I just noticed something funny. If I use the left side tool of Maple to define a matrix with zero entries and then change some entries and take determinant, then Maple treats zeros as symbold!!!! If I have to define my matrix completely myself, then what is the use of this tool?

Dear Friends, 

I would appreciate your help in resolving some issues. Let me describe my dummy code and the issues I am having. 

I want to know the proper value of two parameters beta and `ΔA` in a tripe integral function  by the NonlinearFit command.The triple integral function is complex.

The code of function is below:

int(tan(beta)^2*exp(-Pi*tan(beta)^2*((x-varepsilon)^2+(0-varsigma)^2)/eta^2)/eta^2, [eta = 22.83-sqrt((5.83+`ΔA`)^2-varepsilon^2) .. 22.83+sqrt((5.83+`ΔA`)^2-varepsilon^2), varepsilon = -5.83-`ΔA` .. 5.83+`ΔA`, varsigma = -1 .. 1])-(int(tan(beta)^2*exp(-Pi*tan(beta)^2*((x-varepsilon)^2+(0-varsigma)^2)/eta^2)/eta^2, [eta = 22.83-sqrt(5.83^2-varepsilon^2) .. 22.83+sqrt(5.83^2-varepsilon^2), varepsilon = -5.83 .. 5.83, varsigma = -1 .. 1])) 

And this is the complete code:

datax := [-8, -4.5, -.5, 4.5, 8, 11.5, 14.5];

datay := [0.287e-2, 0.266e-2, 0.259e-2, 0.199e-2, 0.164e-2, 0.113e-2, 0.78e-3];

f := NonlinearFit(int(tan(beta)^2*exp(-Pi*tan(beta)^2*((x-varepsilon)^2+(0-varsigma)^2)/eta^2)/eta^2, [eta = 22.83-sqrt((5.83+`ΔA`)^2-varepsilon^2) .. 22.83+sqrt((5.83+`ΔA`)^2-varepsilon^2), varepsilon = -5.83-`ΔA` .. 5.83+`ΔA`, varsigma = -1 .. 1])-(int(tan(beta)^2*exp(-Pi*tan(beta)^2*((x-varepsilon)^2+(0-varsigma)^2)/eta^2)/eta^2, [eta = 22.83-sqrt(5.83^2-varepsilon^2) .. 22.83+sqrt(5.83^2-varepsilon^2), varepsilon = -5.83 .. 5.83, varsigma = -1 .. 1])), datax, datay, x)

I try to run it and get the value of parameters beta and `ΔA` ,but I keep getting this error,

Error, (in Statistics:-NonlinearFit) integration range or variable must be specified in the second argument, got HFloat(1.0) = HFloat(16.073603031200726) .. HFloat(29.58639696879927)
Does someone how to deal with this problem?

I would sincerely appreciate any inputs in this regard. 

Ok so as title says that is what i need, or the process of changing the document property listing that is generated when i start a new worksheet. 

The reason being is that of course the obvious solution is for me to have a personalized template for a worksheet with the desired attribute listing, which i have, but the trouble is i have already generated a large number of archive entries in a database or "library" of worksheets that i am building that have the standard attribute listing, and for the new functionality that i have chosen i rely on having the specific custom attribute listing for the new template, and i want to implement this functionality into use for the existing database entries as well as the future ones created, without having to copy and paste things for each of the existing entries for the obvious reason that this is boring and annoying

I using Maple 18 (not Maple 2018) and I'm trying to figure out how to grab earthquake data from earthquakescanada database from here http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca//stndon/NEDB-BNDS/bull-en.php using the HTTP requests.

First I used the default search within the web browser, and get a new address which I enter as the URL

HTTP:-Get("http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca//stndon/NEDB-BNDS/bull-en.php?time_start=2018%2F04%2F23+22%3A47%3A00&time_end=2018%2F05%2F23+22%3A47%3A00&depth_min=0&depth_max=100&mag_min=-3&mag_max=9.9&shape_type=region&radius_center_lat=50&radius_center_lon=-95&radius_radius=1000&region_north=90&region_south=41&region_east=-40&region_west=-150&eq_type_L=1&display_list=1&list_sort=date&list_order=a&tpl_output=html&submited=1"

It takes a long time to download the information and would require HTML surgery but changing the option for output to txt or csv, it's faster and in a much more readable form.  However it's not in a table or Array format, it has become a string.

Is there any way to use ImportMatrix, or ImportData to get a better format of the information?  - both give errors in Maple18.  Or am I stuck trying to use string surgery in Maple 18?  The Import command isn't available until Maple 2016 (I don't mean the Import command within ExcelTools) and I believe that works in Maple 2018 however I'm at a loss for trying to use it in Maple 18. 

I need some help. I'm trying to solve this system of equations, but maple says the solutions may have been lost.

I don't know why. Here are the equations:

I have four equations,very unknown variables in the equation.

I am trying to solve for any 4 unknowns ,not must had be Zoo1.Zoo2.th1.th2,it can be Za1.Za2.Zb1.Zb2.  

Any help  would be greatly appreciated.

    /  /                                                    0.5
    |  |/         2                                        \   
 int\x \\D(c[2]) x  + 2 c[2] D(x) x + D(c[1]) x + c[1] D(x)/   

                                              \            \
            2             2                1.5|            |
    + c[2] x  + c[1] x - x  - 1.504505556 x   /, x = 0 .. 1/
   /   /                                                    0.5
   | 2 |/         2                                        \   
int\x  \\D(c[2]) x  + 2 c[2] D(x) x + D(c[1]) x + c[1] D(x)/   

                                             \            \
           2             2                1.5|            |
   + c[2] x  + c[1] x - x  - 1.504505556 x   /, x = 0 .. 1/
 

Hi,

I naively thought that
f := t -> Some expression containing t
and
f := unapply(Some expression containing t, t)
where two different ways to define the same function f.

