> with(DEtools);
> L := -1.576674; MU := 0; DE13 := {(D(x))(t) = x(t)*(1+4*x(t)*x(t)-y(t)*y(t))+MU*y(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-.43*y(t)*y(t)-L), (D(y))(t) = y(t)*(1+x(t)*x(t)-.5*y(t)*y(t))+MU*x(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-.43*y(t)*y(t)-L)}; DEplot(DE13, [x(t), y(t)], t = 0 .. 20, [[x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .99], [x(0) = -.1, y(0) = -.9], [x(0) = 1.1, y(0) = 0], [x(0) = 0, y(0) = .2], [x(0) = 0, y(0) = .6], [x(0) = .6, y(0) = 0], [x(0) = .75, y(0) = 1], [x(0) = .1, y(0) = .1], [x(0) = .5, y(0) = 1.0], [x(0) = -.5, y(0) = 1], [x(0) = .5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = -.5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = -0.1e-1, y(0) = .99], [x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = -.99], [x(0) = -0.1e-1, y(0) = -.99], [x(0) = .5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = -.5, y(0) = -1], [x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .9]], stepsize = 0.1e-1, scene = [x(t), y(t)], title = "phaseplane 3 prime plot", linecolor = black, thickness = 1);
-1.576674
0
/ / 2 2\
{ D(x)(t) = x(t) \1 + 4 x(t) - y(t) /,
\

/ 2 2\\
D(y)(t) = y(t) \1 + x(t) - 0.5 y(t) / }
/
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .93908020e-1, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .26367741, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .23463732, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of 1.7040014, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity
Warning, plot may be incomplete, the following errors(s) were issued:
cannot evaluate the solution further right of .62484768, probably a singularity

what do i need to do so there are no more singularites?

i cant find the error the program is saying i have 

> L := -1.576674; MU := 0; DE13 := {D(y)*t = -x(t)*(1-2*x(t)*x(t))+MU*y(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-3*y(t)*y(t)-L), (D(x))(t) = y(t)*(1-y(t)*y(t))+MU*y(t)*(x(t)*x(t)-3*y(t)*y(t)-L)}; DEplot(DE13, [x(t), y(t)], t = -20 .. 20, [[x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .99], [x(0) = 0.5e-1, y(0) = .95], [x(0) = .1, y(0) = .9], [x(0) = 0.4e-1, y(0) = .96]], stepsize = 0.1e-2, scene = [x(t), y(t)], title = "phaseplane plot", linecolor = black, thickness = 1, number = 1000);
 
Error, (in DEtools/DEplot/CheckInitial) too few initial conditions: [x(0) = 0.1e-1, y(0) = .99]

it might be hard to read but if someone could help me it would be very appreciated 

For some time I have been running into the problem where uploaded worksheets that are inlined into a Mapleprimes post get gridlines shown, even when they are not specified or shown in the original worksheet. This is a problem because quite often the gridlines make an inlined plot unattractive.

I believe that Mapleprimes uses some version of MapleNet as a mechanism for inlining uploaded worksheets.

It seems that the Standard GUI and/or MapleNet have special handling for gridlines in the sense that they actually distinguish between PLOT structures generated without the `gridlines` option versus those created with `gridlines=false`.  I believe that this has something to do with the persistence of various plot qualities in an output region which (perhaps for historical reasons?)  allow re-execution of a plot input command to produce a plot output rendering that remembers whether gridlines are visible.

If the second plot below does indeed get rendered here in Primes without gridlines visible then one workaround is evident: adding `gridlines=false` instead of omitting the option.

Download test.mw

I'll submit a bug report against MapleNet.

acer

Hello,

I am having trouble using the programmer entry point interface to convert/parfrac. As an example consider : While

> convert([x, [I*(x+I), 1]], parfrac, x);                   

         [-I, [(I + x) I, -I]]

correctly computes a partial fraction decomposition, the equivalent input

> convert([x, [I*x-1, 1]], parfrac, x);  

results in the error message (both in Maple 16 and 17)

Error, (in convert/parfrac) denominator factors must be coprime

which does not make any sense to me, since there is only a single denominator factor present (and it is even the same factor as in the previous call, only written differently).

