Maple 2015 Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple 2015

I'm modeling the interaction between rotation and vibration in water molecule. I've come up with the solution functions, but I wanted to make some illustrative animations to fully understand what is going on. I made an animation (in the very end of the attached file) showing vibration of molecule and I want the trajectory of each (of two) particles to be traced after it, how could it be done? Also I want to have the movement of the angular momentum vector (vector with components [Jx=J*cos(varphi)*sin(theta), Jy=J*sin(varphi)*sin(theta), Jz=J*cos(theta)]) be animated simultaneously with the vibration of molecule (on the same plot). Is it hard to achieve?

File: ClassicalTrajectoriesH2X_morse.mw

 

Hello. I want to replicate the results of this table in Maple.

My "attempt" uses the inbuilt dictionary, but it will only find the words of length n, not the frequency of letters in each ....

word_length.mw

Let say I have an array

A := Array([[1], [2], [3]])
Normally if I would like to extend it I will write, eg:

Extend(A, [[4], [5]])

But because this is not 1D array Maple will rise an error. Is there a way to go over this limitation?

hi

in attached file below not answer found for dsolve?

please help me

thanks..

dsove.mw

restart

J := 1:

PDE := diff(T(z, t), z, z)-.2*(diff(T(z, t), t, t)) = int(.7703831837*(diff(T(z, tau), tau, tau))/(t-tau)^.3, tau = 0 .. t):

with(inttrans):

sol := laplace(PDE, t, s):

sol2 := subs([laplace(T(z, t), t, s) = U(z, t), T(z, 0) = sin(J*Pi*z), (D[2](T))(z, 0) = 0], sol)

diff(diff(U(z, t), z), z)-.2000000000*s^2*U(z, t)+.2000000000*s*sin(Pi*z) = -1.000000000*s^.3000000000*sin(Pi*z)+1.000000000*s^1.300000000*U(z, t)

(1)

sol3 := dsolve([sol2, (D[1](U))(0, t) = 0, (D[1](U))(1, t) = 0], U(z, t))

"sol3 := "

(2)

U(z, t) = invlaplace(rhs(sol3), s, t)

Error, invalid input: rhs expects 1 argument, but received 0

 

sol4 := simplify(subs(z = 0, rhs(sol3)))

Error, invalid input: rhs expects 1 argument, but received 0

 

``

``



Download dsove.mw

 

 

 

so I'm trying this:

restart;

sigma := 0.143e-18;

l_0 := 1.87;

l0 := 1.87;

roll := rand(0 .. 25.0);

f_gauss := proc (x) options operator, arrow; exp(-(1/2)*x^2/`σ_x`^2)/sqrt(2*Pi*`σ_x`^2) end proc;

f_norm := proc (dx) options operator, arrow; int(f_gauss(x), x = -(1/2)*dx .. (1/2)*dx) end proc;

sol_gauss := proc (mix) options operator, arrow; evalf(eval(-ln((int(f_gauss(x)*exp(-2*sigma*N2O*sqrt((1/4)*l_0^2-x^2)), x = -(1/2)*dx .. (1/2)*dx))/f_norm(dx))/(sigma*N2O), [N2O = 0.25e20*mix/100])) end proc;

for ii to 10 do

a := roll();

eval(sol_gauss(a), [dx = l_0, `σ_x` = l0])

end do

Already searched and browsed multiple different threads and still cannot find a solution.

Apologizing the noob nature of this question.

 

 

In this code below, Why is the factor command not working?

f := a^2+x^2-2*ax;

a^2+x^2-2*ax

(1)

factor(f);

a^2+x^2-2*ax

(2)

expand((x-a)*(x-a));

a^2-2*a*x+x^2

(3)

``

NULL

NULL


Download factor_polynomial_2_multivariable.mwfactor_polynomial_2_multivariable.mw

 

hi...how i can pdsolve this equation numerically or analyticlly?

this equation is time-fractional  equation with generalized Cattaneo model

where

 

 is the fractional derivative operator considered in the
Caputo sense.

 

FRACTION.mw

restart

k := 1; -1; rho := 1; -1; h := 1; -1; alpha := 2-Upsilon; -1; 0 < Upsilon and Upsilon <= 1

0 < Upsilon and Upsilon <= 1

(1)

k*(diff(T(z, t), z, z)) = rho*(diff(T(z, t), [`$`(t, alpha)]))

diff(diff(T(z, t), z), z) = diff(T(z, t), [`$`(t, 2-Upsilon)])

(2)

k*(diff(T((1/2)*h, t), z)) = 1:

k*(diff(T((-h)*(1/2), t), z)) = 0:

T(z, 0) = 0

T(z, 0) = 0

(3)

NULL



Download FRACTION.mw

 

Dear Pros, I'm a biginer so I have a question about my program.

I have a lot of arrays which are result from 2 while loop. Now, I want creat a matrix from them but i can't. So, could you help me to do it.

For detail: 

V[1]:=[ 1 2 3]

V[2]:=[2 3 4]

V[3]:=[3 4 5]

V[4]:=[2 6 7]

V[5]:=[7 8 9]

...

V[n]

with type of V[i] is a array.

I searched and found a solution by manual to create a matrix as follow:

V_matrix:=<V[1],V[2],V[3]>

but in this case i can't but manual with n=100

please help me to have a Matrix.

Thank a lots.

Hi everybody, 

 

Could somebody just explain me why commands L[1..5] and L[3..6] below do not seem to return "the same type of thing" ?

 

L := Array(1..10, [$(1..10)]);

L := Array(1..10, {(1) = 1, (2) = 2, (3) = 3, (4) = 4, (5) = 5, (6) = 6, (7) = 7, (8) = 8, (9) = 9, (10) = 10})

(1)

L[1..5];
whattype(%);

Array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])

 

Array

(2)

L[3..6];
whattype(%);

Array(3 .. 6, {3 = 3, 4 = 4, 5 = 5, 6 = 6}, datatype = anything, storage = rectangular, order = Fortran_order)

 

Array

(3)

 


Thank you for your attention


Download array.mw

how to specify color at the turning point of mountain shape in dualaxisplot

woud like to specify a point with another color at the top of peak shape line diagram

After using the Groebner and PolynomialIdeals packages, Maple goes into a long calculation when I make an entry of the form

name:=polynomial expression. This can take 10's of minutes for an expression of two lines. The only solution I have found is to save the sheet and restart it and enter the line name:= etc. before loading Groebner and PolynomialIdeals. This is most inconvenient. Is there a better workaround?

how to change rotation angle into slope of line?

with(MTM):
evalf(solve(atan(-1) - 45*Pi/180 = atan(x), x))*180/Pi;

above can not be solved

 

if angle is 30 degree

is following correct?

with(MTM):
angle := 30:
evalf((atan(-1) - 30*Pi/180)/Pi)*(-1.0);

I would like compute the vertices of the convex hull of finitely many points in some \mathbb{R}^{n}, where the coordinates of these points could be rational numbers or irrational numbers like \sqrt{2}.

I know that PolyhedralSets[ConvexHull] is a direct command, however it does not support irrational numbers. But if I transform all coordinates into floating point numbers, for some rational numbers the rounding error would be large enough to affect the result. For example, after the transform some collinear points are no longer collinear.

Thanks!

 

 

 

First 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Last Page 40 of 72