@Carl Love well i guess i would start with convincing myself that  the jth student and the kth student have never change the state of the same locker if j and k are coprime.

but yeah i need to sleep now like im at that point the mind just shuts down on auto so i guess ill edit this as i go in morning

@Carl Love  anyway ill take you word for they are definately more elementary that what i was trying to prove so ill spill the beans on the original crime scene here this was the one i felt to be important once i found another thing that i can elaborate on if you agree that for this one  i am at least functioning rationally here enough to not exclude it to be true, again im not going to be able to prove it directly for a number of years IF i work alot harder than i have done but you know how it is when you get bored.

that will at least give weight to me bothering with seeing what the connection could be to the original stuff, im only just working anti divisors into my "framework of vague understanding about stuff" is a less dignifying way, but probably more accurate description of my activities.

Again, it is pure speculation here, in that it just seems to be true no matter what ive enumerated thus far, so its just one of those things i end up archiving for a point where im a million times more compentent at proofs than i am currently

Download not_am_not_sure_why_i_decided_is_true_but_im_tired_seems_legit.mw

@Adam Ledger  I will need like a few graduate level text references for elementary part, like it is really really really looking intimately related to specifically whats got me on the scratch and stare for the last few days, so i will need quotes from a bunch of said people have stated to be elementary because i need to consider that alot of people enjoy the results of my loss of temperment  with that trigger "everyone knows that" because of how many people know how often i do tend to get excited about stuff that really is elementary, and ive just somehow algebraically obfuscated that fact from my immeadiate realization, often when im tired anyway i would prefer to take 3 years before answering literally anything if im still unsure rather than put on the circus of me failing really bad in immeadiate succession.

like i will laugh about it in enough time to not be embarassed anyway, moral of the story is that facebook, in general is a negative form of interaction in many regards and a social trend that needs to get started is people going to specific domains for specific interests.  Yeah have a cry chuds you can't ban me from here,  i know, i too was taken in by the that particular agency with the goal of centralizing intelligence, i mean er.... social networking yes...social networking...   to a specific domain beng facebook.com but all that needs to be done to make it unpopular is encourage people to look at some of the really messed up stuff circulated in the um "developing" regions of the world for that app. which is also pretty much whats app. lort 

@Carl Love ok ok i just saw this i really dont like time constraints but fine i guess if i dont get there in a few hours that is pretty standard, also ok 16 year old college that is exactly the kind of thing that grants self belief prior to a challenge proposed to a 35 year old with a promising career in well, im  not exactly sure what that will be but so far it's been cleanig  stuff thats gross, and driving people around that seem to have a really severe thyriod imbalance, or I'm just the type to naturally anger people when I express myself.

Probably a little bit of column A little bit of column B anyway please dont say where said college was attended I wasnt trying to be clever quoting the name of that guy or what have you it just happened to be the name of the dude that wrote the code for the sequence of numbers that has a large intercection with the ones i enumerated before  yesterday's or the day before, wait... yesterday yes.

@vv  Yes thankyou very much incredibly more efficient for this i was just in the process of plotting the exact pattern that seems to emerge for a parameterization of the argument in two variables  that had me curious, unfortunately my interface freezes quite often when i produce 3d plots which i know has something to do with a graphics card or something but thats about as far as i go in ever fixing the problem. But if i give it 30 mins the restoring the back up usually brings it back upon restarting maple so i will actually post it as some kind of evidence i indeed had a "direction" of enquiry here

@vv ah true i never thought to utilize ifactors i guess this is one of the reasons for it producing output in the format that it does! I remember the first time I used ifactors it got me in a grumpy mood because I felt as if it is giving me the  prime bases AND their multiplicities in the factorization of the argument unnecessarily in that i would only ever want to call one or the other, and also some of my ambivalence towards using it is also that I know i always end up taking a look at the showstat(), then finding a list of inbuilt functions that I confused about, which leads to a tantrum of sorts but i guess i have to be an adult about these things at some point 

@tomleslie Yeah i will take another look at the wikipedia article to be honest its just a worksheet i dug out of my archives from years ago, and i definitely recall having troubles finding an exact match in terms of wikipedia content for the formula that is used for the maple curve fitting function, and decided to bit bash it out as shown, then in my usual style of the time delete all of my messy working out leaving only the expression that fits. (at least inductively in terms of evaluating for the enumerations for as shown)

This of course being a total disadvantage now, coming back to attempt to arrive at a greater depth of understanding other than "this equals that".