What is the reason for this behaviour and how can I use convert/parfrac in a way that avoids such errors?

Thanks,

Erik

Hello

I'm doing some calculation reports in maple. These reports are to be submitted to various classification societies - which all have different requirements to the calculations.

I would like to make a report, where the class specific calculations would be append based on a selection of class in the main calculation.

How do I do this?

If I was using latex, matlab, APDL or something like that, I would do and *IF Class=class1, *INPUT class.calc, *ENDIF, but how to do this in maple?

Hi

I need a temperature distribution inside a barrier during a heating process.
I will be appreciated for any help.

wz

Download heating.mw

Hi

I use Maple perhaps only one time per year and thus i'm a beginner with the product (even if i use it since 1996). I'm trying to make the following script work in Maple 17:

http://www.maplesoft.com/applications/view.aspx?SID=4268&ref=Feed&L=F

but i fail.... Some help will be appreciate

restart:

Eq1:=1/r*diff(r*diff(w(r),r),r)-(cos(z1))^2*(w(r)+1)-DP;

dsolve({Eq1});

bcs:=D(w)(0)=0,w(r2)=A1;

dsolve({Eq1,bcs},w(r)):

where z1, Dp, r2, A1 are constants.

Hi, can I get some help with this?

The question is:

Consider the following IVP for a mass of m = 2 kg attached to a spring with a spring constant k = 9 N/m. The spring mass system is in a medium with damping constant b.

2y" + by' + 9y = 0

y(0) = 0, D(y)(0) = -3 

It then asks find three values b1, b2, b3 where b1 is underdamped, b2 is critical, b3 is over. 

I set b1 as 1, b2 as sqt 72, b3 as 9. 

Then it asks to find the quasi period. 

I can't get my quasi period right. My answer is 2pi/ sqrt (4.5).

Any help?  

Hi.

Please, I need a code in maple for adaptative setp size control for runge Kutta.

Thank you.

Hi.

Please help to use dsolve.

Suppose I have a Matrix A of size two. Y=[u,v].

Y'(t)=A*y(t).

How can use dsolve this problem.

Thanks

Is there any simple way to print the sum of a series with exceptions?

For example, the following works (sort of), but its not consistent with mathematical notation, where one would expect to see something like a Sigma^' printed out, and the condition, alongw ith ther limits appear under the Sigma sign:

[Sum(1/(k^2-p),k=0..infinity),And(k<>p)]

Hi MaplePrime-ers!

I've been using the Maple(17) toolbox in Matlab(2012b) to quickly enumerate systems of equations by: (i) solving them symbolically, (ii) using unapply to make them functions, (iii) then supplying the points (driver equations) to get the system solution.  Speed is a must, because there may be 3 million+ systems to solve.  Symbolics is also very important because I am evaluating topology, so the structure of the equations may change, and therefore a functional approach will not work.

I have had success (seen in the first code snippet).  I would like similiar behaviour in the second code snippet, but sometimes I get 'solutions may be lost' as an error message,  or 'Error, (in unapply) variables must be unique and of type name'

The system of equations include:  Linear equations, 5th order polynomials, absolute functions, and pieceiwse functions.

Here is code with a topology that solves:

#Interconnection Equations
eq2[1] := FD_T + EM2_T = 0;
eq2[2] := ICE_T + GEN_T = 0;
eq2[3] := EM2_A + GEN_A + BAT_A = 0;
eq2[4] := -FD_W + EM2_W = 0;
eq2[5] := -ICE_W + GEN_W = 0;
eq2[6] := -EM2_V + GEN_V = 0;
eq2[7] := -EM2_V + BAT_V = 0;

