MarcinM

30 Reputation

2 Badges

4 years, 107 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by MarcinM

Hi Math People,

I can't find an answer if it is possible to insert slider or any other component into document, adjust its value by sliding it and execute all following calculations in the document below the slider, those which depends on the value of slider parameter?

I know this is possible in graphs, or explore command, but could it be simply setting some value let's say "a". Lets set its value by slider and when slider is set, code should automatically update document? This part of code of slider "Action When Value changes"

Or am I expecting too much?

Best regards

Marcin

Hi,

Anyone knows how to plot a surface btw 2 spacecurves in 3d? For example a flat curve x^2+y^2=1 which maybe a upper half of above circle for y=0 to 1 and a spacecurve which is a function for example 2+x^2*y. So second curve should be above the first and limit a surface From the top. 

Can't find a solution in help and parametric curves does not solve a problem.

In fact it would be enough to have a vertical surface starting on a xy plane and limited by Givenchy function. As it is in line integral calculations.

Regards

Marcin

Hi,

I am trying to combine two simple plots of spacecurve and surface but can't manage. Asking for help because I know it doable, it is too simple not to be...

So I need something like this:

trying tirh spacecurve and surface and in general it appears together but cannot align axes so both are wrongly rotataed. Is there any simple and elegant way (without Maple programming language, I am not using it yet) in Maple document with few commands?

Thanks in advance

Marcin

Hi,

What am I doing wrong? Seems like some unit compatibility problem when tryaing to solve simple task with momentum conservation rule...

with(Units);
Automatically loading the Units[Simple] subpackage


m__2 := 0.400*Unit('kg');
m__1 := 0.300*Unit('kg');
x__w := 0.700*Unit('m');

v__2p := 0.000;

v__1p := 2*Unit(('m')/('s'));



Download zadanie_z_jednostakim_-_problem.mw

m__1*v__1p + m__2*v__2p = m__1*v__1k + m__2*v__2k;
                                               /s\
             0.6 = (0.3 v__1k + 0.4 v__2k) Unit|-|
                                               \m/


subs(v__2p = 0, 0.600 = (0.300*v__1k + 0.400*v__2k)*Units[Unit](s/m));
                                               /s\
             0.6 = (0.3 v__1k + 0.4 v__2k) Unit|-|
                                               \m/

v__1k := solve(0.600 = (0.300*v__1k + 0.400*v__2k)*Units[Unit](s/m), v__1k);
                                                  /m\
           v__1k := (-1.333333333 v__2k + 2.) Unit|-|
                                                  \s/

 

1/2*m__1*v__1p^2 + 1/2*m__2*v__2p^2 = 1/2*m__1*v__1k^2 + 1/2*m__1*v__2k^2;


Error, (in Units:-Simple:-+) the following expressions imply incompatible dimensions: {.1500000000*(-1.333333333*v__2k+2.)^2*Units:-Unit(J)+.1500000000*Units:-Unit(kg)*v__2k^2}

Sitting and trying find solution in help and on forum but no chance.

I hope if someone copy code into maple it will look lik on my screen. Anyway I have uploaded file and below You have screen picture.

If I remove units from variables on the top all is working like a charm.

Please help me find an error guys.

Reagrds

Marcin

Hi and Welcome Everyone here.

It is my first post and I am happy to have Maple 2020 Personal Edition. It is great tool and I am still learning.

Durng first weeks I solved many things with help and forums but I can't solve this simple one below:

How to force maple to divide a sqrtof (4*n^2 + 5*n - 7) by n to have each expression divided separately and all still inside of sqrt?

sqrt(4*n^2 + 5*n - 7)/n to get:sqrt(4 + 5/n - 7/n^2) by collect or expand function or anything else. I was able to do it by rewriting combine(((4*n^2 + 5*n - 7)/n^2)^0.5, radical) in such form but it is not what I want to have since I need to rewriting it manually.

Can any "wizard of maple" help me to find an answer? Or at least give a hint in what direction to go, I will dig later myself.

Regards

Marcin

 

Page 1 of 1