But yep thanks anyway I suppose the only thing i can really do is repeat the bit bashing exercise but with commentary enabling me to formalize a derivation along the way. Or build a time machine, travel back 4 or 5 years and threaten my former self with some form of humilation or punishment if he doesn't explain to himself every step he is taking, but that seems like over kill. 

@tomleslie ok well let me copy and paste this response into a worksheet and ill work on understanding what you mean, and if you want to know why, its because i did'nt exactly come pre equipped with the self discipline to change things for the better even if they work for me most times, do you understand me? Like it took me longer than most to reach the maturity to see that i should look at the way others do things first before deciding my way is the only way? ok different worlds.

anyway thankyou Tom Leslie, you have improved my code via contributing constructive criticism, on the proviso that i now take this on board and make notes for new habits needed and old habits to be erased!

@Carl Love It turned out that i actually just had a variable on the right hand side of the arrow operator that i hadn't declared on the left handside as an input, but I posted about it seeings I have this habit of taking everything literally, so had to clarify it was infact not that the procedure is unknown to maple itself or it being unsure of how an error occurred. Anonymous makes more sense.

@vv ok well i like to know exactly how everything i calculate is being calculated, otherwise in the event I do not arrive at the result I expect, retracing my steps and understanding why and what i must change becomes an impossible task, and renders the advantages of using a computer algebra system non-existential in my opinion.

@Thomas Richard well in reading over a few forums it seems that the permissions for all folders and files on a windows 10 system are read only, I'm guessing that  yes indeed there could be something incorrectly configured with my machine, however alot of forums are saying it is the case that all windows 10 systems are configured this way. I can use latex now no problem, but am still unable to use the FileTools package, getting the same permission errors.

@Carl Love  i dont understand why iquo is inbuilt but floor not. isn't it going to be the extended euclidean algorithm? 

@Joe Riel  yep thats fine its just that it was working perfectly well last week and now it gives me these permission denied messages for everything. all good that is pretty typical in general 

@Christopher2222 

Well i never do anything command line wise regarding formatting, and at some point i did try to alter the default formatting last month, but what I am referring to here has been occurring for years. 

and i would have thought if these settings are on default values, why would these things occur seemingly at random for me?

Aside from the colour changes that sporatically occur, the font for bracket pairs also is flawed if i copy a line of code to another execution line or worksheet, like one of the brackets, be it the {},[],or the floor function brackets, one will be slightly larger than the other, so everytime i need to go back and delete one of them and retype, the second time the font is right. I mainly do this because I try to write out formal mathematical statements for all code that i write, so that I don't have concepts "obscured" within my code that is not conveyed in my explaination and expressions for the purely mathematic document relevant. If I was going to offer a suggestion regarding a great solution to this problem, making the product so much more complementary to the way they are in mathematics with regard to latex, in as much as everything is easily translated from maple code to latex, having an "in house" latex editor ( perhaps a maplet, or embedded component or assistant tool? not sure what i would call it here) that enables a user to be entering everything relevant to the worksheet they are currently doing in a properly done latex document that is associated with the worksheet somehow ie the exported final product is sent to a folder in an archive with a name that corresponds to the worksheet's file name. Something like that would make it easy for the maple users AND all the people that complain about latex not being used. 

anyway just a suggestion. 

@tomleslie those look incredible tom have not utilized this feature before!