Recently I defined f and g this way
X := RandomVariable(Normal(m, s)):
U := Sample(X, 30000) ;  
f := t -> PDF(X, t);
g := unapply(PDF(X, t), t);

Could you explain me why f~(U) exectues in about 10 seconds and g~(U) in less than 0.1 s ?

Thanks in advance

 

Hellow , Any body can help me to write the codes for the differential equation to solve by Galerkin finite element method by four elements by taking step size h=pi/2 and compare with homotropy method by plotting the graph of Galerkin method, homotropy method and exact, here is my codes

ode := diff(y(x), x, x) + y(x)-1=0:
ics := y(0) = 0, y(2*pi) = 0:
dsolve({ics, ode}):
 

How to do a full reinstall so that no settings are kept?

I tried deleting the maple 2017 folder in program files after I uninstalled but that did not help.

I need my results are nice and neat in final presentation so how can I change the way it present matrix in maple, its so messy in hear like picture . It happend resulted in Maple can reduce the same ratio such as As^2+Bs^2=(A+B)s^2, I tried all my best to find way to simply it but its so hard due to my noob in maple. Please help me make it nice and neat in array of matrix [    ]. 

Hello everyone

I am new in mapple software and i am facing some proplem to tackle  Laplace equation and Poisson equation. I want to find out the potential psi given in two equations 

I want to solve following equ with finite difference method in order to find potential psi .In the second equation  n = concentration of electrons  ,p= concentration of holes and C= additional concentration ,q is electronic charge .

Can anyone suggeset how I can solve this type of partial differential equation with numerical method (FDM) in mapple?

Can we use this euler lagrange command for the system of pde's?

If we have a system without lagrangian then euler opertor is applied corresponding to three dependent variables.

so we have three equations but in this euler lagrange command no dependent variable is mentioned.   

When I right-click on a Matrix, the cursor rotates, but the context menu does not open at all (in Maple 2017, in document mode, in Win 10).
Any suggestions - Anyone else with this problem?

Just like the title described, I have encountered an error when I use the command "expand". Actually, I just follow the example, but it doesn't work. Please help me or tell me how can I solve it in other commands.

restart;
alias(epsilon = e, omega = w, omega[0] = w0, t[1] = t1, t[2] = t2); e := proc (t1, t2) options operator, arrow; e end proc; w0 := proc (t1, t2) options operator, arrow; w0 end proc; a := proc (t1, t2) options operator, arrow; a end proc; f := proc (t1, t2) options operator, arrow; f end proc; mu := proc (t1, t2) options operator, arrow; mu end proc;
ode := (D@@2)(u)+2*mu*e*D(u)+w0^2*u+e*w0^2*u^3-e*f*cos(omega*t) = 0;
                                               2  
     @@(D, 2)(u) + 2 mu epsilon D(u) + omega[0]  u

                          2  3                             
        + epsilon omega[0]  u  - epsilon f cos(omega t) = 0
e_oredr := 1;
ode := simplify(subs(D = sum('e^(i-1)*D[i]', 'i' = 1 .. e_oredr+1), ode), {e^(e_oredr+1) = 0});
 / 3         2                                                 
 \u  omega[0]  + 2 (epsilon D[2] + D[1])(u) mu - cos(omega t) f

                  \                   2                   
    + 2 D[1, 2](u)/ epsilon + omega[0]  u + D[1, 1](u) = 0
simplify(collect(%, e), {e^(e_oredr+1) = 0});

u := sum('v[i]*e^i', 'i' = 0 .. e_oredr);
                      epsilon v[1] + v[0]
ode := simplify(collect(ode, e), {e^2 = 0});
for i from 0 to e_oredr do eq[i] := coeff(lhs(ode), e, i) = 0 end do;
                       2                         
               omega[0]  v[0] + D[1, 1](v[0]) = 0
       3         2           2                       
   v[0]  omega[0]  + omega[0]  v[1] + 2 D[1](v[0]) mu

      - cos(omega t) f + 2 D[1, 2](v[0]) + D[1, 1](v[1]) = 0
remove(has, lhs(eq[1]), cos); convert(%(t1, t2), diff);
eq[1] := %-convert(f*cos(sigma*t2+t1*w0), 'exp');

v[0] := A(t2)*cos(w0*t1+B(t2)); convert(%, 'exp'); v[0] := unapply(%, t1, t2);
                         /1                             
       (t1, t2) -> A(t2) |- exp(I (omega[0] t1 + B(t2)))
                         \2                             

            1                              \
          + - exp(-I (omega[0] t1 + B(t2)))|
            2                              /

expand(eq[1]);
Error, (in property/ConvertProperty) invalid input: PropRange uses a 2nd argument, b, which is missing
collect(%, exp(I*w0*t1));
Error, (in collect) invalid 1st argument proc (t1, t2) options operator, arrow; A(t2)*((1/2)*exp(I*(w0*t1+B(t2)))+(1/2)*exp(-I*(w0*t1+B(t2)))) end proc
coeff(%, exp(I*w0*t1));
map(proc (x) options operator, arrow; x*exp(-I*B(t2)) end proc, %);
combine(%, 'exp');
subs(I*B(t2) = I*sigma*t2-I*C(t2), B(t2) = sigma*t2-C(t2), %);
conds := combine(%, 'exp');
                               0

With this feature, it requires the worksheet from which to import a result from executing it from the worksheet with the Run worksheet command to have section titles as Input  and Calculation respectively.

This is a really helpful feature, but what i need is to "fetch" the content from a number of worksheets in a folder from a specified particular section name, for a number of different section names.