v(i)^2);
 r2||i:=V_A||i*L0(i)/(A*E)*(m0g*L0(i)/(2*V_A||i)-1)+H||i/m0g*(sqrt(1+((m0g*L0(i)-V_A||i)/H||i)^2)-sqrt(1+(V_A||i/H||i)^2))-abs(w(i));
 rozw||i:=fsolve({r1||i, r2||i}, {H||i,V_A||i},H||i=0..1);Force(i,1):=H||i;Force(i,2):=V_A||i;subs(rozw||i,Force(i,..));
end do:
evalf(Force);

Thanks in advance,

Iza

Let be the number z so that |z+3-2*I| + |z-3-8*I| = 6*sqrt(2). Find min and max of the modulus of z. How can I find min and max of modulus of z with Maple.

Thank for your help!

Maple 16 code

N1 := FileTools[Text][CountLines](g)

I encounter an error message

in FileTools:-Text:-CountLines) permission denied

What  went wrong ?  This never happened before

I  re install  Maple 16, the same error persists.

Please help

Martin
 

Please help me on this :

Download untitle_2_(1).mw

Download 2222222222222222222.mw

> restart; 
> A[0] := 10^(-3); a := 10^5;
> sys := diff(R(theta), theta) = A[0]*exp(2*mu(theta))*sin(theta)/(2*a), R(theta) = 2*exp(-2*mu(theta))*(1-(diff(mu(theta), `$`(theta, 2)))-cot(theta)*(diff(mu(theta), theta)));
> cond := R(0) = 10^(-5), mu(0) = 118.92, (D(mu))(0) = 0;
> F := dsolve({cond, sys}, [R(theta), mu(theta)], numeric);
> with(plots);
> odeplot(F, [theta, R(theta)], 0 .. 3.14, color = black, thickness = 3, linestyle = 4)
> odeplot(F, [theta, mu(theta)], 0 .. 3.14, color = blue, thickness = 3, linestyle = 1)

After last two lines maple writes:

Warning, cannot evaluate the solution past the initial point, problem may be complex, initially singular or improperly set up

And gives me empty plots. I can't figure out where an error can be. Some things I noticed:

Maple doesn't calculate the system before and after zero. If I change the range from 0..3.14 to -10..10 or to 0.00001..0.00001, it gives me 2 errors for 1 plot.

Also if I change the condition mu(0) = 118.92 to mu(0) = 1 or mu(0) = 50 or mu(0) = 80, it works. After ~80 it gives an error. I can't imagine where could appear a division by 0 or some other mistake.

I have been trying to find a solution for the equation below. Is there a non numerical explicit solution?
 

Download Jacobi_Diff_eqn_Mapleprime_post.mw

When I try the example from Maple Help for LPSolve (I use Windows)

with(Optimization);
LPSolve(-4*x-5*y, {0 <= x, 0 <= y, x+2*y <= 6, 5*x+4*y <= 20});

I do not get the same solution like in the example: [-19., [x = 2.66666666666667, y = 1.66666666666667]]
Instead I get

Warning, problem appears to be unbounded
            [0., [x = HFloat(0.0), y = HFloat(0.0)]]

My Professor uses the same version, but with Linux and do not have such problems. Why my installation does not solve the standart Help example?

Thank you

f1:=(1/s^2)^N;

Maple failed to convert it into  f1:=s^(-2N);

Hi! 

Tried to solve the PDE below (q and p are time-dependent variabels, q(t),p(t)):

pde := diff(rho(t, q, p), t) = -(diff(rho(t, q, p), q))*p+(diff(rho(t, q, p), p))*(2*q+2);
          

pdsolve(pde, rho(t, q, p));
           

And got the answer: 

rho(t, q, p) = _F1(p^2+2*q^2+4*q, -(1/2)*sqrt(2)*arctan((q+1)*sqrt(2)*(1/sqrt(p^2)))+t)

But I'm not sure how to interpret the result. I understand that  _F1 is an arbitrary function, but then I get confused with the comma? I thought that I'd get a function of q and p, where they depend on t. 

Best regards
Sannis