#ICE
eq_c[1] := ICE_mdot_g=((671.5) + (-21.94)*ICE_T + (0.1942)*ICE_W + (0.5113)*ICE_T^2 + (-0.01271)*ICE_T*ICE_W + ( -0.0008761)*ICE_W^2 + (-0.006071)*ICE_T^3 + (9.867e-07)*ICE_T^2*ICE_W + (5.616e-05)*ICE_T*ICE_W^2 + (1.588e-06)*ICE_W^3 + (3.61e-05)*ICE_T^4 + (8.98e-07)*ICE_T^3*ICE_W + (-2.814e-07)*ICE_T^2*ICE_W^2 + (-8.121e-08)*ICE_T*ICE_W^3 + ( -8.494e-08 )*ICE_T^5 + (-2.444e-09)*ICE_T^4*ICE_W + (-9.311e-10)*ICE_T^3*ICE_W^2 + ( 5.835e-10)*ICE_T^2*ICE_W^3 ) *1/3600/1000 * ICE_T * ICE_W;

#BAT
eq_c[2] := BAT = 271;

#EM2
EM2_ReqPow_eq := (-148.3) + (4.267)*abs(EM2_W) + (12.77)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.0364)*abs(EM2_W)^2 + ( 1.16)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.258)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 0.0001181)*abs(EM2_W)^3 + (-0.0005994)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T) + ( 0.0001171)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + (0.001739 )*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-1.245e-07 )*abs(EM2_W)^4 + ( 1.2e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^3*abs(EM2_T) + ( -1.584e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 4.383e-07)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-2.947e-06)*abs(EM2_T)^4;
eq_c[3] := EM2_P = piecewise( EM2_T = 0, 0, EM2_W = 0, 0, EM2_W*EM2_T < 0,-1 * EM2_ReqPow_eq, EM2_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[4] := EM2_A = EM2_P/EM2_V;

#GEN
GEN_ReqPow_eq:= (-5.28e-12) + ( 3.849e-14)*abs(GEN_W) + (-71.9)*abs(GEN_T) + (-1.168e-16)*abs(GEN_W)^2 +(1.296)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T) + (2.489)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (1.451e-19)*abs(GEN_W)^3 + (0.0001326)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T) + (-0.008141)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (-0.004539)*abs(GEN_T)^3 +(-6.325e-23)*abs(GEN_W)^4 + (-2.091e-07)*abs(GEN_W)^3*abs(GEN_T) + ( 3.455e-06)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T)^2 + ( 2.499e-05)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^3 + (-5.321e-05)*abs(GEN_T)^4;
eq_c[5] := GEN_P = piecewise( GEN_T = 0, 0, GEN_W = 0, 0, GEN_W*GEN_T < 0,-1 * GEN_ReqPow_eq, GEN_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[6] := GEN_A = GEN_P/GEN_V;

#ASSUMPTIONS
assume(BAT_V::nonnegative);
assume(FD_W::nonnegative);

#FINAL EQUATIONS

sys_eqs2 := convert(eq2,set) union {eq_c[1],eq_c[2],eq_c[3],eq_c[4],eq_c[5],eq_c[6]};

#Selecting which variables to solve for:

drivers2:= { ICE_T,ICE_W,FD_T,FD_W};
symvarnames2:=select(type,indets(convert(sys_eqs2,list)),name);
notdrivers2:=symvarnames2 minus drivers2;

#Symbolic solve

sol2:=solve(sys_eqs2,notdrivers2) assuming real:
symb_sol2:=unapply(sol2,convert(drivers2,list)):


#Enumerate (there will generally be about 40, not 6)

count := 0;
for i1 from 1 to 40 do
     for i2 from 1 to 40 do
          for i3 from 1 to 40 do
               for i4 from 1 to 40 do
                    count := count + 1;
                    solsol2(count) := symb_sol2(i1,i2,i3,i4);
               od;
          od;
     od;
od;
count;

This works great!  I would like simliar output in my second code snippet, but this time with more inputs to symb_sol.  However, if I try and change the interconnection equations a little, and add a piecewise function, and another driver... (differences in bold)

#Interconnection Equations
eq1[1] := FD_T+EM2_T = 0;
eq1[2] := ICE_T+GBb_T = 0;
eq1[3] := GEN_T+GBa_T = 0;
eq1[4] := EM2_A+GEN_A+BAT_A = 0;
eq1[5] := -FD_W+EM2_W = 0;
eq1[6] := -GEN_W+GBa_W = 0;
eq1[7] := -ICE_W+GBb_W = 0;
eq1[8] := -EM2_V+GEN_V = 0;
eq1[9] := -EM2_V+BAT_V = 0;

