I have currently a Maple session running with only one open worksheet.

The worksheet only contains an input line with the name "a" and an output line with the name "a".

The fan of my laptop is running full throttle and the task manager displays 10% CPU usage and a very high power usage (3 mserver.exe running, the process with the cpu load is javaw.exe. Suspending this process shuts down the fan).

After about an hour I decided to ask. While typing this post (in Firefox, probably unrelated) the CPU usage went down and the fan went quite. The total system CPU usage is now down to 2%.

Has anybody seen the same? What could have cause it? It's not the first time I observe this. Anything that I could check before restarting Maple? All on Windows 10 after system restart.

I was not expecting to see step-by-step for this ode, but why does it give internal error instead of saying not supported? 

Am I doing something wrong in the call? Unfortunately, this Maple internal error can't be trapped at user level. Which means the whole program terminates also.

Download too_many_Levels_odesteps_oct_14_2024.mw

I can't understand why Maple interprets 1 .05  as 1 * 5 = 5 , and 2 .05  as 2 * 5 = 10 . Note the space between 1 and .05
In a different calculation I accidentally inserted a space between 1 and .05, and received a strange answer, and finally narrowed it down to a space.
But now I wonder why it is it is interpreting this way. Also I see that 2  0.05 produces an error. But  2 .05 is treated as 10. There is an implied multiplication? But the multiplication should be 2 * .05 , which is 1 and not 10.

i found thus condition which if we substitute in equation must be equal to zero, i don't know  how i can get zero

test_pde1.mw

I have encountered an issue: eq1 is not satisfied, though eq2 is satisfied for the parametric value (10). I need assistance in finding a way to ensure that both equations are satisfied simultaneously. Please provide guidance or suggest a potential approach for addressing this issue.verf_kk.mw

I have  a big problem in transformation How we can do suh transformation in  type of  procure  without use any hand work for example in physic abs|-| remove the exponential term how the maple remove that term automatically and collect all term and do my transformation this example is really hard one which is must do a lot by hand and mixed them which maybe a week take my time to get results and how i reach the results without spending that time i have a result of this equation and i am try to get but i don't know the results of this person is correct or not but i will share in here,  i did some try i will share in here too if in DEchange add U(xi) it will work and give me the other step but i need something more effective, when q^* is conjugate of q =exp(-ipsi(x,t))U(xi)

Download find_ODE.mw

Hi,

I just got 2 questions regarding symbols and answers in MapleFlow (I might be doing something wrong here).

- In trying to input the integral int(F(x), x = -pi/5 .. pi/5) - this is just an example! - as a symbol,

MapleFlow doesn´t accept fractions or multiplications for bondaries values, unless I input "int(F(x), x = -pi/5 .. pi/5 =". Is there anyway to do it?

- is it possible to have the answer as , like in Maple, instead of ()symbolic expression) or 1.18 (numeric expression)?

Thanks in advance for your help.

How can I check if a name has been used/entered already but was not assigned to a value

The variable palette only lists assigned names.

I tried unames() but this lists all unassigned names. A 'user' option (which filters for user-assigned names) as in anames() does not seem to exist.

One of my failed attempts (in 1D-Math):

restart;
unames():
initial_unames := {%}:
new_name;
{unames()} minus initial_unames; # should ideally return a reduced set containing new_name;
has(%,new_name)

What else can be done? (I am probably overlooking something very simple.)

@Rouben Rostamian  

Dear Sir Professor Rostamian my name is Viorel Popescu from the Polytechnic University of Bucharest if you remember in the summer of 2019 you helped me to solve the equation: rH''(r)+H'(r)+(rk^2-r^2*b^2/R^2)H(r)=0 where k, b, and R are real constants positive number, with condition H(R)=0 and H'(1/R)=R. I appreciate it very much, please I'm in a similarly embarrassing situation to beg you for an answer. I want to find the equation of audion and complete the experiment http://www.michaelvio.byethost8.com/Audion.pdf

My account in Maple Primes is the same michaelvio (35) as the email michaelvio@yahoo.com and also @gmail.com it's an experiment that I want to make for my PhD. Practically I suppose that the energy can be approx. as a series of power of frequency t from I selected severaral terms Ea := 0.00762014687*t + a*t^2 + b*t^3 + c*t^4 + d*t^5 and I guess that satisfies an equation as in the document. The case of photons is beyond my possibility, but a little help from a distinguished Professor as you should cheer me up Audion1.mw

Audion.docx

Please help! 

In the rectangular Cartesian coordinate system, three straight lines gA, gB, gC are given, which are not all parallel to each other. Another straight line g and the points Oa, Ob, Oc on it are given. A triangle ABC is to be constructed, one of whose vertices lies on gA, gB or gC and the triangle sides a, b and c (or their extensions) each run through Oa, Ob or Oc.
We are looking for the coordinates of the vertices A, B, C.
In a purely constructive solution, the calculation can be omitted.

Hello,

I noticed that the Linearly Implicit Euler method (also known as the Semi-Implicit Euler method) is not available in Maple's built-in ODE solvers. This method is useful for stiff ODEs, where part of the function is treated implicitly (for the linear term) and part is treated explicitly (for the non-linear term).

I know that the Linearly Implicit Euler method is a specialized method that probably does not find enough widespread use to justify its inclusion as a standard feature in Maple, especially given Maple's focus on numerical methods such as Runge-Kutta methods and fully implicit methods for rigid equations.

I’m wondering:

1. Why isn’t this method included in Maple’s standard set of numerical solvers?
2. How can I implement this method in my own code in Maple to solve stiff ODEs?

Any guidance or examples of implementation would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you!

Linearly_Implicit_Method.pdf

I need to modify only one entry in a .m file (which happens to be table entry). How do I do this?

Dear all, I tried to run the test.java example in the Eclipse IDE but receive the following error message:

Error: Unable to initialize main class examples.test2
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/maplesoft/externalcall/MapleException

May be there is s.o. who has an idea.

Thanks

The usual ODE must be solved:
y´´*(y^3-y)+y´^2 *(y^2+1)=0
"Dangerous places" of the definition domain must be described: Where are the general solution y(x) and its derivatives continuous?

I've been evaluating Threads (since I can use Mutex in it, which is not supported in Grid).

I noticed that when measuring time to evaluate same integral inside thread it takes about 3 times as long as outside thread.

I am using time[real] to measure the time. (is this not the correct way to do this with Threads?)

Still, using threads was faster overall to integrate 10 different integrals than doing these sequentially one by one. 

When integrating 10 _different_ integrals using Threads, the total time was about 19 seconds.  While when done sequentially the overall time was about 50 seconds.  I used different integrals, to make sure Maple does not use result in its cache.

So using Threads was almost 3 times as fast, even when each int() call takes 3 times as long. (Because all the int() calls were done in parallel). 

But It seems there is some overhead to calling library function from inside Thread? (but time is compensated for since everthing is done in parallel now). Is this documented somewhere? It could be, I did not read every help page on Threads. Just started learning in early today.

But my main question is: Why int() takes 3 times as long inside Thread than outside?  I was expecting it to take similar time. Or may be I am not measuring time correctly inside Thread?

Attached test worksheet.

Download why_int_timing_different_in_thread.mw