MaplePrimes Questions

Search Questions:

Latest Questions Latest Questions Feed

According to kernelopts(version), I am using Maple 16.02, X86 64 LINUX, Nov 18 2012, Build ID 7888210 , having just updated

Maple 16.

I have a Maple worksheet with some graphs of 10^5 data points. When I export the worksheet to a pdf for inclusion in a LaTeX document (with pdfpages package, this recognizes page breaks), the file is around 100 Mb, much larger than I would like.

It seems that the file is large as a figure in the pdf is not just an image, the pdf seems to contain all of the information necessary to plot each data point individually.

Is there some way to encourage Maple 16 to treat figures as bitmaps (or something similarly much smaller than the original figures) upon exporting a worksheet to a pdf? I'll be happy for any suggestions.

NOTES:

1. This question was originally for Maple 16.00. Updating to 16.02a has not solved the problem.

2. I am suspicious that there is some bug in how Maple 16 exports figures made with "plot" to a pdf file.

When I try various methods of compressing the pdf that I've seen on the web, such as with pdftk 1.44, or ghostscript 8.70 or 9.07,  or pdf2ps followed by ps2pdf ,

error messages are returned. For example using pdftk:

pdftk input.pdf output.pdf

gives

"Done. Input errors, so no output created"

 

Ok guys, so i have a bunch of datapoints in 3d (x,y,z)

I'm trying to calculate an equation using maple that will express z as a function of x and y.

I've been browesing around for like 2 hours now with no hope. Help?

 

Is there any command in maple that can show us an assigned varibale how much bytes occupied on memory ?

a:=["just a string", 3.14 , 123 , x/y]

d:=array( 1 .. 2, 1 .. 2, [( 1, 1 ) = ("just a string"), ( 1, 2 ) = (3.14), ( 2, 1 ) = (123), ( 2, 2 ) = (x/y)  ] )

c:=a x^2 + b x + c

b := Matrix(2, 2, {(1, 1) = "just a string", (1, 2) = 3.14, (2, 1) = 123, (2, 2) = x/y})

b := Matrix(2, 2, {(1, 1) = "just a string", (1, 2) = 3.14, (2, 1) = 123, (2, 2) = x/y})

(1)

``


It should be great for benchmarking !

how to add another line in this template of formula

use the expression template  

how to add another line like

 

thank you in advance for your help

Der Group,

 

after updating to OS X Yosemite the License data of Maple 18 are invalid. What can I do?

 

Yours

Berthold

Hi Maple friends.

If I have y=-x^2+9 and y=x+3, how can I find the area that is bounded by the functions? 

Easy enough to calculate by hand, but I need to use Maple to check my answers. Most preferably I'd like to use the Maple context menu to get the result, but any solution will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Can anyone tell me where I can find tutorial explaining how to solve laplace transform? I need a tutorial that explains starting with simple resolution to advanced resolution.

Hi all;

I have following program for plotting numerous function using hybrid functions.

if g1(t) is arbitrary function and g2(t) is its approximate by hybrid functions, I want to have a table of g1(t)-g2(t) for different value of t. but the result is without numeric values. what part is wrong????

best wishes

OHB.mws

Mahmood   Dadkhah

Ph.D Candidate

Applied Mathematics Department

Hi Everyone,

I have an expression that contains a second order derivative: EXPR:=ay''(x) + bz'(x) + cf'(x)+... The variable y  obeys an ordinary differential equation, y''(x) = f(y,x). I would like to replace the second order deriavtive in my expression with f(y,x). So far I have tried applyrule([y''(x)=f(y,x)],EXPR), subs(y''(x)=f(y,x),EXPR) and algsubs(y''(x)=f(y,x),EXPR) and nothing seems to work. Any helpful suggestions?

 

How to calculate the Amplitude of two combined sinusoidal of different frequency and phase of a general equation as:

 

A sin(\omega_1 t)+B sin(\omega_2 t+\theta)


Thanks

I need to know if the Software Maple solve, step-by-step series of Fourier and Laplace transforms? The Maple command has to solve step by step series of Fourier and Laplace transforms? or commands show only the direct solution?

I have a set "EQ" containing N linear equations in N unknowns. The only symbolic variables in each "EQ[i]" are the unknowns. I want to write a procedure that derives the matrices "A" and "b" where A.x=b is the same linear system stored in "EQ". In other words, I want to write the linear system in the matrix form.

Can anyone guide me through writting such a procedure?
As an example do it with the system written in the following file.

Note: This procedure will be used for large linear systems (e.g. 2000 Equations, 2000 Unknowns) so it will be important that the procedure uses the least operations required.

LinearSystem.mw

Thanks in advance.

I have a large system of linear algebraic equations that I want to solve (2005 Unknowns, 2005 Equations). I was wondering that what are the proper commands to use in maple for solving the system as fast as possible. Take a look at the files in the download link if you want to see the system of linear algebraic equations.

http://pc.cd/h79

Please provide me any suggesitons that you may think will be helpful like using other sofwares that are good in doing this work such as MATLAB or something else.


Thanks in Advance




Hi again,

 

I am lost... again. I worked with the Physics package and have obtained my result in form of a lengthy equation of commutators of non-commuting objects. So basically my problem is solved, except that I now want to compute some examples to see, if everything is correct. For that purpose I want to replace now the non-commuting objects with explicit matrices, compute the result and see if it agrees with numerical studies. However, I have no clue which command to use, because if I try it with subs, then the multiplication is of the wrong type and Maple won't multiply my matrices. I tried to use eval but wasn't successful.

Here is an exampe to see what I mean.

Test2.mw

 

Thank you for your time

 

NOh

The following MWE shows what I mean:

with(Physics):Setup(mathematical=true):

Setup(noncommutativeprefix={MX,MY,MZ});

test:=proc()

    local eq;

    eq:=-Commutator(MX,MY)-Commutator(MZ,MY);

    eq:=simplify(subs(MX=-MZ,eq));

    return eq;

end proc:

 

test();  # yields -[-MZ,MY] - [MZ,MY]

 

%  # yields 0

 

 

Any ideas how I can solve this? I would like to return the simplified version.

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Last Page 6 of 1069