#ICE
eq_c[1] := ICE_mdot_g=((671.5) + (-21.94)*ICE_T + (0.1942)*ICE_W + (0.5113)*ICE_T^2 + (-0.01271)*ICE_T*ICE_W + ( -0.0008761)*ICE_W^2 + (-0.006071)*ICE_T^3 + (9.867e-07)*ICE_T^2*ICE_W + (5.616e-05)*ICE_T*ICE_W^2 + (1.588e-06)*ICE_W^3 + (3.61e-05)*ICE_T^4 + (8.98e-07)*ICE_T^3*ICE_W + (-2.814e-07)*ICE_T^2*ICE_W^2 + (-8.121e-08)*ICE_T*ICE_W^3 + ( -8.494e-08 )*ICE_T^5 + (-2.444e-09)*ICE_T^4*ICE_W + (-9.311e-10)*ICE_T^3*ICE_W^2 + ( 5.835e-10)*ICE_T^2*ICE_W^3 ) *1/3600/1000 * ICE_T * ICE_W;

#BAT
eq_c[2] := BAT = 271;

#EM2
EM2_ReqPow_eq := (-148.3) + (4.267)*abs(EM2_W) + (12.77)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.0364)*abs(EM2_W)^2 + ( 1.16)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.258)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 0.0001181)*abs(EM2_W)^3 + (-0.0005994)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T) + ( 0.0001171)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + (0.001739 )*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-1.245e-07 )*abs(EM2_W)^4 + ( 1.2e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^3*abs(EM2_T) + ( -1.584e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 4.383e-07)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-2.947e-06)*abs(EM2_T)^4;
eq_c[3] := EM2_P = piecewise( EM2_T = 0, 0, EM2_W = 0, 0, EM2_W*EM2_T < 0,-1 * EM2_ReqPow_eq, EM2_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[4] := EM2_A = EM2_P/EM2_V;

#GEN
GEN_ReqPow_eq:= (-5.28e-12) + ( 3.849e-14)*abs(GEN_W) + (-71.9)*abs(GEN_T) + (-1.168e-16)*abs(GEN_W)^2 +(1.296)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T) + (2.489)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (1.451e-19)*abs(GEN_W)^3 + (0.0001326)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T) + (-0.008141)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (-0.004539)*abs(GEN_T)^3 +(-6.325e-23)*abs(GEN_W)^4 + (-2.091e-07)*abs(GEN_W)^3*abs(GEN_T) + ( 3.455e-06)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T)^2 + ( 2.499e-05)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^3 + (-5.321e-05)*abs(GEN_T)^4;
eq_c[5] := GEN_P = piecewise( GEN_T = 0, 0, GEN_W = 0, 0, GEN_W*GEN_T < 0,-1 * GEN_ReqPow_eq, GEN_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[6] := GEN_A = GEN_P/GEN_V;

#GB
FiveSpeedGearbox_R := proc(ig)
local i ,eq;
i[1]:=3.32;
i[2]:=2;
i[3]:=1.36;
i[4]:=1.01;
i[5]:=0.82;
eq:= piecewise(ig=1,i[1],ig=2, i[2],ig=3,i[3],ig=4,i[4],ig=5,i[5],1);
return eq(ig);
end proc;

eq_c[7] := GBb_T = -1/GB_R * GBa_T;
eq_c[8] := GBb_W = GB_R * GBa_W;
eq_c[9] := GB_R = FiveSpeedGearbox_R(ig);

 

#System Equations
sys_eqs := convert(eq1,set) union convert(eq_c,set);

 

 #Solve for variables
symvarnames:=select(type,indets(convert(sys_eqs,list)),name);
drivers:= {ig, ICE_T,ICE_W,FD_T,FD_W};
not_drivers := symvarnames minus drivers;

#Assumptinons

assume(BAT_V::nonnegative);
assume(FD_W::nonnegative);

sol:=(solve(sys_eqs,not_drivers) assuming real);

symb_sol:=unapply(sol,convert(drivers,list)): ---> Error, (in unapply) variables must be unique and of type name

Subsequent parts don't work...

count := 0;
for i1 from 1 to 40 do
     for i2 from 1 to 40 do
          for i3 from 1 to 40 do
               for i4 from 1 to 40 do
                    for i5 from 1 to 40 do
                         count := count + 1;
                         solsol2(count) := symb_sol2(i1,i2,i3,i4,5);
                    od;
               od; 
          od;
     od;
od;
count;

While running the last line sol:, 1 of 2 things will happen, depending on the solver. Maple17 will take a long time (30+ minutes) to solve, then report nothing, or sol will solve, but will report "some solutions have been lost".

Afterwards, evaluating symb_sol(0,0,0,0,0) will return a viable solution (real values for each of the variables).  Whereas evaluating symb_sol(0,X,0,0,0), where X <> 0, will return and empty list [].

Does anyone know how to (i) speed up the symbolic solve time?  (ii) Return ALL of the solutions?

Thanks in advance for reading this.  I've really no idea why this isn't working.  I've also attached two worksheets with the code: noGB.mw   withGB.mw

 Adam

How do I know if I have the latest Maple build id?  What is it now?

Let  us consider the general case of symbolic values C(xC,yC). I make use of the idea suggested by edgar in http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/97743-How-To-Prove-Morleys-Trisector-Theorem : no assumptions.

restart; with(geometry); point(A, 0, 0);
point(B, 1, 0);
point(C, xC, yC);
point(MA, (xC+1)*(1/2), (1/2)*yC);
point(MC, 1/2, 0);
point(MB, (1/2)*xC, (1/2)*yC);
point(E, (0+1+xC)*(1/3), (0+0+yC)*(1/3));# the center of mass
line(l1, x = 1/4, [x, y]);
The coordinates of the center of the first described circle are found as the solutions of the system of the equations of midperpendiculars.

midpoint(ae, A, E); coordinates(ae);


S1 := solve({x = 1/4, ((xC+1)*(1/3))*(x-(xC+1)*(1/6))+(1/3)*yC*(y-(1/6)*yC) = 0}, {x, y});

BTW, Maple can't create the midperpendiculars in this case.

point(O1, op(map(rhs, S1)));
                               O1

Simple details are omitted in the above. The coordinates of the centers of the two next described circles are found similarly.
coordinates(midpoint(mce, MC, E));

S2 := solve({x = 3/4, ((-1/2+xC)*(1/3))*(x-5/12-(1/6)*xC)+(1/3)*yC*(y-(1/6)*yC) = 0}, {x, y});

point(O2, op(map(rhs, S2)));

                               O2
coordinates(midpoint(bma, B, MA)); coordinates(midpoint(be, B, E));
  

                

S3 := solve({(xC-1)*(x-(xC+3)*(1/4))+yC*(y-(1/4)*yC) = 0, ((-2+xC)*(1/3))*(x-(4+xC)*(1/6))+(1/3)*yC*(y-(1/6)*yC) = 0}, {x, y});

point(O3, op(map(rhs, S3)));

                               O3

Now we find the equation of the circumference which passes through O1, O2, and O3.

eq := a*x+b*y+x^2+y^2+c = 0:
sol := solve({eval(eq, S1), eval(eq, S2), eval(eq, S3)}, {a, b, c});

A long output can be seen in the attached .mw file.

eq1 := eval(eq, sol);

  Now we find (in suspense)  the coordinates of the next center and verify whether it belongs to the sircumference O1O2O3.

coordinates(midpoint(mac, C, MA)); coordinates(midpoint(ec, E, C)); S4 := solve({(xC-1)*(x-(3*xC+1)*(1/4))+yC*(y-3*yC*(1/4)) = 0, ((2*xC-1)*(1/3))*(x-(4*xC+1)*(1/6))+(2*yC*(1/3))*(y-4*yC*(1/6)) = 0}, {x, y});

 point(O4, op(map(rhs, S4)));

                               O4
simplify(eval(eq1, S4));

                             0 = 0

Hope the reader will have a real pleasure to find the two residuary centers and to verify these on his/her own.

geom2.mw